Ome6ablak wrote...
Maybe, but if getting rid of kinect frees up some space for other things they could have done then I'm for it. Plus I'm not to keen on kinect anyway.
Modifié par N7Infernox, 16 février 2012 - 01:03 .
Then perhaps they should remove some action from having its own button so they can make place for some of the actions assigned on the "do everything" button,or it's about time for consoles to get new controllers.S1L0 wrote...
Alithinos wrote...
The xbox360 version gets Kinect,ps3 and pc versions doesn't get anything to counter-balance this.
Honestly , Kinect adds zero advantage over what I have.
I can do all of that without KINECT - and I can do it MUCH FASTER too.
Modifié par Alithinos, 16 février 2012 - 01:24 .
Exploration? In a Mass Effect game? Come on. Aside from hub levels you're basically just barelling down corridors. The only "exploration" involved is in checking out small alcoves off the beaten path.SynheKatze wrote...
Yeah, this would be a very grateful implementation, and it'd make exploration better. Please consider it bioware, at least for PC users.
N7Infernox wrote...
*sigh* It's not possible. It would take too much memory. Don't you think that they'd have included it if they could? Maybe they could add it to the PC verrsion, but otherwise, you'll just have to deal with it, guys.
Dewart wrote...
I used to holster my weapon and look around in the first two games and I understand it was a nice feature. I however do not believe the ability to holster your weapon is what makes the mass effect series memorable. Holstering your weapon is a tiny almost insignificant feature and to say it is game/immersion breaking is absolutely absurd. The only valid complaint is that it will now be difficult to capture excellent screen shots without shepard in them (very small issue). I would rather Bioware spend their time on perfecting the things that do make the mass effect series memorable.
For anyone who feels that this problem is game/immersion breaking; I feel really bad for you and your lack of imagination.
Dewart wrote...
I used to holster my weapon and look around in the first two games and I understand it was a nice feature. I however do not believe the ability to holster your weapon is what makes the mass effect series memorable. Holstering your weapon is a tiny almost insignificant feature and to say it is game/immersion breaking is absolutely absurd. The only valid complaint is that it will now be difficult to capture excellent screen shots without shepard in them (very small issue). I would rather Bioware spend their time on perfecting the things that do make the mass effect series memorable.
For anyone who feels that this problem is game/immersion breaking; I feel really bad for you and your lack of imagination.
Modifié par dhale1975, 16 février 2012 - 01:18 .
Alithinos wrote...
Then perhaps they should remove some action from having its own button so they can make place for some of the actions assigned on the "do everything" button,or it's about time for consoles to get new controllers.
Especially on the multiplayer that demands faster and constant change of covering spots,running,and healing your squadmates (also done with the same button),it's game-breaking.
Guest_Imperium Alpha_*
Finis Valorum wrote...
Arbalest7 wrote...
Guns will be automatically holstered in non-combat zones just like they were in ME2 and will be automatically out in firefights, where it kind of makes sense for Shepard to have his weapon drawn.
So Shepard will never talk to anyone while inside a "combat zone" in ME3 then"?
The sick Batarian in ME2 for example was placed in a combat zone and you talked to some Salarian workers in another, so are you saying these sorts of things are either not happening at all in ME3 anymore and a very rigid seperation between hub and combat is gonna be enforced?
Or will we, in fact, still talk to at least some characters while inside combat zone and thus be forced to shove our guns in their faces in all of those cases?
If such a very rigid seperation is going to be enforced the game will likely feel unecessarilydumbed downstreamlined to me and in the other case Shep will still look like an idiot half the time they talk to someone.
Imperium Alpha wrote...
Finis Valorum wrote...
Arbalest7 wrote...
Guns will be automatically holstered in non-combat zones just like they were in ME2 and will be automatically out in firefights, where it kind of makes sense for Shepard to have his weapon drawn.
So Shepard will never talk to anyone while inside a "combat zone" in ME3 then"?
The sick Batarian in ME2 for example was placed in a combat zone and you talked to some Salarian workers in another, so are you saying these sorts of things are either not happening at all in ME3 anymore and a very rigid seperation between hub and combat is gonna be enforced?
Or will we, in fact, still talk to at least some characters while inside combat zone and thus be forced to shove our guns in their faces in all of those cases?
If such a very rigid seperation is going to be enforced the game will likely feel unecessarilydumbed downstreamlined to me and in the other case Shep will still look like an idiot half the time they talk to someone.
But... who cares your character put his gun down when the cinematic start... I don't even know if their was an holster button on console in the first place... >.>
Modifié par dhale1975, 16 février 2012 - 01:35 .
BounceDK wrote...
So no exploring places you visit as you will run around with your gun out and put up with horrible fov. Shame on whoever made this ridiculous decision. It's obvious you never played an rpg in your life.
dhale1975 wrote...
Dewart wrote...
I used to holster my weapon and look around in the first two games and I understand it was a nice feature. I however do not believe the ability to holster your weapon is what makes the mass effect series memorable. Holstering your weapon is a tiny almost insignificant feature and to say it is game/immersion breaking is absolutely absurd. The only valid complaint is that it will now be difficult to capture excellent screen shots without shepard in them (very small issue). I would rather Bioware spend their time on perfecting the things that do make the mass effect series memorable.
For anyone who feels that this problem is game/immersion breaking; I feel really bad for you and your lack of imagination.
Lack of imagination? Please. Obviously, there are a LOT of people who disagree with you, as this is a thread for people who SUPPORT holstering. If holstering to take in the scenery, feeling like you can give an "all clear" to your squad then holster, enjoying the FOV, is apart of what makes the game memorable for a lot of people, how can you say it's absurd? Now THAT is absurd.
Dewart wrote...
dhale1975 wrote...
Dewart wrote...
I used to holster my weapon and look around in the first two games and I understand it was a nice feature. I however do not believe the ability to holster your weapon is what makes the mass effect series memorable. Holstering your weapon is a tiny almost insignificant feature and to say it is game/immersion breaking is absolutely absurd. The only valid complaint is that it will now be difficult to capture excellent screen shots without shepard in them (very small issue). I would rather Bioware spend their time on perfecting the things that do make the mass effect series memorable.
For anyone who feels that this problem is game/immersion breaking; I feel really bad for you and your lack of imagination.
Lack of imagination? Please. Obviously, there are a LOT of people who disagree with you, as this is a thread for people who SUPPORT holstering. If holstering to take in the scenery, feeling like you can give an "all clear" to your squad then holster, enjoying the FOV, is apart of what makes the game memorable for a lot of people, how can you say it's absurd? Now THAT is absurd.
Yes lack of imagination. If your decision to praise or condemn a game is banking on if you can holster your weapon or not, then yeah that seems pretty absurd to me.
Weapon holstering fan: "Oh the game played well, had an amazing story, and the graphics were great. I wouldn't recommend it though because you can't holster your weapon."
Gamer that isn't crazy: "Really??? That's um... backward reasoning."
Seriously the cover actions mapped to one button is a bigger deal and it's not even game breaking. Lol I'm the one that's absurd. Well I'm done here I hope you all have fun nitpicking
Modifié par dhale1975, 16 février 2012 - 02:05 .
dhale1975 wrote...
Dewart wrote...
dhale1975 wrote...
Dewart wrote...
I used to holster my weapon and look around in the first two games and I understand it was a nice feature. I however do not believe the ability to holster your weapon is what makes the mass effect series memorable. Holstering your weapon is a tiny almost insignificant feature and to say it is game/immersion breaking is absolutely absurd. The only valid complaint is that it will now be difficult to capture excellent screen shots without shepard in them (very small issue). I would rather Bioware spend their time on perfecting the things that do make the mass effect series memorable.
For anyone who feels that this problem is game/immersion breaking; I feel really bad for you and your lack of imagination.
Lack of imagination? Please. Obviously, there are a LOT of people who disagree with you, as this is a thread for people who SUPPORT holstering. If holstering to take in the scenery, feeling like you can give an "all clear" to your squad then holster, enjoying the FOV, is apart of what makes the game memorable for a lot of people, how can you say it's absurd? Now THAT is absurd.
Yes lack of imagination. If your decision to praise or condemn a game is banking on if you can holster your weapon or not, then yeah that seems pretty absurd to me.
Weapon holstering fan: "Oh the game played well, had an amazing story, and the graphics were great. I wouldn't recommend it though because you can't holster your weapon."
Gamer that isn't crazy: "Really??? That's um... backward reasoning."
Seriously the cover actions mapped to one button is a bigger deal and it's not even game breaking. Lol I'm the one that's absurd. Well I'm done here I hope you all have fun nitpicking
Great, get out. It's obvious you are one of those people who, no matter what silly thing Bio did, was going to purchase the game anyway. Yes, I have a grievance and it's a big one to me.
Modifié par DragonRageGT, 16 février 2012 - 02:40 .
Modifié par Bobbobo14921, 16 février 2012 - 03:42 .
Sashimi_taco wrote...
It is way too late for that.
Retour en haut
