What's FOV?
Seriously - Increase the FOV or add an option for it
Débuté par
SyyRaaaN
, févr. 18 2012 04:17
#126
Posté 06 mars 2012 - 02:34
#127
Posté 06 mars 2012 - 02:44
Field Of View
#128
Posté 06 mars 2012 - 02:54
sumoaltus wrote...
PC players like to demand a lot
Thats because we expect the game to be optimized for our platform, just like you expect it to be optimized for console.
#129
Posté 06 mars 2012 - 03:02
Mx_CN3 wrote...
That is an awful translation.Elios wrote...
piemanz wrote...
It's true. If games were made with the highest PC setting as standard then A: it would cost an absolute fortune to be a gamer, and B: The Devs would make a lot less money from even the PC market than they do now, simply because most people can't afford or simply don't want to be upgrading their rig every few months.
Back on topic:
I play on the PC and the FOV doesn't bother nearly as much in 3rd person games as it does in 1st person, but it wouldn't hurt to have the option.
translation QQ i cant run games on high all the time
deal with it the are a lot us that have no issue with price to have the best you dont have run your game on all high settings
for a long time i couldnt afford top end hardware i didnt **** about it
the fact we still see DX9 only games in 2012 is BS and its becouse we have been stuck in the longest running console generation ever
Fact: most people are unwilling or unable to invest more than a few hundred (read: around the price of an Xbox) into gaming, especially in this economy. Most people that are gamers are either on consoles, or buy their computers from a manufacturer (rather than a homemade rig). There may be a "lot of you" that have no issue with price, but you are vastly outnumbered by the people that do, they are also the people that usually don't go to internet forums and complain about the lack of graphical advancements.
Still wrong. You can make a good gaming rig for less than 800€ (monitor and peripherals included). Only thing you have to do is take care about what you are buying, and avoid
I've spent 615€ (including monitor and peripherals) on my PC two years ago (Nvidia GTS250 as video card, which I think is discontinued nowadays) and still is able to manage most of the games out there (didn't try BF3, because I'm not interested in the game). Ok, not all in highest settings, but still better looking than their console counterparts. And I'm very happy buying games for less than 5€ nearly always (usually I'm not hurry to play games on release).
You know why PCs are cheap? Because even if you have a console, you also buy a PC.
A "multitask" PC (gaming, working, internet, movies, music, etc...) is much cheaper than having a PC+Consoles+Blu-Ray+Hi-Fi system, etc...
Even having 2 PCs (Gaming+work+internet in one room, and a cheap and silent one for movies and music in the living room) is cheaper.
I understand why people like consoles (simplicity, nice to play in the living room with friends, not having to care about upgradings or drivers, etc...) but on the long run the price is not a real one. A console player spends as much as a PC player or more (hell, most PC games are released under 35€!!)
Modifié par Alex_SM, 06 mars 2012 - 03:09 .
#130
Posté 06 mars 2012 - 03:04
Was hoping some of the issues in the demo were because it was an old code.... hope now crushed for that one :-(
I have just started playing some ME Infiltrtor on iOS (iPad2), im gonna say it now:
Infiltrator has a better running animation than ME3 and uses better textures for than the suit from the first level of the demo.... on a cell phone game!!
I have just started playing some ME Infiltrtor on iOS (iPad2), im gonna say it now:
Infiltrator has a better running animation than ME3 and uses better textures for than the suit from the first level of the demo.... on a cell phone game!!
Modifié par apoc_reg, 06 mars 2012 - 03:05 .





Retour en haut






