Lucas-Shepard wrote...
On a related note, I have heard we're getting DLC so that you can play the game in first person - it will ofcourse apply to all installments in the franchise.
I read it somewhere about a year ago, I have absolutely no scources, but I vividly recall reading it over and over to be sure.
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Dunno why OP felt like continuing this. What you describe has never been said by any dev EVER. The entire concept is fairly close to impossible. The ME team was scrambling to finish ME3. They worked crazy hours during crunch. The idea that they would then spend thousands more hours recreating all the content for ME1 & ME2, is ridiculous.
And it cannot be restated enough, but this was NOT EVER discussed. You clearly misunderstood something that was said. No one else in this thread or the one last night is playing a trick on you. It just didn't happen.
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Dunno why OP felt like continuing this. What you describe has never been said by any dev EVER. The entire concept is fairly close to impossible. The ME team was scrambling to finish ME3. They worked crazy hours during crunch. The idea that they would then spend thousands more hours recreating all the content for ME1 & ME2, is ridiculous.
And it cannot be restated enough, but this was NOT EVER discussed. You clearly misunderstood something that was said. No one else in this thread or the one last night is playing a trick on you.
ziloe wrote...
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Dunno why OP felt like continuing this. What you describe has never been said by any dev EVER. The entire concept is fairly close to impossible. The ME team was scrambling to finish ME3. They worked crazy hours during crunch. The idea that they would then spend thousands more hours recreating all the content for ME1 & ME2, is ridiculous.
And it cannot be restated enough, but this was NOT EVER discussed. You clearly misunderstood something that was said. No one else in this thread or the one last night is playing a trick on you.
I continued it because no one understood what I was saying, because they were taking it so literally. Or, did you not read my very first statement? Geezus. Why are you asking a question that was clearly answered?
And again, it was a year ago. I've made it very clear that it obviously doesn't help that I don't have sources. But this is what I read, and it's stupid I'm getting attacked for it by people calling me mental, etc, for reading something and getting excited about it. And wanting to know if it was still being implemented.
Did it ever occur to any of you, that maybe they were going to do it? But it turned out not to be feesible, so they cut it? And just stopped promoting the idea?
ziloe wrote...
Did it ever occur to any of you, that maybe they were going to do it? But it turned out not to be feesible, so they cut it? And just stopped promoting the idea?
Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 20 février 2012 - 04:36 .
Modifié par tch2296, 20 février 2012 - 04:36 .
tch2296 wrote...
Where is this interview, Ziloe? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I think what you aren't understanding are the technical obstacles that would prevent Bioware from simply updating the graphics and totally changing the combat system of two enormous games released years ago on completely different engines.
Modifié par ziloe, 20 février 2012 - 04:41 .
When they did it for Lunar Star Story, it was about the same amount of work as creating a new game. So they had to sell it, they didn't just give it away for free.ziloe wrote...
tch2296 wrote...
Where is this interview, Ziloe? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I think what you aren't understanding are the technical obstacles that would prevent Bioware from simply updating the graphics and totally changing the combat system of two enormous games released years ago on completely different engines.
I don't see it being impossible at all. They would just need to improve textures and alter animations and combat mechanics. They've done this a dozen times for smaller games such as Lunar Star Story. So why not this too?
ziloe wrote...
tch2296 wrote...
Where is this interview, Ziloe? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I think what you aren't understanding are the technical obstacles that would prevent Bioware from simply updating the graphics and totally changing the combat system of two enormous games released years ago on completely different engines.
I don't see it being impossible at all. They would just need to improve textures and alter animations and combat mechanics. They've done this a dozen times for smaller games such as Lunar Star Story. So why not this too?
Taleroth wrote...
When they did it for Lunar Star Story, it was about the same amount of work as creating a new game. So they had to sell it, they didn't just give it away for free.ziloe wrote...
tch2296 wrote...
Where is this interview, Ziloe? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I think what you aren't understanding are the technical obstacles that would prevent Bioware from simply updating the graphics and totally changing the combat system of two enormous games released years ago on completely different engines.
I don't see it being impossible at all. They would just need to improve textures and alter animations and combat mechanics. They've done this a dozen times for smaller games such as Lunar Star Story. So why not this too?
ziloe wrote...
Taleroth wrote...
When they did it for Lunar Star Story, it was about the same amount of work as creating a new game. So they had to sell it, they didn't just give it away for free.ziloe wrote...
tch2296 wrote...
Where is this interview, Ziloe? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I think what you aren't understanding are the technical obstacles that would prevent Bioware from simply updating the graphics and totally changing the combat system of two enormous games released years ago on completely different engines.
I don't see it being impossible at all. They would just need to improve textures and alter animations and combat mechanics. They've done this a dozen times for smaller games such as Lunar Star Story. So why not this too?
And again, that's why I suggested it was maybe DLC, or that they scrapped it because it wasn't feasible.
Modifié par Candidate 88766, 20 février 2012 - 04:46 .
Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 20 février 2012 - 04:45 .
mgoss wrote...
I believe you just have selective reading. Nobody really insulting you. Just stating that you're incorrect and this wouldn't be feasible.
ziloe wrote...
mgoss wrote...
I believe you just have selective reading. Nobody really insulting you. Just stating that you're incorrect and this wouldn't be feasible.
Uhh, read the comments. People are calling me mental, etc. I'm trying to be quite civil, and even if I'm wrong, not once has anyone at least admitted that they'd actually like the idea, despite the costs.
ziloe wrote...
mgoss wrote...
I believe you just have selective reading. Nobody really insulting you. Just stating that you're incorrect and this wouldn't be feasible.
Uhh, read the comments. People are calling me mental, etc. I'm trying to be quite civil, and even if I'm wrong, not once has anyone at least admitted that they'd actually like the idea, despite the costs.
Candidate 88766 wrote...
There's no need to insult the OP over this. Its just not necessary.
OP: you're remembering something that you misinterpreted a year ago. Bioware would never have said this because its immediately apparent that it simply isn't feasible without 4 to 5 discs. Its not something they would have considered, spoken about and then realised was virtually impossible - they'd have realised almost instantly that its almost impossible to do. They would never have mentioned it to any interviewer as something like this would never leave the room it was brought up in. Also, even if this were a consideration, they wouldn't make people play through ME3 to be able to access updated versions of the previous games.
It seems that you misread an article from a year ago, and are now misinterpreting your memory of what you misread. This isn't something Bioware has ever spoken about, and it isn't something that Bioware would ever speak about - if it ever was an idea, it would've been apparent within minutes that it wasn't feasible. It would never have been considered long enough to have been brought up in an interview. Besides, someone else would've read it as well. There was no mention of anything like this a year ago, and there hasn't been since.
I'm not sure why some people here felt the need to insult you, but you are mistaken.
IMO its too early to consider re-makes anyway. Frankly, unless its at least 10 years old, it doesn't need remaking. There would be no point remaking/updating a game that came out 2 years ago.
Gongon11 wrote...
ziloe wrote...
mgoss wrote...
I believe you just have selective reading. Nobody really insulting you. Just stating that you're incorrect and this wouldn't be feasible.
Uhh, read the comments. People are calling me mental, etc. I'm trying to be quite civil, and even if I'm wrong, not once has anyone at least admitted that they'd actually like the idea, despite the costs.
no ones actually called you mental though? all we are doing is telling you that you are wrong, nothing more nothing less
Exia001 wrote...
ziloe wrote...
Gongon11 wrote...
ziloe wrote...
Candidate 88766 wrote...
The OP is not trolling.
He is, however, wrong. Bioware never stated this. OP, you obviously misinterpreted something Bioware said - they have never even hinted at the idea of a new game+ mode that includes all three games remastered.
Thank you.
However, as I said, this was a year ago, and I remember being quite excited at the idea. I do remember reading it over too, just to make sure I wasn't wrong. Obviously it doesn't help my case that I don't have the source, but I tried to avoid the forums as much as I could. I spoilt DA2 too much for myself, which is why I've only come back here recently, and only to clarify a few points I was curious about, since I haven't played in some time. At any rate, this is what I remember them saying. Maybe it didn't go viral enough, but I remember it being said.
if they really did say what your saying it would have blown up, like we have all said before, you have just misunderstood, there is no way they can have all three games on one dvd
It's not one DVD though. It's two. And again, are you guys seriously going to cut down an idea, all because you don't think it can be done? Where are the people who, even though hesitant, LIKE the idea? I mean, c'mon!
Would be nice to hear from a Dev at this point.
What do you mean 'Its not one its two' the entire ME trilogy would take up 5 disks....5!
You probably wont hear from a dev as you are being mental
ziloe wrote...
Candidate 88766 wrote...
There's no need to insult the OP over this. Its just not necessary.
OP: you're remembering something that you misinterpreted a year ago. Bioware would never have said this because its immediately apparent that it simply isn't feasible without 4 to 5 discs. Its not something they would have considered, spoken about and then realised was virtually impossible - they'd have realised almost instantly that its almost impossible to do. They would never have mentioned it to any interviewer as something like this would never leave the room it was brought up in. Also, even if this were a consideration, they wouldn't make people play through ME3 to be able to access updated versions of the previous games.
It seems that you misread an article from a year ago, and are now misinterpreting your memory of what you misread. This isn't something Bioware has ever spoken about, and it isn't something that Bioware would ever speak about - if it ever was an idea, it would've been apparent within minutes that it wasn't feasible. It would never have been considered long enough to have been brought up in an interview. Besides, someone else would've read it as well. There was no mention of anything like this a year ago, and there hasn't been since.
I'm not sure why some people here felt the need to insult you, but you are mistaken.
IMO its too early to consider re-makes anyway. Frankly, unless its at least 10 years old, it doesn't need remaking. There would be no point remaking/updating a game that came out 2 years ago.
As I said, when I read it way back, I was excited about it. It's one reason I didn't replay my game, because I thought, hey, I can wait it out and play renegade for the New Game Plus. Nevertheless, I get what you're saying, but I do remember reading this. Maybe it was from a smaller interviewing site, and that's why it didn't get much hubbub. And who's to say the actual interviewer didn't misinterpret it?
Despite that, it's just unfortunate that people here can't even admit that they'd like the idea. We have all played a series, I think, and thought to ourselves that it would be nice to replay the older games with the new features, no? Am I wrong?
<_<
ziloe wrote...
Gongon11 wrote...
ziloe wrote...
mgoss wrote...
I believe you just have selective reading. Nobody really insulting you. Just stating that you're incorrect and this wouldn't be feasible.
Uhh, read the comments. People are calling me mental, etc. I'm trying to be quite civil, and even if I'm wrong, not once has anyone at least admitted that they'd actually like the idea, despite the costs.
no ones actually called you mental though? all we are doing is telling you that you are wrong, nothing more nothing less
What do you call this?Exia001 wrote...
ziloe wrote...
Gongon11 wrote...
ziloe wrote...
Candidate 88766 wrote...
The OP is not trolling.
He is, however, wrong. Bioware never stated this. OP, you obviously misinterpreted something Bioware said - they have never even hinted at the idea of a new game+ mode that includes all three games remastered.
Thank you.
However, as I said, this was a year ago, and I remember being quite excited at the idea. I do remember reading it over too, just to make sure I wasn't wrong. Obviously it doesn't help my case that I don't have the source, but I tried to avoid the forums as much as I could. I spoilt DA2 too much for myself, which is why I've only come back here recently, and only to clarify a few points I was curious about, since I haven't played in some time. At any rate, this is what I remember them saying. Maybe it didn't go viral enough, but I remember it being said.
if they really did say what your saying it would have blown up, like we have all said before, you have just misunderstood, there is no way they can have all three games on one dvd
It's not one DVD though. It's two. And again, are you guys seriously going to cut down an idea, all because you don't think it can be done? Where are the people who, even though hesitant, LIKE the idea? I mean, c'mon!
Would be nice to hear from a Dev at this point.
What do you mean 'Its not one its two' the entire ME trilogy would take up 5 disks....5!
You probably wont hear from a dev as you are being mental
Either you're wrong or the interviewer was wrong. Although chances are that if this was mentioned in an article someone would've picked up on it - BSN overanalyses everything ME related.ziloe wrote...
Candidate 88766 wrote...
There's no need to insult the OP over this. Its just not necessary.
OP: you're remembering something that you misinterpreted a year ago. Bioware would never have said this because its immediately apparent that it simply isn't feasible without 4 to 5 discs. Its not something they would have considered, spoken about and then realised was virtually impossible - they'd have realised almost instantly that its almost impossible to do. They would never have mentioned it to any interviewer as something like this would never leave the room it was brought up in. Also, even if this were a consideration, they wouldn't make people play through ME3 to be able to access updated versions of the previous games.
It seems that you misread an article from a year ago, and are now misinterpreting your memory of what you misread. This isn't something Bioware has ever spoken about, and it isn't something that Bioware would ever speak about - if it ever was an idea, it would've been apparent within minutes that it wasn't feasible. It would never have been considered long enough to have been brought up in an interview. Besides, someone else would've read it as well. There was no mention of anything like this a year ago, and there hasn't been since.
I'm not sure why some people here felt the need to insult you, but you are mistaken.
IMO its too early to consider re-makes anyway. Frankly, unless its at least 10 years old, it doesn't need remaking. There would be no point remaking/updating a game that came out 2 years ago.
As I said, when I read it way back, I was excited about it. It's one reason I didn't replay my game, because I thought, hey, I can wait it out and play renegade for the New Game Plus. Nevertheless, I get what you're saying, but I do remember reading this. Maybe it was from a smaller interviewing site, and that's why it didn't get much hubbub. And who's to say the actual interviewer didn't misinterpret it?
Despite that, it's just unfortunate that people here can't even admit that they'd like the idea. We have all played a series, I think, and thought to ourselves that it would be nice to replay the older games with the new features, no? Am I wrong?
Retour en haut