Ce sujet est fermé
Phaedon wrote...
Same thing happenned with TOR, somehow, even if it was generally perceived very well by almost everyone. Not to mention that TOR is a completely different genre than the DA franchise.
Guldhun2 wrote...
Phaedon wrote...
Same thing happenned with TOR, somehow, even if it was generally perceived very well by almost everyone. Not to mention that TOR is a completely different genre than the DA franchise.
It was generally percieved very well by almost every PAID "journalist". It was not generally percieved very well by the people who bought it.
Rockworm503 wrote...
He's talking financially Basically if the game's budget is > how much it sails than it obviously sucked. Which by that logic Skyrim and Portal 2 were the only good games last year
Sia_Sinblade wrote...
Ahh, the good old "If it's a good review, it's paid, if it's a bad review, it is just honest." routine.
Such predictability.
Modifié par Guldhun2, 17 février 2012 - 01:03 .
Baseless.Guldhun2 wrote...
It was generally percieved very well by almost every PAID "journalist". It was not generally percieved very well by the people who bought it.
Guldhun2 wrote...
Sia_Sinblade wrote...
Ahh, the good old "If it's a good review, it's paid, if it's a bad review, it is just honest." routine.
Such predictability.
Check metacritic. User score is a lot lower than paid reviewers.
Are you actually serious with this?Guldhun2 wrote...
Check metacritic. User score is a lot lower than paid reviewers.
Phaedon wrote...
Baseless.Guldhun2 wrote...
It was generally percieved very well by almost every PAID "journalist". It was not generally percieved very well by the people who bought it.
Despite the obvious review boming (lol "0" scores), gaming communities embraced it, even if the same heavily criticized DA2. Here you go, let's find 30-40 negative reviews that actually mention that there are fully voiced campaigns with dialogue choices.
Guldhun2 wrote...
Rockworm503 wrote...
He's talking financially Basically if the game's budget is > how much it sails than it obviously sucked. Which by that logic Skyrim and Portal 2 were the only good games last year
No i'm saying is that if you spend so much money on development of a video game, and all you get is 2 million (or is it 1,7) sales then there's something wrong with your video game.
It only has a 5.9 user score on metacritic. That's not very good.
Guldhun2 wrote...
Phaedon wrote...
Baseless.Guldhun2 wrote...
It was generally percieved very well by almost every PAID "journalist". It was not generally percieved very well by the people who bought it.
Despite the obvious review boming (lol "0" scores), gaming communities embraced it, even if the same heavily criticized DA2. Here you go, let's find 30-40 negative reviews that actually mention that there are fully voiced campaigns with dialogue choices.
But boming (lol "10" scores) is no problem, right?
Sia_Sinblade wrote...
Because no Trolls would ever just create an account (or multiple ones) to Vote 0 on a game they want to bash right? So obviously, Metacritic user scores are a PERFECT indicator of how good a game is.
I was actually waiting for the Metacritic thing. It always pops up right after the paid reviewer thing. XD
Guldhun2 wrote...
Sia_Sinblade wrote...
Because no Trolls would ever just create an account (or multiple ones) to Vote 0 on a game they want to bash right? So obviously, Metacritic user scores are a PERFECT indicator of how good a game is.
I was actually waiting for the Metacritic thing. It always pops up right after the paid reviewer thing. XD
What's sad is that bioware did just the opposit. Bioware employeess made accounts on metacritic and gave Bioware games 10 scores, while giving other companies games 0. But i guess that's not a problem for you.
Guldhun2 wrote...
Sia_Sinblade wrote...
Because no Trolls would ever just create an account (or multiple ones) to Vote 0 on a game they want to bash right? So obviously, Metacritic user scores are a PERFECT indicator of how good a game is.
I was actually waiting for the Metacritic thing. It always pops up right after the paid reviewer thing. XD
What's sad is that bioware did just the opposit. Bioware employeess made accounts on metacritic and gave Bioware games 10 scores, while giving other companies games 0. But i guess that's not a problem for you.
Sia_Sinblade wrote...
Guldhun2 wrote...
Sia_Sinblade wrote...
Because no Trolls would ever just create an account (or multiple ones) to Vote 0 on a game they want to bash right? So obviously, Metacritic user scores are a PERFECT indicator of how good a game is.
I was actually waiting for the Metacritic thing. It always pops up right after the paid reviewer thing. XD
What's sad is that bioware did just the opposit. Bioware employeess made accounts on metacritic and gave Bioware games 10 scores, while giving other companies games 0. But i guess that's not a problem for you.
Again...not helping your point m8.
Your point was that the Metacritic User Score supposedly indicated TOR was bad. Now you've already written two posts that show clearly that the User Score is complete garbage.
Sia_Sinblade wrote...
Again...not helping your point m8.
Your point was that the Metacritic User Score supposedly indicated TOR was bad. Now you've already written two posts that show clearly that the User Score is complete garbage.
Modifié par Guldhun2, 17 février 2012 - 01:11 .
Not with review inflation, no. It is generally wrong to review bomb 10s, but this has been happenning to every single product in every single rating site ever. Review scores are relative. Especially on Metacritic.Guldhun2 wrote...
But boming (lol "10" scores) is no problem, right?
Phaedon wrote...
Not with review inflation, no. It is generally wrong to review bomb 10s, but this has been happenning to every single product in every single rating site ever. Review scores are relative. Especially on Metacritic.Guldhun2 wrote...
But boming (lol "10" scores) is no problem, right?
Downbombing, however, is just catching up with the entirety of metacritic. Which is why I am laughing at your suggestion that it is suspicious that non-professional review scores are lower than professional ones. This has been happenning for the last three months for every game, to say the least.
You are just placing yourself in a tougher spot when you defend bombing zeroes without having played the game by bringing up 10-bombers.
Robhuzz wrote...
I know right? Some people should learn that just because they scream hard enough their opinion does not equal the truth.
Guldhun2 wrote...
Sia_Sinblade wrote...
Again...not helping your point m8.
Your point was that the Metacritic User Score supposedly indicated TOR was bad. Now you've already written two posts that show clearly that the User Score is complete garbage.
Wrong, although there's fake user scrores on Metacritic, in the end those are negligible. Look at the user score for Skyrim. There's a lot of 0s, yet it still has an average 8+ score.
Guldhun2 wrote...
Sia_Sinblade wrote...
Again...not helping your point m8.
Your point was that the Metacritic User Score supposedly indicated TOR was bad. Now you've already written two posts that show clearly that the User Score is complete garbage.
Wrong, although there's fake user scrores on Metacritic, in the end those are neglible. Look at the user score for Skyrim. There's a lot of 0s, yet it still has an average 8+ score.
TLK Spires wrote...
personally, im still just as excited as ive ever been. the demo enhanced that, actually.
Sia_Sinblade wrote...
P.S.: Skyrim is an overhyped run-of-the-mill average game. Play Morrowind or Daggerfall if you want a game where they still knew what they were doing.
Modifié par Guldhun2, 17 février 2012 - 01:15 .
You like betilating people who doesn't share your sentinement to ME3?Guldhun2 wrote...
TLK Spires wrote...
personally, im still just as excited as ive ever been. the demo enhanced that, actually.
You like bad writing, bad animations, no weapon holstering, 2d sprites, bad textures on clothing, bad controls, and dumbed down gameplay?
Guldhun2 wrote...
Retour en haut
