17 réponses à ce sujet

[GamerrangerX]

Mass effect 3 Demo smell like chocolate cake but it tastes like water,that how i feel about ME3 demo,i been waiting for weeks,even lose some sleep,go to work late,i was so excited to play the Mass Effect 3 demo but after i finish playing a was like:Meh!"overall",guess i hold up the CE and wait for a good review.

[111987]

GamerrangerX wrote...

Mass effect 3 Demo smell like chocolate cake but it tastes like water,that how i feel about ME3 demo,i been waiting for weeks,even lose some sleep,go to work late,i was so excited to play the Mass Effect 3 demo but after i finish playing a was like:Meh!"overall",guess i hold up the CE and wait for a good review.

If that's how you felt, that is quite a logical, rational course of action.

[warcry08]

Well i could say same about SP, but MP. DAAAM.

[RedWulfi]

i got nothing bad to say about it, im not picky.

[dreman9999]

Maybe it because it's a demo and just focus in showing gameplay , not story.

[Geowil]

dreman9999 wrote...

Maybe it because it's a demo and just focus in showing gameplay , not story.

That was my first thought as well.  They should have labled it a 'technical' demo.  Tech demo's are more about showing mechanics and engine changes and less about graphics and story, which describes this demo perfectly.

The people being let down were expecting it to be a carbon copy of what to expect in the release version.  We do not even know when this demo was made, it may have been from last month or even last year before they bumped the release date back.

Too many unknowns to explcitily tie the quality of the demo to the quality of the gold version imo.

Modifié par Geowil, 16 février 2012 - 09:54 .

[10K]

I loved it especially the new combat. sooo....awesome!!!!

[sp0ck 06]

The chocolate cake is the MP

[I_Jedi]

But I like the taste of water.

[Bundok]

 Even as a "Technical Demo", as some are putting it, I wasn't impressed at all. Having played through both ME1 and ME2, both previous games felt a lot less "clunky" to play. My biggest pet peeve being the one-button-rules-all method of game play. It's just not coded well. Jumping to cover when I want to sprint just because I happen to be too close to a cover spot. Leaping from cover to cover when all I want to do is leave cover and run from the grenade next to me... I could go on, but you get the point. I'm quite disappointed.

That aside, the graphics don't look good to me at all. The animations aren't fluid, the conversations timing is off and the mouths... don't get me started on the mouths.

[geckosentme]

Bundok wrote...

That aside, the graphics don't look good to me at all. The animations aren't fluid, the conversations timing is off and the mouths... don't get me started on the mouths.

Yeah, I dont' quite understand the call to ditch the previous emotive/speech rig which was fine, we all knew Shep had teeth, don't need to see em, don't care.

[Wynne]

There is ample hope, though. Like Geowil was saying, a lot of the time demos like this one are made about a year in advance, just rushed to get everything in place so that magazines can write articles about it. What've we been seeing in articles all this time? Sur'Kesh and Earth. So I think this demo has to be a pretty old build that was spruced up a bit. I just question the value of such a demo when it's not representative of the quality of the final game.

Shepard's anims in the cutscene running towards the Normandy are so much better than the choppy, fake-looking ones just before it. They've still got it, they just had to have more time to put it in the game.

[Frailstrength]

This is the exact same demo that was at E3 almost a year ago (at least SP). It might be my eyes, but I am pretty sure there is a polish difference in the MP portion. As for the cover mechanics, I experienced the same problem at first, but I got used to it the second time around. Now I feel it's a stronger game than either of the first two.

[Sarah_SR2]

Well, it looks as if many people have started to write this game off before it even hits the shelves ( It's a demo so I'd say let's wait and see what the real version is like and judge the game then. If BioWare had simply spammed out ME2 with new levels and a few new weapons and powers then people would complain that they'd spent two years doing very little! It's ME3 and they've had to give it its own identity. Now this may be a downer for those of you who hate it, but the date stamp of the demo exe on my laptop is something like January 18 2012 (can't remember the exact time/date as my laptop is at home) so maybe the build is quite new and therefore based on the code that is now gold. I liked of the version they showed at the E3 2011 last June but overall I was very happy with the demo and enjoyed playing it. I'm not sure I appreciate the changes they've made to the HUD such as the enemy health bar and shep's new health/shield meter...

[Cyberarmy]

Well water is much more healthier than cake of course.

İ dont see any problem

Joking aside my only problem with DEMO is multifunctional space(A/X) key.
They really should bind "use" to another button.

[sorentoft]

It's just a demo - it is not an indication of the final game or the story for that matter. It is there to show off some of the basic mechanics so people might get interested and buy the game. Honestly I think the demo is really good, especially the multiplayer (not much reason to play SP if you cannot play all of it). Sure it is not on Crusader Kings 2 demo level, but it is still a good demo, and let us be honest here: a demo is better than no demo at all.

[FifthFeedom729]

Bundok wrote...

 Even as a "Technical Demo", as some are putting it, I wasn't impressed at all. Having played through both ME1 and ME2, both previous games felt a lot less "clunky" to play. My biggest pet peeve being the one-button-rules-all method of game play. It's just not coded well. Jumping to cover when I want to sprint just because I happen to be too close to a cover spot. Leaping from cover to cover when all I want to do is leave cover and run from the grenade next to me... I could go on, but you get the point. I'm quite disappointed.

That aside, the graphics don't look good to me at all. The animations aren't fluid, the conversations timing is off and the mouths... don't get me started on the mouths.

Deal with it.

Edit: sorry, just reading through the forums seems to be a lot of hate and disappointment flowing around. I for one am still looking forward to March 6 despite the problems seen in the demo. But ur right the animation's did seem off to me to, I hope it's just the demo. Not the game

[Shahadem]

OH well.

At least they finally admitted that the "heat cartridges" are really just ammo afterall. Never mind how that craps on ME 1 lore.