Ohei wrote...
Kingofthebonggo wrote...
Ohei wrote...
Kingofthebonggo wrote...
someone else wrote...
You console types need to look a bit farther than the ends of your controllers - when - the console companies upgrade the processors in your favorite toys as they will w/in the next 2-3 years, you'll be outdoing us pc'ers in screaming foul when your games do not take advantage of the additional power and graphics - you'll rail at devs for lagging in implementing new standards and catering to the installed base - you are unquestionably correct that consoles rule the gaming world - you are myopic in failing to understand our frustration with the wholly artificial limitations that imposes on the gaming experience
Honestly, it's capitalism plain and simple. It saves money to cut certain corners, and porting is usually a big one. You can buy the content or not. Whining in these forums isn't going to change the way the machine works. I totally understand why people are annoyed by the fact that we are not experiencing the best version of ME possible at this point in time given the technology realistically available, however that's just the way it is. Now, do you play the conclusion or do you spend your money on something else?
I never said I am not going to buy the game. I love ME. That is why I am not giving up on it.
It's not a thing of, ''Don't like how it was ported, don't buy it.''
I love this franchise. It's available in a console that I own. Why can't I experience it without the framerate lagging everytime I try to shoot a husk?
All I was looking for here is word from a dev because they seem to be avoiding the matter, even through PMs. I've been saying this repeatedly, in the name of others as well, we just wanted a little reassurance.
It's a demo port. Final retail version will perform better.
If that's the case, we really want someone from BW to take a stand and tell us so.
That's all.
While I recognize that, do you think they're going to publicly say "we wanted to resolve those issues before launch but EA said screw it, you need to stick to the March 6th deadline and do whatever you can with patching once it's out"?
If it's the truth, yes, at least I'd like them to. Bad marketing move, but if they are true to their word, they will patch it soon enough.
I want to know if my 120 bucks will give me at least a framerate like the one ME2 had. It wasn't really that great at all, but it didn't break the immersion.
I understand, but this will likely suffer from a similar debacle as Skyrim. It'll be a known issue pre-release and they're going to work on it afterward but nothing will be mentioned until all pre-orders ship and they get their initial release revenue to decide on how much effort to put into polishing it (i.e. the effort they put into polishing the PS3 version in this case will depend on the number of consumers who purchase that version within the first week or two of release). This is the downside to patching, conglomerates like EA can force a game out before all issues are resolved and the polish usually comes within 3-6 months after release.
Retour en haut
You know what tell me this, at what point did I ever even suggest this? At what point did I ever say "but they only get it cause PS3 owners ask for it"? Oh that's right I never said that! In what world does this have any relevance to what I said, the PS3 versions still get free extra content, simple as that. Whether PS3 owners ask for it or not is BEYOND irrelevant. 
