Aller au contenu

Photo

The graphics look like total crap :(


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
164 réponses à ce sujet

#101
Nomanor

Nomanor
  • Members
  • 110 messages
Edit: POst removed



:devil:

Modifié par Chris Priestly, 15 février 2012 - 03:33 .


#102
Lord Issa

Lord Issa
  • Members
  • 200 messages
The graphics on the PC look great to me, although I am a little iffy about the animations.

#103
G3rman

G3rman
  • Members
  • 2 382 messages

Nomanor wrote...

Mettyx wrote...

This game is designed for decrepit 7 year old console hardware, consoles don't magically upgrade themselves each year.

Unfortunately this also means that once again consoletards(people who own consoles and buy games for them) have once again ruined a game for PC.
:( :sick:


I agree with you 100% man.

I wish console ****s would just fvck off.


Sorry, some people don't measure there manhoods with PC rigs and how much we can shell out for a build.  Some of us just don't care.  Consoles have a huge market with professional and casual gamers alike and if they weren't successful they wouldn't be around.

Get off your PC high horse and learn that not everyone has the same look on gaming as you do.

#104
TheLostGenius

TheLostGenius
  • Members
  • 2 548 messages
 THought the graphics looked great. Time to upgrade your computer.

#105
evilmunky80

evilmunky80
  • Members
  • 230 messages

Nomanor wrote...

Mettyx wrote...

This game is designed for decrepit 7 year old console hardware, consoles don't magically upgrade themselves each year.

Unfortunately this also means that once again consoletards(people who own consoles and buy games for them) have once again ruined a game for PC.
:( :sick:


I agree with you 100% man.

I wish console ****s would just fvck off.


That's funny, I feel the same way about elitist PC douchebags.

#106
VolusvsReaper

VolusvsReaper
  • Members
  • 1 186 messages

Nomanor wrote...

Anyone else noticed the terrible animations and crap graphics?

in this day and age, this is unacceptable

:(


What a spoiled brat....not much else here can be said.

#107
TheLostGenius

TheLostGenius
  • Members
  • 2 548 messages

Lord Issa wrote...

The graphics on the PC look great to me, although I am a little iffy about the animations.


Try running it on 720p with everything else maxed. I think their is some quirk at 1080p with erratic animation.

#108
A Crusty Knight Of Colour

A Crusty Knight Of Colour
  • Members
  • 7 475 messages
Who cares about graphics? As long as the animations for the sex scenes and cinematics are fluid, it's good enough for most people.

#109
LOST SPARTANJLC

LOST SPARTANJLC
  • Members
  • 1 201 messages

Nomanor wrote...

Mettyx wrote...

This game is designed for decrepit 7 year old console hardware, consoles don't magically upgrade themselves each year.

Unfortunately this also means that once again consoletards(people who own consoles and buy games for them) have once again ruined a game for PC.
:( :sick:


I agree with you 100% man.

I wish console ****s would just fvck off.


Really ? , we are all gamers here and just want to play a great game.Console can't be blamed for textures not being the best they can be.I just don't the logic here

Modifié par LOST SPARTANJLC, 15 février 2012 - 10:48 .


#110
Genshie

Genshie
  • Members
  • 1 405 messages

Mettyx wrote...

Nomanor wrote...

Anyone else noticed the terrible animations and crap graphics?

in this day and age, this is unacceptable

:(



Unfortunately this also means that once again consoletards(people who own consoles and buy games for them) have once again ruined a game for PC.
:( :sick:

 Mind you it was never made for PC. Everything except for Xbox360 is considered a port here.

#111
FluffyScarf

FluffyScarf
  • Members
  • 948 messages
After Arkham and Uncharted, the ME animations do look stilted. Still, it's a small notch above Lagrim...

#112
twisty77

twisty77
  • Members
  • 541 messages
Aw pobre cito...

It's a DEMO. Get over it. Graphics NEVER look as good in a demo as they do in the final game because of file size restrictions.

#113
CptBomBom00

CptBomBom00
  • Members
  • 3 940 messages
It's ****ING DEMO.

#114
Comsky159

Comsky159
  • Members
  • 1 093 messages

legion999 wrote...

No they look fine.



#115
FFinfinity1

FFinfinity1
  • Members
  • 531 messages
looks like you didn't play the PC version.

#116
THEE_DEATHMASTER

THEE_DEATHMASTER
  • Members
  • 556 messages
I think someone mentioned that the texture sizes are half the size of ME2's. Not sure how true this is but it makes sense for a demo to be downsized in a number of areas.

#117
WaffleCrab

WaffleCrab
  • Members
  • 3 027 messages
I love how people think BW developes games in streamline because its not worth having a PC only dev team. the fact is. They do what any company does no matter what the field of work, find the path of least effort.

And for the comparison on costs of the PC. system over consoles. My pc system is 3 years old, and the cost for the system not counting the PC case, is less than 350€. If you know what your doing, and where to buy your ****, you can build a PC that lasts as long as your console and out performs it. Hell. i burned through 2x 360's and decided not to touch that **** anymore because a third would make my console budget jump, and start eating on my next PC rig budget instead. PS3... just out of the question, costs too much, and games on both x360 and PS3 cost so much more than on PC, that you actually end up paying alot more money for your gaming than you would on PC.

End of the day, it just boils down to fanboyism if you dont know better, when choosing your platform, most people say Consoles are better because they are cheaper and you dont have to install programs on it, but neglect to mention the huge added cost from the games in the total package.

And yes i dont find much bad to say about the graphics, but the main reason you people squable over PC or console, should be the damn controls. That is propably the biggest issue in console ports.

All in All, trying to make people to stop squabling about this thing and help them get over it. See it this way. Consoles are better for you if you dont know how to build your own PC, or if you dont know your way around in the OS's available for PC, or if you simply dont have the patiens to do any of the above.
While PC's are a better option for those who know how to build one, and maintain it. And for those who want to do more with the games than just play it. Hell me personally, i cant name a single game i have not modded myself i bought in the last 4 years. not even C&C 4 was safe from modding :P

Hope people can stop arguing about graphics on pc, graphics that on console. And simply see what BW did with UT engine is impressive considering how much is happening on the screen and background.

#118
Chromie

Chromie
  • Members
  • 9 881 messages

GuardianAngel470 wrote...

Luc0s wrote...

FRANCESCO84Inn wrote...

the real preblem its the console, in this time the pc its more powerfull.


Yeah blame it on the console. :unsure: 

The real problem is not the console, the real problem is the developer using an outdated engine. If you only knew how much a newer engine could do for both platforms, console AND pc.

For example, look at this: 

Posted Image

That my friend, is a screenshot from the XBOX 360 version of The Witcher 2. The game is developed in a very new engine specifically developed for that game; the RED engine. 

Amazing what you can do with a modern and well-tailored engine, isn't it?



But honestly, for an Unreal 3 engine game, Mass Effect 3 looks amazing.


I hope you have the option to turn off Bloom on the 360 version. I never liked in on my PC and all it did was lower my framerate for a feature I didn't like. 


Still looks better than Mass Effect 3. CDProjekt just doesn't take shortcuts like Bioware. The Unreal Engine does support DX10 features (Gears of War 1 on PC)  we don't even get that.

#119
TheLostGenius

TheLostGenius
  • Members
  • 2 548 messages
Well the PC versions will always be better. I'm glaring at you ME1, and your massive amounts of physics based lag that look flawless on the PC. grrrr

#120
Nomanor

Nomanor
  • Members
  • 110 messages

G3rman wrote...

Sorry, some people don't measure there manhoods with PC rigs and how much we can shell out for a build.  Some of us just don't care.


That's the problem. You console tards would still be happy if they threw turds at you, you'd still eat it up, cause you dont care about quality.

You are dumb, lazyass potheads who turn the console on for 1 hour just to pass time while sitting there, drooling, doped out of your mind.

Modifié par Nomanor, 15 février 2012 - 11:13 .


#121
TheOtherTheoG

TheOtherTheoG
  • Members
  • 348 messages
ME3's graphics look absolutely fine, better than 90% of other Unreal 3 games at the very least, some of the textures are still a little low resolution on clothing but certainly no more so than ME2, it's better looking than ME2. The animations are better than ME2's as well. Seriously, people feel the need to **** about everything...

#122
Genshie

Genshie
  • Members
  • 1 405 messages

Nomanor wrote...

G3rman wrote...

Sorry, some people don't measure there manhoods with PC rigs and how much we can shell out for a build.  Some of us just don't care.


That's the problem. You console tards would still be happy if they threw turds at you, you'd still eat it up, cause you dont care about quality.

You are dumb, lazyass potheads who turn the console on for 1 hour just to pass time while sitting there, drooling, doped out of your mind.

 Dude seriously how is this being productive at all? Alot of these post in here are down right offensive. Most of you have turn this thread into a console war which isn't allowed here.

#123
MikkroBitti

MikkroBitti
  • Members
  • 103 messages
The graphics are fine! Just some blurry textures here and there.

#124
Warden130

Warden130
  • Members
  • 898 messages

Nomanor wrote...

That's the problem. You console tards would still be happy if they threw turds at you, you'd still eat it up, cause you dont care about quality.

You are dumb, lazyass potheads who turn the console on for 1 hour just to pass time while sitting there, drooling, doped out of your mind.

Your fanboyism makes me laugh :lol:
Seriously, grow up and learn to tolerate other people's opinions on how they like to play their games.

#125
andy6915

andy6915
  • Members
  • 6 590 messages
Wow, the PC elitists in here are just annoying. I've heard people complain about PC fanboys, and I always wondered why, I thought "how could they be worse then any other fanboy?". Well... I see why now. You guys make other fanboys look outright fun to be around. Trying to scapegoat consoles, bashing everyone that isn't one of their own with petty insults, saying that consoles and console gamers should 'fvck off'.

So you know what, your PC market is already is a dieing industry, it's been spiraling downward for years, which is why you act like this. It's just a bunch of fanboys in denial that their favorite gaming system constantly gets overlooked and is on its way out, so they lash out at everyone and everything like a terrified hamster that has a dog about to eat it. So go ahead, keep bashing consoles and console gamers while you can, because 10 years from now, your favorite market (PC games) will be gone, leaving you to either get over it and buy one of the "oh so terrible consoles", or stop gaming. Either way, at least the constant whining about consoles will end at last.

If you want to know why I just started this rude rant, it's in response to you people. If you actually tried to be even slightly respectful of gamers that own other systems besides yours, I would be respectful back. But no, you decided to completely throw out civility, so I'm just going to respond in kind. Honestly, I'm usually one of the most friendly and respectful people you could ever find on a message board, but reading this topic kind of snapped me.

Modifié par andy69156915, 15 février 2012 - 11:33 .