Migrant Fleet refuses Council inspectors - Alliance News Network
#51
Posté 17 février 2012 - 11:52
#52
Posté 17 février 2012 - 11:54
#53
Posté 17 février 2012 - 11:58
#54
Posté 18 février 2012 - 12:05
#55
Posté 18 février 2012 - 12:06
Almostfaceman wrote...
Huh kinda brings home that the Quarians are technically not a Council race. The Quarians are gearing up for war with the Geth I'm sure the Council is nervous about spill-over. Silly Quarians, my Shepard preached peace, why for they not listen to me?
Besides the normandy's crew, Anderson and to some small extent Hacket, who else listen to Shepard? Nobody from what I know...
#56
Posté 18 février 2012 - 01:07
#57
Posté 18 février 2012 - 01:10
Modifié par RUDAL, 18 février 2012 - 01:13 .
#58
Posté 18 février 2012 - 01:17
#59
Posté 18 février 2012 - 01:23
#60
Posté 18 février 2012 - 01:28
#61
Posté 18 février 2012 - 01:29
The "writer" of that article, it's Chobot's character?
#62
Posté 18 février 2012 - 01:36
#63
Posté 18 février 2012 - 01:48
Randy1083 wrote...
I'm not the biggest quarian supporter (I think they play the victim card a bit too much), but good on them for sticking it to the Council. Booting a species off of the Citadel and then still expecting them to follow the Citadel's laws is the height of arrogance and hypocrisy.
Considering what the quarians did to get kicked off the council in the first place...
I find it understandable why they aren't popular with their galactic neighbors and why many species would find this turn of events worrisome.
#64
Posté 18 février 2012 - 01:51
#65
Posté 18 février 2012 - 01:51
Yeah someone needed to tell the council to GTFO.
#66
Posté 18 février 2012 - 01:57
Eradyn wrote...
Randy1083 wrote...
I'm not the biggest quarian supporter (I think they play the victim card a bit too much), but good on them for sticking it to the Council. Booting a species off of the Citadel and then still expecting them to follow the Citadel's laws is the height of arrogance and hypocrisy.
Considering what the quarians did to get kicked off the council in the first place...
I find it understandable why they aren't popular with their galactic neighbors and why many species would find this turn of events worrisome.
Well the quarians are not part of council space, so they dont have to uphold their laws or subject themselves to any kind of control from them. Others can be worried but they cant pretend to have any right to inspect their ships or have any control of what they do.
#67
Posté 18 février 2012 - 02:03
Jog0907 wrote...
Eradyn wrote...
Randy1083 wrote...
I'm not the biggest quarian supporter (I think they play the victim card a bit too much), but good on them for sticking it to the Council. Booting a species off of the Citadel and then still expecting them to follow the Citadel's laws is the height of arrogance and hypocrisy.
Considering what the quarians did to get kicked off the council in the first place...
I find it understandable why they aren't popular with their galactic neighbors and why many species would find this turn of events worrisome.
Well the quarians are not part of council space, so they dont have to uphold their laws or subject themselves to any kind of control from them. Others can be worried but they cant pretend to have any right to inspect their ships or have any control of what they do.
They tried to commit genocide. The rest of civilization has every right to interject itself in extreme cases like that.
Modifié par Abirn, 18 février 2012 - 02:04 .
#68
Posté 18 février 2012 - 02:11
Jog0907 wrote...
Eradyn wrote...
Randy1083 wrote...
I'm not the biggest quarian supporter (I think they play the victim card a bit too much), but good on them for sticking it to the Council. Booting a species off of the Citadel and then still expecting them to follow the Citadel's laws is the height of arrogance and hypocrisy.
Considering what the quarians did to get kicked off the council in the first place...
I find it understandable why they aren't popular with their galactic neighbors and why many species would find this turn of events worrisome.
Well the quarians are not part of council space, so they dont have to uphold their laws or subject themselves to any kind of control from them. Others can be worried but they cant pretend to have any right to inspect their ships or have any control of what they do.
Quarian history and what you just said right there...would be part of the reason other species would have every right to be worried. The quarians have a history chock-full of pretty negative relations with the rest of galactic society...add on that layer of "we don't have to listen/do what you say/be diplomatic citizens of galactic society, neener neener *waves big guns and beats war drums*" is not going to be a comforting situation. Loose cannons with loose cannons = galactic unease.
Modifié par Eradyn, 18 février 2012 - 02:13 .
#69
Posté 18 février 2012 - 02:13
Abirn wrote...
Jog0907 wrote...
Eradyn wrote...
Randy1083 wrote...
I'm not the biggest quarian supporter (I think they play the victim card a bit too much), but good on them for sticking it to the Council. Booting a species off of the Citadel and then still expecting them to follow the Citadel's laws is the height of arrogance and hypocrisy.
Considering what the quarians did to get kicked off the council in the first place...
I find it understandable why they aren't popular with their galactic neighbors and why many species would find this turn of events worrisome.
Well the quarians are not part of council space, so they dont have to uphold their laws or subject themselves to any kind of control from them. Others can be worried but they cant pretend to have any right to inspect their ships or have any control of what they do.
They tried to commit genocide. The rest of civilization has every right to interject itself in extreme cases like that.
They would if quarians were part of the council, they are not. The rest of civilization has no right to intervene in their matters since that its a strict geth-quarian issue.
Also the hatred towards quarians is not for trying to exterminate the geth is because of creating them.
#70
Posté 18 février 2012 - 02:24
Eradyn wrote...
Jog0907 wrote...
Eradyn wrote...
Randy1083 wrote...
I'm not the biggest quarian supporter (I think they play the victim card a bit too much), but good on them for sticking it to the Council. Booting a species off of the Citadel and then still expecting them to follow the Citadel's laws is the height of arrogance and hypocrisy.
Considering what the quarians did to get kicked off the council in the first place...
I find it understandable why they aren't popular with their galactic neighbors and why many species would find this turn of events worrisome.
Well the quarians are not part of council space, so they dont have to uphold their laws or subject themselves to any kind of control from them. Others can be worried but they cant pretend to have any right to inspect their ships or have any control of what they do.
Quarian history and what you just said right there...would be part of the reason other species would have every right to be worried. The quarians have a history chock-full of pretty negative relations with the rest of galactic society...add on that layer of "we don't have to listen/do what you say, neener neener *waves big guns and beats war drums*" is not going to be a comforting situation. Loose cannons with loose cannons = galactic unease.
As I said they can worry but when it was the council choice to kick the quarians out, they can no longer expect to have any right to intervene in quarian matters. This includes the fleets right to arm themselves however they feel like.
They cant expect for the quarians to limit their fleet (given how it is their home), even more when it has been the council the one who has forced them to rely completely on the fleet by forbiding an even treathening orbital bombardment on any quarian attempt to settle on a planet, even those that are away from council space.
Modifié par Jog0907, 18 février 2012 - 02:25 .
#71
Posté 18 février 2012 - 02:44
Sir_Cabbage wrote...
oh please- all they need it for is to attack the geth and reclaim their homeworld. Thats hardly a reason to be scared.
Hmm... I wonder if that's why, despite destroying or re-integrating the heretics in ME2, it appeared in one of the trailers that the geth were working with the reapers. Maybe the quarians movement towards war to re-take their homeworld made the geth (whether re-unified or not) re-evaluate alliance with the reapers and they concluded that they needed to align themselves with the reapers after all.
#72
Posté 18 février 2012 - 02:48
Now they have upgraded to taking nuclear chits from the peaceful blue suns
#73
Posté 18 février 2012 - 02:59
#74
Posté 18 février 2012 - 03:03
" Dare I be so bold and suggest choices might have mattered ahh what the hell lets hope"
And just something ta think about there for the
"They tried to commit genocide. The rest of civilization has every right to interject itself in extreme cases like that." crowd.
Hell my shepard did it twice (near 3 for some of you) once on luna and once the citadel itself sure glad the council caught that and booted the humans out as well heheh. Thats if you would count a single unique AI killed to nip that Skynet crap in the bud as genocide.
Go Tali (I am biased and just speaken for myself of course)
#75
Posté 18 février 2012 - 03:15
If you seriously think the "Quarians" (as in the species) tried to shut down the geth, you are seriously overestimating how much unity a group of people have.





Retour en haut






