245 réponses à ce sujet

[JonnyOwen]

Oh look, people who care about Graphics. Yawn.

[N7Raider]

Ohei wrote...

N7Raider wrote...

omg the PS3 possibly gets short changed one time and of course someone has to bring it up, Mafia II, Assassin's Creed, Dead Space, BioShock, Battlefield 3, the PS3 version of ME2 all got free extra content that the 360 version of those games lacked. We all payed $60 for the games but for whatever reason PS3 owners get extra dlc free that 360 owners either have to pay separately for or never get. The comparison you brought up is nothing, the graphical differences are unnoticeable it's not like the 360 version is getting free dlc like PS3 versions of games so often get.

You missed the point. Entirely.

No you failed to realize mine, you want the same quality game, you think you're getting short changed.  The example you brought up had no notable difference, you are not getting short changed because the 360 version isn't getting anything extra like so many other PS3 titles.  

Modifié par N7Raider, 16 février 2012 - 05:35 .

[Ohei]

JonnyOwen wrote...

Oh look, people who care about Graphics. Yawn.

Maybe if you had bothered to read the first post, you would realize this is mainly about framerate issues, not graphics. Yawn.

[Calibrationmaster]

N7Raider wrote...

Ohei wrote...

N7Raider wrote...

omg the PS3 possibly gets short changed one time and of course someone has to bring it up, Mafia II, Assassin's Creed, Dead Space, BioShock, Battlefield 3, the PS3 version of ME2 all got free extra content that the 360 version of those games lacked. We all payed $60 for the games but for whatever reason PS3 owners get extra dlc free that 360 owners either have to pay separately for or never get. The comparison you brought up is nothing, the graphical differences are unnoticeable it's not like the 360 version is getting free dlc like PS3 versions of games so often get.

You missed the point. Entirely.

No you failed to realize mine, you want the same quality game, you think you're getting short changed.  The example you brought up had no notable difference, you are not getting short changed because the 360 version isn't getting anything extra like so many other PS3 titles.  

the FRAMERATE IS HORRIBLE ON PS3 , DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM? ffs man

[Ohei]

N7Raider wrote...

Ohei wrote...

N7Raider wrote...

omg the PS3 possibly gets short changed one time and of course someone has to bring it up, Mafia II, Assassin's Creed, Dead Space, BioShock, Battlefield 3, the PS3 version of ME2 all got free extra content that the 360 version of those games lacked. We all payed $60 for the games but for whatever reason PS3 owners get extra dlc free that 360 owners either have to pay separately for or never get. The comparison you brought up is nothing, the graphical differences are unnoticeable it's not like the 360 version is getting free dlc like PS3 versions of games so often get.

You missed the point. Entirely.

No you failed to realize mine, you want the same quality game, you think you're getting short changed.  The example you brought up had no notable difference, you are not getting short changed because the 360 version isn't getting anything extra like so many other PS3 titles.  

You're kidding, right? There is exclusive content for the Xbox version not featured for the PS3 in ME3. It's not the other way around. I don't give a flying elcor about such exclusive content, though, but at least bother to get your facts straight.

Besides, this truly is not about exclusive content, or early Xbox demo access, or anything of the sort. This is about the framerate the PS3 version of the game is presenting.

If you hold a grudge against Sony, take it somewhere else. We really don't feel like hearing it. Thanks.

[Kingofthebonggo]

It's a port...deal with it or buy an Xbox. Your gripe is with EA not funding the port development more, not with Bioware or ME3 as a game. So you have two options, whine and pound your fists like an 8 year old or get excited about playing the epic conclusion to one of the best sci-fi trilogies across media on the hardware you already own, even though at the beginning it was not intended to be available for it.

[someone else]

You console types need to look a bit farther than the ends of your controllers - when - the console companies upgrade the processors in your favorite toys as they will w/in the next 2-3 years, you'll be outdoing us pc'ers in screaming foul when your games do not take advantage of the additional power and graphics - you'll rail at devs for lagging in implementing new standards and catering to the installed base - you are unquestionably correct that consoles rule the gaming world - you are myopic in failing to understand our frustration with the wholly artificial limitations that imposes on the gaming experience

Modifié par someone else, 16 février 2012 - 05:44 .

[N7Raider]

Ohei wrote...

N7Raider wrote...

Ohei wrote...

N7Raider wrote...

omg the PS3 possibly gets short changed one time and of course someone has to bring it up, Mafia II, Assassin's Creed, Dead Space, BioShock, Battlefield 3, the PS3 version of ME2 all got free extra content that the 360 version of those games lacked. We all payed $60 for the games but for whatever reason PS3 owners get extra dlc free that 360 owners either have to pay separately for or never get. The comparison you brought up is nothing, the graphical differences are unnoticeable it's not like the 360 version is getting free dlc like PS3 versions of games so often get.

You missed the point. Entirely.

No you failed to realize mine, you want the same quality game, you think you're getting short changed.  The example you brought up had no notable difference, you are not getting short changed because the 360 version isn't getting anything extra like so many other PS3 titles.  

You're kidding, right? There is exclusive content for the Xbox version not featured for the PS3 in ME3. It's not the other way around. I don't give a flying elcor about such exclusive content, though, but at least bother to get your facts straight.

Besides, this truly is not about exclusive content, or early Xbox demo access, or anything of the sort. This is about the framerate the PS3 version of the game is presenting.

If you hold a grudge against Sony, take it somewhere else. We really don't feel like hearing it. Thanks.

What you mean kinect?  I'm not talking about kinect I'm talking about dlc, extra characters or missions.  ME3 on 360 has no significant extra dlc that the PS3 version isn't getting unless you count the chakram launcher and extra armor to be significant.  As for the framerate, why would the framerate be any worse on the PS3 when ME2 on PS3 was already running on the ME3 engine?
You're assumption is beyond idiotic, at what point once have I ever brought up a damn thing about Sony?  Really can you lend me your super intrinsic analytical prowess so I can see where I ever once brought up Sony?  The only thing I ever said was PS3 games get free dlc that 360 versions don't get, never once did I say this was Sony's fault or anything about Sony.  If you're gonna try to end your post with some snide little remark at least say something of value not some arbitrary crap assumption you pulled out of nowhere.  

[Favourite store on the CitadeI]

N7Raider wrote...

Ohei wrote...

N7Raider wrote...

omg the PS3 possibly gets short changed one time and of course someone has to bring it up, Mafia II, Assassin's Creed, Dead Space, BioShock, Battlefield 3, the PS3 version of ME2 all got free extra content that the 360 version of those games lacked. We all payed $60 for the games but for whatever reason PS3 owners get extra dlc free that 360 owners either have to pay separately for or never get. The comparison you brought up is nothing, the graphical differences are unnoticeable it's not like the 360 version is getting free dlc like PS3 versions of games so often get.

You missed the point. Entirely.

No you failed to realize mine, you want the same quality game, you think you're getting short changed.  The example you brought up had no notable difference, you are not getting short changed because the 360 version isn't getting anything extra like so many other PS3 titles.  

PS3 owners never ASK for that "DLC". What the OP is trying to say is, if he's to buy that game, he wants a good solid answer that the actual game will be up to scratch. 

[Chuck Fandango]

Fix1o0 wrote...

Consoles are holding back the true potential video games could be on PC.

PC's are for work & the internet!

*walks away from flamewar slowly* 

Modifié par Chuck Fandango, 16 février 2012 - 05:49 .

[Ohei]

lol, man. Console/PC wars was an inevitable thing, I guess.

Ah, BSN. I tried.

[LinksOcarina]

They look the same to me...

Maybe I am missing something, or I just don't care.

[Kingofthebonggo]

someone else wrote...

You console types need to look a bit farther than the ends of your controllers - when - the console companies upgrade the processors in your favorite toys as they will w/in the next 2-3 years, you'll be outdoing us pc'ers in screaming foul when your games do not take advantage of the additional power and graphics - you'll rail at devs for lagging in implementing new standards and catering to the installed base - you are unquestionably correct that consoles rule the gaming world - you are myopic in failing to understand our frustration with the wholly artificial limitations that imposes on the gaming experience

Honestly, it's capitalism plain and simple. It saves money to cut certain corners, and porting is usually a big one. You can buy the content or not. Whining in these forums isn't going to change the way the machine works. I totally understand why people are annoyed by the fact that we are not experiencing the best version of ME possible at this point in time given the technology realistically available, however that's just the way it is. Now, do you play the conclusion or do you spend your money on something else?

[Ohei]

Kingofthebonggo wrote...

someone else wrote...

You console types need to look a bit farther than the ends of your controllers - when - the console companies upgrade the processors in your favorite toys as they will w/in the next 2-3 years, you'll be outdoing us pc'ers in screaming foul when your games do not take advantage of the additional power and graphics - you'll rail at devs for lagging in implementing new standards and catering to the installed base - you are unquestionably correct that consoles rule the gaming world - you are myopic in failing to understand our frustration with the wholly artificial limitations that imposes on the gaming experience

Honestly, it's capitalism plain and simple. It saves money to cut certain corners, and porting is usually a big one. You can buy the content or not. Whining in these forums isn't going to change the way the machine works. I totally understand why people are annoyed by the fact that we are not experiencing the best version of ME possible at this point in time given the technology realistically available, however that's just the way it is. Now, do you play the conclusion or do you spend your money on something else?

I never said I am not going to buy the game. I love ME. That is why I am not giving up on it.

It's not a thing of, ''Don't like how it was ported, don't buy it.''

I love this franchise. It's available in a console that I own. Why can't I experience it without the framerate lagging everytime I try to shoot a husk?

All I was looking for here is word from a dev because they seem to be avoiding the matter, even through PMs. I've been saying this repeatedly, in the name of others as well, we just wanted a little reassurance.
It's a demo port. Final retail version will perform better.

If that's the case, we really want someone from BW to take a stand and tell us so.

That's all.

Modifié par Ohei, 16 février 2012 - 05:56 .

[Chuck Fandango]

someone else wrote...

You console types need to look a bit farther than the ends of your controllers - when - the console companies upgrade the processors in your favorite toys as they will w/in the next 2-3 years, you'll be outdoing us pc'ers in screaming foul when your games do not take advantage of the additional power and graphics - you'll rail at devs for lagging in implementing new standards and catering to the installed base - you are unquestionably correct that consoles rule the gaming world - you are myopic in failing to understand our frustration with the wholly artificial limitations that imposes on the gaming experience

This could almost be a speech by Harbinger if you said it in "his" voice! 

[N7Raider]

Favourite store on the CitadeI wrote...

N7Raider wrote...

Ohei wrote...

N7Raider wrote...

omg the PS3 possibly gets short changed one time and of course someone has to bring it up, Mafia II, Assassin's Creed, Dead Space, BioShock, Battlefield 3, the PS3 version of ME2 all got free extra content that the 360 version of those games lacked. We all payed $60 for the games but for whatever reason PS3 owners get extra dlc free that 360 owners either have to pay separately for or never get. The comparison you brought up is nothing, the graphical differences are unnoticeable it's not like the 360 version is getting free dlc like PS3 versions of games so often get.

You missed the point. Entirely.

No you failed to realize mine, you want the same quality game, you think you're getting short changed.  The example you brought up had no notable difference, you are not getting short changed because the 360 version isn't getting anything extra like so many other PS3 titles.  

PS3 owners never ASK for that "DLC". What the OP is trying to say is, if he's to buy that game, he wants a good solid answer that the actual game will be up to scratch. 

oh gawsh you're right I take everything back because PS3 owners never asked for dlc!  I'm so sawry PS3 owners.  You know what tell me this, at what point did I ever even suggest this?  At what point did I ever say "but they only get it cause PS3 owners ask for it"?  Oh that's right I never said that!  In what world does this have any relevance to what I said, the PS3 versions still get free extra content, simple as that.  Whether PS3 owners ask for it or not is BEYOND irrelevant.   

[horizon011]

Consoles why plague us.

[Calibrationmaster]

Chuck Fandango wrote...

someone else wrote...

You console types need to look a bit farther than the ends of your controllers - when - the console companies upgrade the processors in your favorite toys as they will w/in the next 2-3 years, you'll be outdoing us pc'ers in screaming foul when your games do not take advantage of the additional power and graphics - you'll rail at devs for lagging in implementing new standards and catering to the installed base - you are unquestionably correct that consoles rule the gaming world - you are myopic in failing to understand our frustration with the wholly artificial limitations that imposes on the gaming experience

This could almost be a speech by Harbinger if you said it in "his" voice! 

i think is more a speech of an inteernet troll

[Kingofthebonggo]

Ohei wrote...

Kingofthebonggo wrote...

someone else wrote...

You console types need to look a bit farther than the ends of your controllers - when - the console companies upgrade the processors in your favorite toys as they will w/in the next 2-3 years, you'll be outdoing us pc'ers in screaming foul when your games do not take advantage of the additional power and graphics - you'll rail at devs for lagging in implementing new standards and catering to the installed base - you are unquestionably correct that consoles rule the gaming world - you are myopic in failing to understand our frustration with the wholly artificial limitations that imposes on the gaming experience

Honestly, it's capitalism plain and simple. It saves money to cut certain corners, and porting is usually a big one. You can buy the content or not. Whining in these forums isn't going to change the way the machine works. I totally understand why people are annoyed by the fact that we are not experiencing the best version of ME possible at this point in time given the technology realistically available, however that's just the way it is. Now, do you play the conclusion or do you spend your money on something else?

I never said I am not going to buy the game. I love ME. That is why I am not giving up on it.

It's not a thing of, ''Don't like how it was ported, don't buy it.''

I love this franchise. It's available in a console that I own. Why can't I experience it without the framerate lagging everytime I try to shoot a husk?

All I was looking for here is word from a dev because they seem to be avoiding the matter, even through PMs. I've been saying this repeatedly, in the name of others as well, we just wanted a little reassurance.
It's a demo port. Final retail version will perform better.

If that's the case, we really want someone from BW to take a stand and tell us so.

That's all.

While I recognize that, do you think they're going to publicly say "we wanted to resolve those issues before launch but EA said screw it, you need to stick to the March 6th deadline and do whatever you can with patching once it's out"?

[Ohei]

Kingofthebonggo wrote...

Ohei wrote...

Kingofthebonggo wrote...

someone else wrote...

You console types need to look a bit farther than the ends of your controllers - when - the console companies upgrade the processors in your favorite toys as they will w/in the next 2-3 years, you'll be outdoing us pc'ers in screaming foul when your games do not take advantage of the additional power and graphics - you'll rail at devs for lagging in implementing new standards and catering to the installed base - you are unquestionably correct that consoles rule the gaming world - you are myopic in failing to understand our frustration with the wholly artificial limitations that imposes on the gaming experience

Honestly, it's capitalism plain and simple. It saves money to cut certain corners, and porting is usually a big one. You can buy the content or not. Whining in these forums isn't going to change the way the machine works. I totally understand why people are annoyed by the fact that we are not experiencing the best version of ME possible at this point in time given the technology realistically available, however that's just the way it is. Now, do you play the conclusion or do you spend your money on something else?

I never said I am not going to buy the game. I love ME. That is why I am not giving up on it.

It's not a thing of, ''Don't like how it was ported, don't buy it.''

I love this franchise. It's available in a console that I own. Why can't I experience it without the framerate lagging everytime I try to shoot a husk?

All I was looking for here is word from a dev because they seem to be avoiding the matter, even through PMs. I've been saying this repeatedly, in the name of others as well, we just wanted a little reassurance.
It's a demo port. Final retail version will perform better.

If that's the case, we really want someone from BW to take a stand and tell us so.

That's all.

While I recognize that, do you think they're going to publicly say "we wanted to resolve those issues before launch but EA said screw it, you need to stick to the March 6th deadline and do whatever you can with patching once it's out"?

If it's the truth, yes, at least I'd like them to. Bad marketing move, but if they are true to their word, they will patch it soon enough.

I want to know if my 120 bucks will give me at least a framerate like the one ME2 had. It wasn't really that great at all, but it didn't break the immersion.

Modifié par Ohei, 16 février 2012 - 06:03 .

[Yumi50]

How come it's $130 btw?

[Favourite store on the CitadeI]

N7Raider wrote...

Favourite store on the CitadeI wrote...

N7Raider wrote...

Ohei wrote...

N7Raider wrote...

omg the PS3 possibly gets short changed one time and of course someone has to bring it up, Mafia II, Assassin's Creed, Dead Space, BioShock, Battlefield 3, the PS3 version of ME2 all got free extra content that the 360 version of those games lacked. We all payed $60 for the games but for whatever reason PS3 owners get extra dlc free that 360 owners either have to pay separately for or never get. The comparison you brought up is nothing, the graphical differences are unnoticeable it's not like the 360 version is getting free dlc like PS3 versions of games so often get.

You missed the point. Entirely.

No you failed to realize mine, you want the same quality game, you think you're getting short changed.  The example you brought up had no notable difference, you are not getting short changed because the 360 version isn't getting anything extra like so many other PS3 titles.  

PS3 owners never ASK for that "DLC". What the OP is trying to say is, if he's to buy that game, he wants a good solid answer that the actual game will be up to scratch. 

oh gawsh you're right I take everything back because PS3 owners never asked for dlc!  I'm so sawry PS3 owners.  You know what tell me this, at what point did I ever even suggest this?  At what point did I ever say "but they only get it cause PS3 owners ask for it"?  Oh that's right I never said that!  In what world does this have any relevance to what I said, the PS3 versions still get free extra content, simple as that.  Whether PS3 owners ask for it or not is BEYOND irrelevant.   

Ok, let me add a few more words on the end for you to comprehend what I'm saying; 
You said XB360 users had to pay 60 for extra content which you didnt get free, would it have made you happier if we didn't get it? What I'm saying is, PS3 users of ME2 didn't moan to the devs saying OMG I DONT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED IN ME1 GIVE ME SOMETHING WHICH WILL EXPLAIN WHAT HAPPENED IN PRETTY PICTURES PLEAAAAAASE (as far as I'm aware). Truth be told, I'm sure anyone with a half decent brain and listens to what the characters are saying, can get the general gist of what happened in ME1.

[Descy_]

Yumi50 wrote...

How come it's $130 btw?

Where do you live?

[Ohei]

Yumi50 wrote...

How come it's $130 btw?

I live in Argentina. Videogames are really, really expensive.