Renegade Path Vs. Cerberus.
#1
Posté 20 février 2012 - 04:59
#2
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:01
#3
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:02
#4
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:03
#5
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:03
Taleroth wrote...
Because they're jerks.
This exactly this no other reason just this one
#6
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:04
Taleroth wrote...
Because they're jerks.
Those jerks!
#7
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:04
#8
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:06
"We got indoctrinated"
"We got greedy"
"we don't like you even though we spent 4,000,000,000 to bring you to life"
#9
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:06
Dave of Canada wrote...
Because it's easier to write one story with no deviation than one story with little deviation.
#10
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:09
#11
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:09
Taleroth wrote...
Because they're jerks.
See renegades? They're like you.
Modifié par BentOrgy, 20 février 2012 - 05:09 .
#12
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:18
Palathas wrote...
Yeah, this is going to hurt my CerberShep. They went pro Cerberus to the nth degree. I wonder how that'll pan out?
Same here, unfortunately.
#13
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:20
... TRANSMISSION TERMINATED ...
Yeah, they're just misunderstood.
Modifié par CommanderNuetral, 20 février 2012 - 05:20 .
#14
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:22
This.Dionkey wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
Because it's easier to write one story with no deviation than one story with little deviation.
#15
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:23
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
This.Dionkey wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
Because it's easier to write one story with no deviation than one story with little deviation.
Yep, it's simpler.
#16
Guest_D3MON-SOVER3IGN_*
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:24
Guest_D3MON-SOVER3IGN_*
Dave of Canada wrote...
Because it's easier to write one story with no deviation than one story with little deviation.
#17
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:24
Likely whatever he has in mind in ME3 is incompatible with stopping the Reapers
#18
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:25
EternalAmbiguity wrote...
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
This.Dionkey wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
Because it's easier to write one story with no deviation than one story with little deviation.
Yep, it's simpler.
Indeed.
#19
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:26
#20
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:29
Seboist wrote...
EternalAmbiguity wrote...
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
This.Dionkey wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
Because it's easier to write one story with no deviation than one story with little deviation.
Yep, it's simpler.
Indeed.
Yeah, who'd want to make a working game with dozens upon dozens of choices along with memorable characters and a fantastic story.
*cough* Alpha Protocol *cough*
#21
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:30
#22
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:31
Just good bussiness
#23
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:32
bobobo878 wrote...
According to Game Informer, tIM doesn't want Shepard to destroy the Reapers because he wants to take control of them for himself.
Is this true or just sheer speculation? Of all the theories that.... has to be the worst. Hope it isn't that or BW.... I am disappoint.
#24
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:35
What's wrong with that theory? Just imagine TIM surfing on the back of a Reaper sandworm style.Imbus1323 wrote...
bobobo878 wrote...
According to Game Informer, tIM doesn't want Shepard to destroy the Reapers because he wants to take control of them for himself.
Is this true or just sheer speculation? Of all the theories that.... has to be the worst. Hope it isn't that or BW.... I am disappoint.
That is how people ride around with Reapers, right? I think Saren did that.
#25
Posté 20 février 2012 - 05:35





Retour en haut







