Disappointed with the framerate
#726
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 06:52
#727
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 10:15
#728
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 11:09
#729
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 11:16
#730
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 11:18
xHezz90 wrote...
Maybe they aren't mentioning it because the ending takes priority. I mean the ending hub-bub is huge, compared to a handful of us who want the frame rate fixed.
The ending can be fixed by DLC but the framerate affects gameplay.
#731
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 11:24
Maybe they aren't mentioning it because the ending takes priority. I mean the ending hub-bub is huge, compared to a handful of us who want the frame rate fixed.[/quote]
The ending can be fixed by DLC but the framerate affects gameplay.
[/quote]
Yeah I know that but my point was that the ending is taking up a lot of the press and attention.
#732
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 11:49
#733
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 11:52
#734
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 11:54
Valkyre4 wrote...
what are you talking about? it is not like the ps3 version has a different ending. We have all the issues of every other version out there and on top of that we have bad performance that affects gameplay!
Exactly that's the main issue gameplay but what really brings my ****** to a boil is the fact bioware ignore us just look at the 360 thread its so unfair.http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/345/index/9715993/1&lf=8
#735
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 11:57
#736
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 12:02
http://social.biowar...6/1523#10088494
#737
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 02:44
unworthyBOZO wrote...
Valkyre4 wrote...
what are you talking about? it is not like the ps3 version has a different ending. We have all the issues of every other version out there and on top of that we have bad performance that affects gameplay!
Exactly that's the main issue gameplay but what really brings my ****** to a boil is the fact bioware ignore us just look at the 360 thread its so unfair.http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/345/index/9715993/1&lf=8
OMG...
Come on bioware... that's ridiculous.
they are acting as if we are a bunch of kids complaining about some minor issue.
I just played a part las night.... let's just say it was full of action and it was suposed to be emotional, but it sucked because it run at 10fps.
Come on people, let's not give up. Let's not show them that if they ignore us long enough they can sell us any **** they like with any ****ty quality they like
#738
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 03:32
unworthyBOZO wrote...
Valkyre4 wrote...
what are you talking about? it is not like the ps3 version has a different ending. We have all the issues of every other version out there and on top of that we have bad performance that affects gameplay!
Exactly that's the main issue gameplay but what really brings my ****** to a boil is the fact bioware ignore us just look at the 360 thread its so unfair.http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/345/index/9715993/1&lf=8
WOW, just WOW! This is insulting to us! Seriously, we're a joke to them. Don't expect anything, ME2 never got fixed, this will also. Very Sad, shoul've sticked with the PC version
#739
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:46
I send a PM to the moderation askin why it got closed, saying the thread was about they ignoring us and not about the techincal issues (hoping to get an answer).
BTW, and please with NO SPOILERS.
Why is it that the ending is so bad???, Is it related to the story or is everyone mad because it's almost impossible to get the best ending without playing multiplayer???
#740
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 06:06
Fbh wrote...
BTW, and please with NO SPOILERS.
Why is it that the ending is so bad???, Is it related to the story or is everyone mad because it's almost impossible to get the best ending without playing multiplayer???
Can't tell you that without giving spoilers, if you don't mind spoilers PM me and I will let you know.
#741
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 06:40
#742
Guest_magnetite_*
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 06:51
Guest_magnetite_*
Just stating the facts.
Modifié par magnetite, 17 mars 2012 - 06:52 .
#743
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 06:57
magnetite wrote...
PS3 is pretty old hardware. It's GPU only runs at around 200 GFLOPS. Some of the best graphics cards you can find today run at roughly 3800 GFLOPS (AMD 7970).
Just stating the facts.
That has nothing to do with them ignoring PS3 players and the problems we're having. Xbox is even older and they're getting all the attention they could possibly want.
#744
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 07:03
magnetite wrote...
PS3 is pretty old hardware. It's GPU only runs at around 200 GFLOPS. Some of the best graphics cards you can find today run at roughly 3800 GFLOPS (AMD 7970).
Just stating the facts.
You can also add in the fact that 360 is pretty old hardware too X_X . And of course the best graphics card for PC are always getting out dated every 6 months or so. But your comparing two different industry.
#745
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 07:55
magnetite wrote...
PS3 is pretty old hardware. It's GPU only runs at around 200 GFLOPS. Some of the best graphics cards you can find today run at roughly 3800 GFLOPS (AMD 7970).
Just stating the facts.
your... "facts" are absolutely irrelevant in many ways.
a) xbox 360 is even older hardware.
c) ps3 has arguably the best console graphics this gen
d) if a company thinks a hardware is outdated for its game, then they simply DONT release it on that hardware at all. They dont go about releasing a choppy sloppy version of it after promising everyone that it will look and run the same as the other console. If they think ps3 is not good enough, dont release the game at all.
Your facts and excuses are simply wrong.
Modifié par Valkyre4, 17 mars 2012 - 07:55 .
#746
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:49
#747
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:07
Valkyre4 wrote...
magnetite wrote...
PS3 is pretty old hardware. It's GPU only runs at around 200 GFLOPS. Some of the best graphics cards you can find today run at roughly 3800 GFLOPS (AMD 7970).
Just stating the facts.
your... "facts" are absolutely irrelevant in many ways.
a) xbox 360 is even older hardware.ps3 has produced far better graphics than mass effect 3 and they run as smooth as butter
c) ps3 has arguably the best console graphics this gen
d) if a company thinks a hardware is outdated for its game, then they simply DONT release it on that hardware at all. They dont go about releasing a choppy sloppy version of it after promising everyone that it will look and run the same as the other console. If they think ps3 is not good enough, dont release the game at all.
Your facts and excuses are simply wrong.
To add some examples for point
Modifié par TheBigLebowski, 17 mars 2012 - 11:08 .
#748
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 01:51
ypmud wrote...
shall i put a comment in here the 360 version is the one they wrote the game for then ported over to ps3 and possibly pc (all though the pc version runs like no port ive ever seen) my guess is they are all working on the 360 version as they know its sku inside and out then when all the major issues with the 360 are sorted are they going to touch the ps3 issues (ps3 is a mofo to code on at the best of times so sorting out issues with framerates and optimising if your not an sku guru is going to be nightmareish unless they speak to sony directly and im pretty sure ea will not let that happen)
This is not true. Not anymore anyway. There are many multiplatform games from ea that are the same if not better on PS3. Dead Space 2 is a prime example. In fact most ea games now have extremely good parity between consoles. If bioware has issues with the ps3 (which i cant understand since their other games run just fine on ps3) then they need to ask ea for help. Not even Sony. In any case it is inexcusable.
#749
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 07:22
ypmud wrote...
shall i put a comment in here the 360 version is the one they wrote the game for then ported over to ps3 and possibly pc (all though the pc version runs like no port ive ever seen) my guess is they are all working on the 360 version as they know its sku inside and out then when all the major issues with the 360 are sorted are they going to touch the ps3 issues (ps3 is a mofo to code on at the best of times so sorting out issues with framerates and optimising if your not an sku guru is going to be nightmareish unless they speak to sony directly and im pretty sure ea will not let that happen)
So... how is this an excuse for Bioware ignoring us.
And besides, Bioware and EA are developers that have made several games for Ps3, they probably know how the hardware works better than you or me. Knowing this they decided to tell us there will be no difference in quality... which isn't true.
#750
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 01:23





Retour en haut




