Obviously with image interpolation it would bring out the faults and errors or mistakes they make on the final cut..
Where it shines is where there is smoke/steam/lighting/or blowing dirt/sand and such.
Another factor is where the reflection or mirrored objects.. lets say a car driving by with a highly reflective shiny surface or chrome. The little details that simply cannot be seen or appreciated are simply NOT there due to the low frame rate, the brain accepts this as being "good enough" but presented with either image interpolation which is a poor mans attempt at higher frame rate which DOES improve things in that case making your mind able to comprehend more detail, noticing things you'd NEVER be able to see at all prior.
Catching details of say the camera men being reflected shown in specific scenes even if you had watched it many times prior and only now just noticed due to the extra frame rate does have it's drawback... it means producers and film screws and the studios responsible can't slack at all anymore. Mistakes or saying "screw it" on the mistakes they make will just show up more obvious then ever on these types of tvs.
Also keep in mind that many tvs do not do image interpolation at all, some just do frame doubling for 120hz or quading for 240hz tvs (and higher) without any significant change to the appearance of the video at all, some tvs insert a solid black image between each frame for their 120hz models or do more exotic things that doesn't take any processing power for higher models.
Playing back standard definition video using image interpolation can look very ugly at times due to the inherit Artifacts and well.... stretching of the original resolutions to the common 1080p standards or larger (2160p) displays.
Personal Preferrence however is what it is... I know someone very well that utterly HATED the function of image interpolation. He also argued the same thing and repeatedly made it clear how much he disliked it. However interestingly, he utterly LOVES it for sports and specific cases. Specially when used to watch something like a 3D Animated movie or show, or in specific cases for TV shows. He used identical valid arguments and explanations as to why he hated it so much otherwise. However one day...... about a year and 2 after using it off and on.... he sat down after having left it on the previous day, and said it just clicked.... he rarely turned it off for about a year.... and just recently now after owning the tv for over 3 years...... just doesn't touch it at all unless something is REALLY sticking out and bothering him. VHS tapes seem to do the trick of forcing one to disable it due to all the artifacts and disgustingness.
Fact of the matter is..... 60fps is only the start, with 120hz standards being reached and more and more 120hz monitors coming onto the market, more and more films will be making their change to 60fps where they can..... Mostly due to the advantages of running 120hz/60fps for 3D applications (as 30fps/24fps isn't good enough due to splitting the frame rate in half for each eye.. at which point this is why most people have headaches, 12-15fps per eye is noticeably irritating for the eye.... it's watchable. .but badly....doubling this value will fix it right up)
Modifié par DHJudas, 28 mars 2012 - 04:12 .
Guest_AwesomeName_*
Retour en haut
