teh_619 wrote...
LeCavalier wrote...
Yeah the old running animation was better. Keep in mind though that it isn't the finished product. It might not as bad in the final version of the game.
It is a finished product.
Woobels wrote...
teh_619 wrote...
LeCavalier wrote...
Yeah the old running animation was better. Keep in mind though that it isn't the finished product. It might not as bad in the final version of the game.
It is a finished product.
Is it really?
I'm not saying I don't believe you but I haven't heard any confirmation about this.
I actually haven't heard much from Bioware's side since they released the demo which is a little concerning..
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
One of those type of people I see.Guldhun2 wrote...
squee365 wrote...
If animations are the worst thing about this game...
then I honestly don't really care. Especially since I didn't even notice a change.
Then, sir, you should immediately consult a doctor since you are obviously blind.
Modifié par Jigero, 16 février 2012 - 04:37 .
Fpriestly wrote...
Gaiden96 wrote...
How does it affect your enjoyment in any significant way though?
Unless you're playing the game for the mechanics alone I don't see how it would be a deterrent to something as broad and expansive as ME3.
As one poster above said, it's an immersion breaker.
Not just that though. It just irks me knowing that I've paid for mediocrity from a game developer...
Ever played Batman Arkham City? It's the best comic book hero game ever, and one of the best games of all time. The metacritic score is insane.
Anyway, Rocksteady, an amateur developer with only one title under their belt managed to pull off something that Bioware has never been able to do, despite their much greater experience.
Rocksteady made a game (using UE3.5) that gave their fans/consumers high resolution textures, PhysX, 3D Vision, realistic looking hair and hair physics, smooth animations, awesome gameplay.....and the list goes on.
Now if Rocksteady can do it, why can't Bioware? Bioware can do it I have no doubt, but they cut one too many corners, and thats mostly because their fanbase allows them to do so.
How many times have I heard on these forums,"You don't play Bioware games for the graphics, you play them for the story."
But who says we have to choose between a great story and great graphics? The two have been merged successfully before many times, and since Bioware is supposedly a AAA developer, you'd think they'd have the capability to do it.
But they always fall short, due to laziness I think.
Jigero wrote...
Well the Demo has been around since E3 2011 it is possible to fix the animations. Will they? I'm not holding my breath
Vega's animations are particually bad, he talks like a ventriloquist's dummy
Modifié par Luigitornado, 16 février 2012 - 05:10 .
LeCavalier wrote...
Too many dates are going around with how old the demo is.
Doesn't matter. There had to be some sort of common ground with animations and gameplay elements.Random Jerkface wrote...
Multiplayer was developed separately from the campaign, IIRC.
hex23 wrote...
LeCavalier wrote...
Too many dates are going around with how old the demo is.
You're not likely to get one magic date for how old this build of the game is....you're going to get a string of dates, going back months, because the two levels shown are very old.
Modifié par wijse, 16 février 2012 - 05:28 .
wijse wrote...
Funny how the people defending the animations stopped doing it after the two pictures were posted. Batman Arkham City animations were awesome on all platforms. There no excuses.
Gaiden96 wrote...
The game is not going to be perfect. Nothing ever will.
Random Jerkface wrote...
Multiplayer was developed separately from the campaign, IIRC.
Modifié par Armass81, 16 février 2012 - 07:14 .
Not sure how things worked with console versions, but the full game still has a 15gb requirement for the PC, as did ME2.chrisnabal wrote...
Random Jerkface wrote...
Multiplayer was developed separately from the campaign, IIRC.
They had to fit it and the single player onto the disc...as in one. Considering the length of its predecessor, its valid to think that some things may be cut or 'dulled down'.
Retour en haut