themonty72 wrote...
You cant holster your weapon so it says but its 2011 and video games have came a long way and not having the option to holster just sound crazy.Which video games out today that dont offer the option of letting you put your weapons away.
LoL i was typing to fastBobSmith101 wrote...
themonty72 wrote...
You cant holster your weapon so it says but its 2011 and video games have came a long way and not having the option to holster just sound crazy.Which video games out today that dont offer the option of letting you put your weapons away.
It's actually 2012 , that must have been quite a party.
themonty72 wrote...
You cant holster your weapon so it says but its 2012 and video games have came a long way and not having the option to holster just sound crazy.Which video games out today that dont offer the option of letting you put your weapons away.
Modifié par Twizz089, 20 février 2012 - 09:22 .
Omg I cant say "black guy"? Wait what if I'm a "black guy"? OMG that was not P.C of me..GreatCake wrote...
Filth E Mcnasty wrote...
haha that is a picture of a black guy haha? :/ not a bad anything just think people should be given props when they do something good and I feel they did good.Random Jerkface wrote...
I am a real gamer
...What does the person being black have anything to do with the meme? Now you're just being racist.
Filth E Mcnasty wrote...
Omg I cant say "black guy"? Wait what if I'm a "black guy"? OMG that was not P.C of me..GreatCake wrote...
Filth E Mcnasty wrote...
haha that is a picture of a black guy haha? :/ not a bad anything just think people should be given props when they do something good and I feel they did good.Random Jerkface wrote...
I am a real gamer
...What does the person being black have anything to do with the meme? Now you're just being racist.
Twizz089 wrote...
themonty72 wrote...
You cant holster your weapon so it says but its 2012 and video games have came a long way and not having the option to holster just sound crazy.Which video games out today that dont offer the option of letting you put your weapons away.
Gears of War 3 and many other shooters. Why would one want to put their gun away in a combat zone? Now if I was walking around my ship or a city/space station with my gun out, then I think there would be a problem
Capeo wrote...
Twizz089 wrote...
themonty72 wrote...
You cant holster your weapon so it says but its 2012 and video games have came a long way and not having the option to holster just sound crazy.Which video games out today that dont offer the option of letting you put your weapons away.
Gears of War 3 and many other shooters. Why would one want to put their gun away in a combat zone? Now if I was walking around my ship or a city/space station with my gun out, then I think there would be a problem
In gears there's no exploring and no talking to NPCs like ME but even still you don't hold your gun up that ready while walking around. If you walk up to somebody else your not pointing your gun directly their face. Honestly I can't think of a single game where your gun is constantly shouldered no matter what you're doing. I find it really goofy and archaic looking.
Twizz089 wrote...
In ME3 when you talk to someone you enter a dialogue scene where the player lowers his weapon, so no when you walk up to somebody else and talk to them you arent pointing your gun directly in their face. However when you are in a combat zone your weapon should always be out. Unless you are suggesting that you want Bioware to dedicate a button to holstering your weapon just so that you can have your character holster his weapon while apporaching a npc, even though the cutscene will have you holster/lowering your weapon anyway. I think thats just plain silly and a waste of a button.
Modifié par Capeo, 21 février 2012 - 01:57 .
Capeo wrote...
Twizz089 wrote...
In ME3 when you talk to someone you enter a dialogue scene where the player lowers his weapon, so no when you walk up to somebody else and talk to them you arent pointing your gun directly in their face. However when you are in a combat zone your weapon should always be out. Unless you are suggesting that you want Bioware to dedicate a button to holstering your weapon just so that you can have your character holster his weapon while apporaching a npc, even though the cutscene will have you holster/lowering your weapon anyway. I think thats just plain silly and a waste of a button.
Dedicate a button? How about doing the same thing as 2 and every other game on the planet and just have it be holding the reload button. Think of doing the Normandy Crashsite with your gun out the entire time. It's moronic. Not to mention to slow and now the FOV always stays the same. And the combat zone excuse is utterly lame. You're not always supposed to know if you're in a combat zone. Your making an excuse for BW taking out a basic feature of every game that has even a modicum of exploring. Oh,and yes, I would like to able to initiate dialog with an NPC without first walking up to them with the barrel of my gun an inch from their face. It looks ridiculous.
Modifié par Twizz089, 21 février 2012 - 02:13 .
Twizz089 wrote...
Capeo wrote...
Twizz089 wrote...
In ME3 when you talk to someone you enter a dialogue scene where the player lowers his weapon, so no when you walk up to somebody else and talk to them you arent pointing your gun directly in their face. However when you are in a combat zone your weapon should always be out. Unless you are suggesting that you want Bioware to dedicate a button to holstering your weapon just so that you can have your character holster his weapon while apporaching a npc, even though the cutscene will have you holster/lowering your weapon anyway. I think thats just plain silly and a waste of a button.
Dedicate a button? How about doing the same thing as 2 and every other game on the planet and just have it be holding the reload button. Think of doing the Normandy Crashsite with your gun out the entire time. It's moronic. Not to mention to slow and now the FOV always stays the same. And the combat zone excuse is utterly lame. You're not always supposed to know if you're in a combat zone. Your making an excuse for BW taking out a basic feature of every game that has even a modicum of exploring. Oh,and yes, I would like to able to initiate dialog with an NPC without first walking up to them with the barrel of my gun an inch from their face. It looks ridiculous.
It seems like your complaining just because you can complain. The normandy crashsite could have just been handled like any other city/space station in which your guns would remain holstered. The demo only showed us combat zones and being such you shouldnt be holstering your weapon, even when you talk to npc on a combat zone you should always have your weapon out (just lower it, which is what happens in the dialogue scene.) And with this series and most shooter games it is fairly obvious when you are in a combat zone and when you are not, the abillity to holster and unholster your weapon wont change that fact.
Out of all the things to complain about in ME, the ability to put your weapon away when it should be out (since you are on a battlefield), has to be the one of the silliest things.
You could complain about animations, you could complain about class talents, you could complain about characters , you could complain about kinect, you could complain about multiplayer, but instead your complaint is "I want to be able to put my weapon away even though people around me are fighting and dying"
jedierick wrote...
Have to jump in here, you are my friend, in fact WRONG. The Normandy Crash Site DLC required you to shoot crates to get all of the tags. So, if this would have been ME3 DLC, you woudl have run around with your gun drawn, and not been able to appreciate the DLC for the cool look and feel it had.
Also, whats wrong with people wanting the holstering effect back? To tie in animation and holstering, have you seen the animation when Shepard climbs up ro down a ladder. The gun magically disappears when you start climbin, and reappears when your done. Had they left holstering in, this would not have been an eyesore. There are dozens of other missions in ME1 and ME2 that have the similar tone and layout. Taking it out was a bad idea, it is going backwards, not forwards. I could name a couple things to take out in the ME3 demo rather than holstering, what about the hack animation, why not keep the hacking game in, this way you dont have the "talk to the hand" animation that Shepard does when hacking a door now, they could put holstering back in.
There is nothign wrong with missing somethign and wanting it back. Were you here for the great uprising when they threatened to take away New Game + in ME2. yeah, and they ended up putting that back in.
Twizz089 wrote...
No I am quite right. What I said was If ME2 had no holstering effect then, the crash site would have to be handled and treated like a city or space station, that implies that there would not be destructible crates lying around.
Also no, having the holstering command would not change the fact that when you climb up a ladder the weapon disappears. Forcing a player to holster a gun before they climb a ladder, just to avoid an "eyesore" is forcing the player to come up with a bandaid fix to a problem. A reason for the return of the holster command should not be "to make up for poor animations", why make a holster command when they could just fix the animation?
How do you know that taking it out was a bad idea? Maybe the ME3 missions are less combat/exploration and more in your face combat, and maybe all the exploration is done in non combat zones, if this was the case and there is little to no down time from shooting then the holster command is not needed. There are plenty of shooter games where there is no holster command, why? because you are always shooting. With are without a holster command the cutscenes for the most part shows the character lowering their weapon anyway. Also I dont know of anybody who would explore an unknown combat zone during a battle with their weapon holstered.
You compare not having a holstering command to not having New Game + ,.... really?
Retour en haut
