13 réponses à ce sujet

[mohdhm]

Pre-order cancled?

[FluffyScarf]

So bugs/flaws in Lagrim = funny, praise-worthy. Bugs in ME3 = tear the game down? One pathetic clown even said 'Close demo, play Lagrim instead' in the comments. Like that trash isn't full of hundreds of glitches.

[mohdhm]

FluffyScarf wrote...

So bugs/flaws in Lagrim = funny, praise-worthy. Bugs in ME3 = tear the game down? One pathetic clown even said 'Close demo, play Lagrim instead' in the comments. Like that trash isn't full of hundreds of glitches.

i dont know why you compare the fianl episode of the triliogy of ME, the most anticipated game of the year, to something i never heard of before.

[Radahldo]

Gayz

[FluffyScarf]

No demo represents the final quality of a game. You're comparing a demo to Lagrim, Dullrim, S@$!rim, whatever the hell that sequel to Oblivion is called, which is a finalised game that still has hundreds of bugs in it. See the double standards?

[Radahldo]

But he's not comparing the game to skyrim.

[yummysoap]

FluffyScarf wrote...

No demo represents the final quality of a game. You're comparing a demo to Lagrim, Dullrim, S@$!rim, whatever the hell that sequel to Oblivion is called, which is a finalised game that still has hundreds of bugs in it. See the double standards?

Nobody drew any comparison to Skyrim but you. I don't think I've seen a single post of yours that hasn't involved you ****ing about Skyrim. Go to the Bethesda forums if you want to complain. Please.

By the way, the portmanteau "lagrim" is one of the lamest I've ever seen. If you're going to insult something at least try to be clever about it.

[Moondoggie]

The point he was trying to get across is the double standards of some people who will ignore glitches in some games like Fallout and Skyrim but will point out every tiny glitch in another game even if there are far less of them than in games they constantly praise.

Honestly the stuff in the video is either a minor glitch much less worse than what was in full games like Skyrim or something that is not a glitch like the ducking down when you point your gun at a squadmate (they did the same in ME2) or it's just the person playing silly music over melee for some reason. Melee was in the other two games they just made it more interesting this time so i don't see what they are getting at.

The background graphics yeah if you look at them closely they are just simple 2D but what would be the point of them wasting memory just to render some graphics in the background that very few people will notice unless they look at every tiny detail just so they can come on the internet like "Worst game EVER!" while they get cheatos powder all over the keyboard.

And the husk in the doorway not actually being able to hurt you. Well yes it's the friggin tutorial! It'd be a bit pointless if they made the tutorial intro really really difficult wouldn't it.

Modifié par Moondoggie, 18 février 2012 - 12:24 .

[mohdhm]

Moondoggie wrote...

The point he was trying to get across is the double standards of some people who will ignore glitches in some games like Fallout and Skyrim but will point out every tiny glitch in another game even if there are far less of them than in games they constantly praise.

Honestly the stuff in the video is either a minor glitch much less worse than what was in full games like Skyrim or something that is not a glitch like the ducking down when you point your gun at a squadmate (they did the same in ME2) or it's just the person playing silly music over melee for some reason. Melee was in the other two games they just made it more interesting this time so i don't see what they are getting at.

The background graphics yeah if you look at them closely they are just simple 2D but what would be the point of them wasting memory just to render some graphics in the background that very few people will notice unless they look at every tiny detail just so they can come on the internet like "Worst game EVER!" while they get cheatos powder all over the keyboard.

And the husk in the doorway not actually being able to hurt you. Well yes it's the friggin tutorial! It'd be a bit pointless if they made the tutorial intro really really difficult wouldn't it.

Just another fanboy here, trying to justify why a game should be shipped out, incomplete. You are aware that animation is very important right? more so than the graphics and the story. It breaks all immersion when it is so ****ty like it is in ME3. It makes you laugh while earth is being destroyed because anderson is running like some sort of panzy that belongs in an insane asylum.

Some of us here remember EA rushing out command and conquer 4, the last game of the series... and look at how GREAT that turned out. During the demo, people like you were saying how "good" it was and how "we" are nitpicking and complaining. Turns out that cnc4 actually did turn into the "WORST GAME EVER." The game was so bad that it got a rating of 1/5 at amazon, and was garbage compared to cnc3 in graphics!!!

And comparing Skyrim to mass effect 3. I personally encountered very few bugs at the release date, for such a MASSIVE game. People like you fail to realize that there is no character depth at all in skyrim, it is basically an open world where you can do whatever you want. Hell you can ask a woman/man to marry you when you first meet them. So when there is a bug here and there, it does't feel like immersion has been broken.

We haven't heard word from bioware about the animations, so it is very safe to assume that this is what we are going to get in the release date. Damn Shame.

[AndersL]

mohdhm wrote...

Moondoggie wrote...

The point he was trying to get across is the double standards of some people who will ignore glitches in some games like Fallout and Skyrim but will point out every tiny glitch in another game even if there are far less of them than in games they constantly praise.

Honestly the stuff in the video is either a minor glitch much less worse than what was in full games like Skyrim or something that is not a glitch like the ducking down when you point your gun at a squadmate (they did the same in ME2) or it's just the person playing silly music over melee for some reason. Melee was in the other two games they just made it more interesting this time so i don't see what they are getting at.

The background graphics yeah if you look at them closely they are just simple 2D but what would be the point of them wasting memory just to render some graphics in the background that very few people will notice unless they look at every tiny detail just so they can come on the internet like "Worst game EVER!" while they get cheatos powder all over the keyboard.

And the husk in the doorway not actually being able to hurt you. Well yes it's the friggin tutorial! It'd be a bit pointless if they made the tutorial intro really really difficult wouldn't it.

Just another fanboy here, trying to justify why a game should be shipped out, incomplete. You are aware that animation is very important right? more so than the graphics and the story. It breaks all immersion when it is so ****ty like it is in ME3. It makes you laugh while earth is being destroyed because anderson is running like some sort of panzy that belongs in an insane asylum.

Some of us here remember EA rushing out command and conquer 4, the last game of the series... and look at how GREAT that turned out. During the demo, people like you were saying how "good" it was and how "we" are nitpicking and complaining. Turns out that cnc4 actually did turn into the "WORST GAME EVER." The game was so bad that it got a rating of 1/5 at amazon, and was garbage compared to cnc3 in graphics!!!

And comparing Skyrim to mass effect 3. I personally encountered very few bugs at the release date, for such a MASSIVE game. People like you fail to realize that there is no character depth at all in skyrim, it is basically an open world where you can do whatever you want. Hell you can ask a woman/man to marry you when you first meet them. So when there is a bug here and there, it does't feel like immersion has been broken.

We haven't heard word from bioware about the animations, so it is very safe to assume that this is what we are going to get in the release date. Damn Shame.

1+

[elferin91]

wow, just wow, i don't know about other but i think this had opposite effect on me, that music just made me want to play the game even more xD

[Goliz]

mohdhm wrote...

Moondoggie wrote...

The point he was trying to get across is the double standards of some people who will ignore glitches in some games like Fallout and Skyrim but will point out every tiny glitch in another game even if there are far less of them than in games they constantly praise.

Honestly the stuff in the video is either a minor glitch much less worse than what was in full games like Skyrim or something that is not a glitch like the ducking down when you point your gun at a squadmate (they did the same in ME2) or it's just the person playing silly music over melee for some reason. Melee was in the other two games they just made it more interesting this time so i don't see what they are getting at.

The background graphics yeah if you look at them closely they are just simple 2D but what would be the point of them wasting memory just to render some graphics in the background that very few people will notice unless they look at every tiny detail just so they can come on the internet like "Worst game EVER!" while they get cheatos powder all over the keyboard.

And the husk in the doorway not actually being able to hurt you. Well yes it's the friggin tutorial! It'd be a bit pointless if they made the tutorial intro really really difficult wouldn't it.

Just another fanboy here, trying to justify why a game should be shipped out, incomplete. You are aware that animation is very important right? more so than the graphics and the story. It breaks all immersion when it is so ****ty like it is in ME3. It makes you laugh while earth is being destroyed because anderson is running like some sort of panzy that belongs in an insane asylum.

Some of us here remember EA rushing out command and conquer 4, the last game of the series... and look at how GREAT that turned out. During the demo, people like you were saying how "good" it was and how "we" are nitpicking and complaining. Turns out that cnc4 actually did turn into the "WORST GAME EVER." The game was so bad that it got a rating of 1/5 at amazon, and was garbage compared to cnc3 in graphics!!!

And comparing Skyrim to mass effect 3. I personally encountered very few bugs at the release date, for such a MASSIVE game. People like you fail to realize that there is no character depth at all in skyrim, it is basically an open world where you can do whatever you want. Hell you can ask a woman/man to marry you when you first meet them. So when there is a bug here and there, it does't feel like immersion has been broken.

We haven't heard word from bioware about the animations, so it is very safe to assume that this is what we are going to get in the release date. Damn Shame.

Good point, my man. Good point.

Im a huge fanboy of Mass Effect, ME1 made me buy an Xbox 360. Yes, one game made me buy a freaking xbox. 

I've always looked past the series problems, because most of the time they werent problems, just people being picky. This time i cant do that, this time the game is ****ing ugly! How can you look at the video a feel good about it? How can you say its no problem?!

 BioWare, why are you doing this to us? Why?!   Im even buying the game through Origin.

[shunjalo]

mohdhm wrote...

Moondoggie wrote...

The point he was trying to get across is the double standards of some people who will ignore glitches in some games like Fallout and Skyrim but will point out every tiny glitch in another game even if there are far less of them than in games they constantly praise.

Honestly the stuff in the video is either a minor glitch much less worse than what was in full games like Skyrim or something that is not a glitch like the ducking down when you point your gun at a squadmate (they did the same in ME2) or it's just the person playing silly music over melee for some reason. Melee was in the other two games they just made it more interesting this time so i don't see what they are getting at.

The background graphics yeah if you look at them closely they are just simple 2D but what would be the point of them wasting memory just to render some graphics in the background that very few people will notice unless they look at every tiny detail just so they can come on the internet like "Worst game EVER!" while they get cheatos powder all over the keyboard.

And the husk in the doorway not actually being able to hurt you. Well yes it's the friggin tutorial! It'd be a bit pointless if they made the tutorial intro really really difficult wouldn't it.

Just another fanboy here, trying to justify why a game should be shipped out, incomplete. You are aware that animation is very important right? more so than the graphics and the story. It breaks all immersion when it is so ****ty like it is in ME3. It makes you laugh while earth is being destroyed because anderson is running like some sort of panzy that belongs in an insane asylum.

Some of us here remember EA rushing out command and conquer 4, the last game of the series... and look at how GREAT that turned out. During the demo, people like you were saying how "good" it was and how "we" are nitpicking and complaining. Turns out that cnc4 actually did turn into the "WORST GAME EVER." The game was so bad that it got a rating of 1/5 at amazon, and was garbage compared to cnc3 in graphics!!!

And comparing Skyrim to mass effect 3. I personally encountered very few bugs at the release date, for such a MASSIVE game. People like you fail to realize that there is no character depth at all in skyrim, it is basically an open world where you can do whatever you want. Hell you can ask a woman/man to marry you when you first meet them. So when there is a bug here and there, it does't feel like immersion has been broken.

We haven't heard word from bioware about the animations, so it is very safe to assume that this is what we are going to get in the release date. Damn Shame.

Couldn't have said this better myself. This game feels rushed, no doubt about it. They had the time to prepare tons of content (or so it seems), but not enough to get the most basic gameplay and technical aspects straight. Strange decisions, really, for a triple-a blockbuster. Unless they planned an extensive post-release patching. We'll see.

[jedierick]

One thing I noticed playing through the demo another time last night, when Shepard climbs up or down a ladder, his\\her weapon magically disappears, and then after your done with the ladder it magically appears in your hands. The animation for it is terrible, it actually looks like the character phases in and out of existence and then has a weapon.

Bring back holstering