205 réponses à ce sujet

[ziloe]

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.

Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it. 

How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.

[littlezack]

ziloe wrote...

Gongon11 wrote...

Legion64 wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

Yep. There is no way to discuss this rationally when OP continues to maintain a fiction.

Are you blind? Have you not read a single of the latest things I've stated. All I said at this point was that it was ridiculous how people can't even admit that it's a cool idea, despite the costs. 

And yet, here I am being attacked, all because you people can't read!

YOU people?! What do you mean by you people?!?

Now hes just being racist...sigh

No, you're wrong, you say. We all know Bioware has made promises that didn't end up happening, so who's to say they didn't boast too far?  

Here's the thing, though - what you're saying? It'd be like if Bioware promised that Mass Effect 3 would cook my breakfast and file my taxes. If they actually said that, I think it would have raised a lot of eyebrows, because, well...that's a lot to buy.

[izmirtheastarach]

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.

Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it. 

How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.

I'm not telling you you didn't read it. I'm telling you BIOWARE didn't say it. Whatever you read was not written by them.

Also, to what you just said, if you saw it on google news, you can find it again. Using google. Why don't you take some time and work on that, and then you can come back to the table with proof?

Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 20 février 2012 - 05:34 .

[ziloe]

danabe wrote...

Seriously, you are just spinning in the dirt here.... What do you want people to say? "Oh, yes that might be right! you have plenty of proof to hold that up becuse i happen to enjoy looking for intervies articles among other things that actually give some information about the game. But you clearly have read it somewhere and noone else took notice! You -might- just be right there bud!" Yeah...

No... I clearly stated that it would have been nice to hear from others that even though it wasn't happening, that it would be a cool idea. Did you ever consider Bioware looking over this thread and wondering if people would ever buy into the idea? Instead, all you guys ever did was attack the OP for being wrong and not having sources, while not discussing the subject itself at all, or if you'd even like the idea. Costs were besides the point.

[Legion64]

Fine. That would be fun but it will never happen. Now that I have stated what I think about it, I must wrong you for not having sources. LIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!

[ziloe]

izmirtheastarach wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.

Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it.


How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.

I'm not telling you you didn't read it. I'm telling you BIOWARE didn't say it. Whatever you read was not written by them.

Also, to what you just said, if you saw it on google news, you can find it again. Using google. Why don't you take some time and work on that, and then you can come back to the table with proof?

Google news from a year ago? That's quite the lot to go through, lol. Obviously the author was wrong, we both agree, and it's unfortunate. But watch, even if I agree to this, it will be irrelevant a couple posts from now, with people saying I can't accept it, even though I have.  And I did sometime ago too, suggesting this before, but people still said the same thing, even yourself. 

[chengthao]

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.

Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it. 

How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.

and thats why ppl think your crazy, b/c clearly it did not happen, if you can't prove it why should ppl believe you . . . to "shut up" your critics, just go back to where you read the "article" and post a link

the definiton of insane is to do the same thing over and over again and expect a different outcome

[izmirtheastarach]

ziloe wrote...

Google news from a year ago? That's quite the lot to go through, lol. Obviously the author was wrong, we both agree, and it's unfortunate. But watch, even if I agree to this, it will be irrelevant a couple posts from now, with people saying I can't accept it, even though I have.  And I did sometime ago too, suggesting this before, but people still said the same thing, even yourself. 

There is nowhere the thread can go at this point. She's dead, my friend. Time to give up.

[ziloe]

Legion64 wrote...

Fine. That would be fun but it will never happen. Now that I have stated what I think about it, I must wrong you for not having sources. LIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!

I always knew you were a flipflopper Miranda. First you like Legion, and then you like Miranda. You're going to betray us all! And you call me the liar, you said you loved me! 

Well, I'm sleeping with Tali now, take that! 

[ziloe]

chengthao wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.

Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it. 

How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.

and thats why ppl think your crazy, b/c clearly it did not happen, if you can't prove it why should ppl believe you . . . to "shut up" your critics, just go back to where you read the "article" and post a link

the definiton of insane is to do the same thing over and over again and expect a different outcome

I know the definition. I wasn't repeating myself. If you bothered not to skim my posts, you'd see that. I was also talking about how it would have been nice to hear people talking about the idea itself, and not just outright how wrong it was. This is a discussion forum, not a place to tell people how wrong they are and just shut them down. 

[danabe]

ziloe wrote...

No... I clearly stated that it would have been nice to hear from others that even though it wasn't happening, that it would be a cool idea. Did you ever consider Bioware looking over this thread and wondering if people would ever buy into the idea? Instead, all you guys ever did was attack the OP for being wrong and not having sources, while not discussing the subject itself at all, or if you'd even like the idea. Costs were besides the point.

Sure i like the idea, would be neat if they could do it no doubt about that matter. But this wasen't what you asked or stated before. Therefore people reacted like they did.

But come on, how did people attack you? (Aside from that guy that called you mental) By telling you that you where wrong about that it would happen? Or that it was wrong about whoever posting that article or whatever you read/saw that they where wrong?

[littlezack]

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.

Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it.


How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.

I'm not telling you you didn't read it. I'm telling you BIOWARE didn't say it. Whatever you read was not written by them.

Also, to what you just said, if you saw it on google news, you can find it again. Using google. Why don't you take some time and work on that, and then you can come back to the table with proof?

Google news from a year ago? That's quite the lot to go through, lol.

Not really. If you even remember one sentence from the  article - which, since you seem insistent that it's a vivid memory to you, you should be able to do - type it into a search engine surrounded by italics and it'll search and find an exact phrase with the words in that order.

[chengthao]

ziloe wrote...

chengthao wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.

Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it. 

How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.

and thats why ppl think your crazy, b/c clearly it did not happen, if you can't prove it why should ppl believe you . . . to "shut up" your critics, just go back to where you read the "article" and post a link

the definiton of insane is to do the same thing over and over again and expect a different outcome

I know the definition. I wasn't repeating myself. If you bothered not to skim my posts, you'd see that. I was also talking about how it would have been nice to hear people talking about the idea itself, and not just outright how wrong it was. This is a discussion forum, not a place to tell people how wrong they are and just shut them down. 

i believe i quoted you

i believe you've been trying to defend your position that "you saw what you saw"

[ziloe]

chengthao wrote...

ziloe wrote...

chengthao wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.

Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it. 

How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.

and thats why ppl think your crazy, b/c clearly it did not happen, if you can't prove it why should ppl believe you . . . to "shut up" your critics, just go back to where you read the "article" and post a link

the definiton of insane is to do the same thing over and over again and expect a different outcome

I know the definition. I wasn't repeating myself. If you bothered not to skim my posts, you'd see that. I was also talking about how it would have been nice to hear people talking about the idea itself, and not just outright how wrong it was. This is a discussion forum, not a place to tell people how wrong they are and just shut them down. 

i believe i quoted you

i believe you've been trying to defend your position that "you saw what you saw"

Way to dismiss everything else I said. 

[ziloe]

littlezack wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.

Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it.


How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.

I'm not telling you you didn't read it. I'm telling you BIOWARE didn't say it. Whatever you read was not written by them.

Also, to what you just said, if you saw it on google news, you can find it again. Using google. Why don't you take some time and work on that, and then you can come back to the table with proof?

Google news from a year ago? That's quite the lot to go through, lol.

Not really. If you even remember one sentence from the  article - which, since you seem insistent that it's a vivid memory to you, you should be able to do - type it into a search engine surrounded by italics and it'll search and find an exact phrase with the words in that order.

Being excited is the vivid part. Not the article's link itself. Just remembering how I was glad I didn't have to replay the older games, because the new one was going to have all of it, or so it said. 

[chengthao]

ziloe wrote...

chengthao wrote...

i believe i quoted you

i believe you've been trying to defend your position that "you saw what you saw"

Way to dismiss everything else I said. 

i didn't "dismiss" everything else, i just pointed out that most of your posts are about you "seeing what you saw"

insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome

you're trying to "defend" yourself and what you saw w/o any kind of proof and you keep expecting ppl to suddenly believe you b/c you "saw what you saw"

[ziloe]

danabe wrote...

ziloe wrote...

No... I clearly stated that it would have been nice to hear from others that even though it wasn't happening, that it would be a cool idea. Did you ever consider Bioware looking over this thread and wondering if people would ever buy into the idea? Instead, all you guys ever did was attack the OP for being wrong and not having sources, while not discussing the subject itself at all, or if you'd even like the idea. Costs were besides the point.

Sure i like the idea, would be neat if they could do it no doubt about that matter. But this wasen't what you asked or stated before. Therefore people reacted like they did.

But come on, how did people attack you? (Aside from that guy that called you mental) By telling you that you where wrong about that it would happen? Or that it was wrong about whoever posting that article or whatever you read/saw that they where wrong?

People telling me how I'm wrong, and how I'm delusional, and how the article never happened, is essentially attacking me. Who's to say the article didn't happen? What if it did and it was still wrong? Would that make any difference now? No. People would still say, well it's wrong. Obviously it is. But to say that I'm outright wrong for believing something I read, and because I didn't frequent the forums enough to know it was false, that's kind of silly. 

[Gongon11]

The white room is that way my friend

[littlezack]

ziloe wrote...

littlezack wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.

Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it.


How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.

I'm not telling you you didn't read it. I'm telling you BIOWARE didn't say it. Whatever you read was not written by them.

Also, to what you just said, if you saw it on google news, you can find it again. Using google. Why don't you take some time and work on that, and then you can come back to the table with proof?

Google news from a year ago? That's quite the lot to go through, lol.

Not really. If you even remember one sentence from the  article - which, since you seem insistent that it's a vivid memory to you, you should be able to do - type it into a search engine surrounded by italics and it'll search and find an exact phrase with the words in that order.

Being excited is the vivid part. Not the article's link itself. Just remembering how I was glad I didn't have to replay the older games, because the new one was going to have all of it, or so it said. 

How...suspiciously convenient for you.

[izmirtheastarach]

We are all to say the article didn't happen, unless you produce the article. If you had taken the time you've spent arguing with people to no purpose here, and used it to search for the article, I'm sure you would have found it by now.

[chengthao]

ziloe wrote...
People telling me how I'm wrong, and how I'm delusional, and how the article never happened, is essentially attacking me. Who's to say the article didn't happen? What if it did and it was still wrong? Would that make any difference now? No. People would still say, well it's wrong. Obviously it is. But to say that I'm outright wrong for believing something I read, and because I didn't frequent the forums enough to know it was false, that's kind of silly. 

its not the fact that the article is "wrong", its the fact that you insist that the article exists but don't post links to it to validate your claim

[ziloe]

chengthao wrote...

ziloe wrote...

chengthao wrote...

i believe i quoted you

i believe you've been trying to defend your position that "you saw what you saw"

Way to dismiss everything else I said. 

i didn't "dismiss" everything else, i just pointed out that most of your posts are about you "seeing what you saw"

insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome

you're trying to "defend" yourself and what you saw w/o any kind of proof and you keep expecting ppl to suddenly believe you b/c you "saw what you saw"

No one is expecting you to believe anything and everything I say as fact! I am simply expecting you to understand and accept that I read something that said this. Whether it is wrong or not, is besides the point. Telling me I'm crazy because I read an article that was wrong, is really ****ed up. 

[crazyrabbits]

http://www.computera...3-has-new-game/

Someone already posted this on the second page. The whole NG+ is intended to be an amalgam of the "plus" modes from the first and second game. Supposedly, it allows you to play post-campaign (likely for DLC), but it also allows you to go back and finish what is apparently new content in the NG+.

What's all this about shoving 3 complete games on the same disc? Was there a sudden jump in technology I didn't find out about?

Modifié par crazyrabbits, 20 février 2012 - 05:54 .

[izmirtheastarach]

crazyrabbits wrote...

http://www.computera...3-has-new-game/

Someone already posted this on the second page. The whole NG+ is intended to be an amalgam of the "plus" modes from the first and second game. Supposedly, it allows you to play post-campaign (likely for DLC), but it also allows you to go back and finish what is apparently new content in the NG+.

What's all this about shoving 2 complete games on the same disc? Was there a sudden jump in technology I didn't find out about?

This sounds like it could be what the OP read and misunderstood.

Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 20 février 2012 - 05:54 .

[ziloe]

littlezack wrote...

ziloe wrote...

littlezack wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.

Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it.


How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.

I'm not telling you you didn't read it. I'm telling you BIOWARE didn't say it. Whatever you read was not written by them.

Also, to what you just said, if you saw it on google news, you can find it again. Using google. Why don't you take some time and work on that, and then you can come back to the table with proof?

Google news from a year ago? That's quite the lot to go through, lol.

Not really. If you even remember one sentence from the  article - which, since you seem insistent that it's a vivid memory to you, you should be able to do - type it into a search engine surrounded by italics and it'll search and find an exact phrase with the words in that order.

Being excited is the vivid part. Not the article's link itself. Just remembering how I was glad I didn't have to replay the older games, because the new one was going to have all of it, or so it said. 

How...suspiciously convenient for you.

See? I totally forgot paranoid, too. Gawd. I can't even say something without people being like, OH MY GAWD HE MUST HAVE A DOUBLE MEANING, TROLLOLOLOL