Aller au contenu

Photo

Mass Effect 3 New Game +


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
205 réponses à ce sujet

#126
Guest_Imperium Alpha_*

Guest_Imperium Alpha_*
  • Guests
 Image IPB
OP you are just stupid. BioWare never said such thing. Most they can have said is that once you finished ME3 you can go back to ME1/ME2 and make other playthrough. Stop checking unreliable gaming news site.

#127
littlezack

littlezack
  • Members
  • 1 532 messages

ziloe wrote...

littlezack wrote...

ziloe wrote...

littlezack wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

I have no control over others, but my only purpose was to explain that this wasn't a feature that was ever discussed by Bioware. It was not my intent to start an argument about it. Perhaps we can all just move on now.


Yeah, but here's the thing. You're telling me it never happened. I read it. I did not misread it.


How many of you when you wanted to know something about a game, would just google the name and click the news section? That's what I do, and maybe it came up with an unreliable source. So, to outright tell me it didn't happen, when I clearly remember seeing it and being excited, that itself is kind of silly. Is it impossible to accept that I saw what I saw, and that it happened, but maybe the author was wrong? Sheesh.


I'm not telling you you didn't read it. I'm telling you BIOWARE didn't say it. Whatever you read was not written by them.

Also, to what you just said, if you saw it on google news, you can find it again. Using google. Why don't you take some time and work on that, and then you can come back to the table with proof?


Google news from a year ago? That's quite the lot to go through, lol.


Not really. If you even remember one sentence from the  article - which, since you seem insistent that it's a vivid memory to you, you should be able to do - type it into a search engine surrounded by italics and it'll search and find an exact phrase with the words in that order.


Being excited is the vivid part. Not the article's link itself. Just remembering how I was glad I didn't have to replay the older games, because the new one was going to have all of it, or so it said. 


How...suspiciously convenient for you.


See? I totally forgot paranoid, too. Gawd. I can't even say something without people being like, OH MY GAWD HE MUST HAVE A DOUBLE MEANING, TROLLOLOLOL


I don't know you from Adam and you seem like a rather annoying person to boot. I have no reason to think the best out of you, so...

#128
chengthao

chengthao
  • Members
  • 1 223 messages

ziloe wrote...

chengthao wrote...

ziloe wrote...

chengthao wrote...

i believe i quoted you

i believe you've been trying to defend your position that "you saw what you saw"


Way to dismiss everything else I said. 


i didn't "dismiss" everything else, i just pointed out that most of your posts are about you "seeing what you saw"

insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome

you're trying to "defend" yourself and what you saw w/o any kind of proof and you keep expecting ppl to suddenly believe you b/c you "saw what you saw"


No one is expecting you to believe anything and everything I say as fact! I am simply expecting you to understand and accept that I read something that said this. Whether it is wrong or not, is besides the point. Telling me I'm crazy because I read an article that was wrong, is really ****ed up. 


its not that you read an article that was wrong, its that you read an article but don't post a link to it to validate your claim and you keep trying to defend that you "read what you read"

just admit that maybe you read it wrong, or that maybe you were "so excited" and mis-read, or just post a link to the article that you read

defending that you "read what you read" and expect ppl to simply believe you solely based on your word w/o any proof is just insane

#129
ziloe

ziloe
  • Members
  • 3 088 messages

crazyrabbits wrote...

http://www.computera...3-has-new-game/

Someone already posted this on the second page. The whole NG+ is intended to be an amalgam of the "plus" modes from the first and second game. Supposedly, it allows you to play post-campaign (likely for DLC), but it also allows you to go back and finish what is apparently new content in the NG+.

What's all this about shoving 3 complete games on the same disc? Was there a sudden jump in technology I didn't find out about?


it wouldn't be the same disc. I didn't even know it was only 2 discs until today. I wouldn't have cared if it was 4. Why would it have mattered? It would just mean more awesomeness, no? 

And yes, I think this was it. However, it states "campaign", and I consider a campaign to be the whole thing, as is what you'd call a series of adventures within a set campaign in, say, D&D. 

#130
izmirtheastarach

izmirtheastarach
  • Members
  • 5 298 messages

ziloe wrote...

crazyrabbits wrote...

http://www.computera...3-has-new-game/

Someone already posted this on the second page. The whole NG+ is intended to be an amalgam of the "plus" modes from the first and second game. Supposedly, it allows you to play post-campaign (likely for DLC), but it also allows you to go back and finish what is apparently new content in the NG+.

What's all this about shoving 3 complete games on the same disc? Was there a sudden jump in technology I didn't find out about?


it wouldn't be the same disc. I didn't even know it was only 2 discs until today. I wouldn't have cared if it was 4. Why would it have mattered? It would just mean more awesomeness, no? 

And yes, I think this was it. However, it states "campaign", and I consider a campaign to be the whole thing, as is what you'd call a series of adventures within a set campaign in, say, D&D. 


All that it means is that after you beat the main quest in ME3, you will be allowed to continue playing the game. Understand? This was a feature of ME2, but not ME1. So ME3 will have this feature, but also an NG+ system similar to ME1.

Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 20 février 2012 - 06:02 .


#131
Lucas-Shepard

Lucas-Shepard
  • Members
  • 113 messages
Image IPB

Dude, you make being stubborn into an art. Why don't you just call it quits and move on?

#132
Luan

Luan
  • Members
  • 403 messages
Alright I think we've had enough, it's a wonder Chris hasn't closed the thread yet.

#133
izmirtheastarach

izmirtheastarach
  • Members
  • 5 298 messages

Luan wrote...

Alright I think we've had enough, it's a wonder Chris hasn't closed the thread yet.


Today is family day in Canada. Maybe he's trying to spend time with his.

#134
danabe

danabe
  • Members
  • 323 messages
I would just like to take the opportunity to say that... I do indeed like carrot cake... I read that evryone likes carrot cake. If you say i am wrong about this you are attacking me! Becuse i read it!

#135
ziloe

ziloe
  • Members
  • 3 088 messages

Lucas-Shepard wrote...

Image IPB

Dude, you make being stubborn into an art. Why don't you just call it quits and move on?


See? Told you it wouldn't stop, even if I admitted to misunderstanding. However, even then, the last thread didn't understand the concept of "whole" story to be referring to more than one game, so excuse me for mistaking "campaign" to mean the embodiment of the whole trilogy. =/

#136
littlezack

littlezack
  • Members
  • 1 532 messages
You know, if you're really feeling that abused in your own thread, you could just...leave.

#137
chengthao

chengthao
  • Members
  • 1 223 messages

danabe wrote...

I would just like to take the opportunity to say that... I do indeed like carrot cake... I read that evryone likes carrot cake. If you say i am wrong about this you are attacking me! Becuse i read it!


i like cheese cake, now you've read that too

#138
izmirtheastarach

izmirtheastarach
  • Members
  • 5 298 messages
Three hours spent arguing something that would have been cleared up immediately if you had simply reread the article.

Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 20 février 2012 - 06:05 .


#139
danabe

danabe
  • Members
  • 323 messages

chengthao wrote...

danabe wrote...

I would just like to take the opportunity to say that... I do indeed like carrot cake... I read that evryone likes carrot cake. If you say i am wrong about this you are attacking me! Becuse i read it!


i like cheese cake, now you've read that too


Hm yes, then it's true! And if anyone claims that you do not then you are attacked! Attacked i tell you! :o

#140
El Mito

El Mito
  • Members
  • 166 messages
This just might be the dumbest OP I've ever seen.

#141
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 789 messages
what the OP said is not happening....

yet

if Bioware published a Mass Effect trilogy with updated graphics and ME3 gameplay for the whole run I would legit drop happily 150 dolnlars on it no question asked

#142
ziloe

ziloe
  • Members
  • 3 088 messages

izmirtheastarach wrote...

Three hours spent arguing something that would have been cleared up immediately if you had simply reread the article.


Three hours spent arguing, when it could have been, "Hey, that sounds like a cool idea. I haven't heard anything on it, can you provide the source?"
"Sorry, it's been sometime since I saw the article."
"Bummer. Still, if you can find it, I'd love to see it because <insert why you love idea here/>."
<Discussion begins on pros and cons/>

Instead, it went something like this: "Sources!"
"Sorry, it's been sometime since I saw the article."
"YOU'RE A LIAR AND A TROLL!"
<Begin argument.>

#143
Lucas-Shepard

Lucas-Shepard
  • Members
  • 113 messages

ziloe wrote...


See? Told you it wouldn't stop, even if I admitted to misunderstanding. However, even then, the last thread didn't understand the concept of "whole" story to be referring to more than one game, so excuse me for mistaking "campaign" to mean the embodiment of the whole trilogy. =/


First of all, getting all emo and feeling victimized won't work.

Second of all, there was a one minute between my post and you finally admitting you were wrong. This thread would never have been if you had not posted a thread claiming a memory from a year ago to be the truth.

It's good for you that you finally did though. It's all about the small steps I guess.

Modifié par Lucas-Shepard, 20 février 2012 - 06:10 .


#144
izmirtheastarach

izmirtheastarach
  • Members
  • 5 298 messages

ziloe wrote...

izmirtheastarach wrote...

Three hours spent arguing something that would have been cleared up immediately if you had simply reread the article.


Three hours spent arguing, when it could have been, "Hey, that sounds like a cool idea. I haven't heard anything on it, can you provide the source?"
"Sorry, it's been sometime since I saw the article."
"Bummer. Still, if you can find it, I'd love to see it because <insert why you love idea here/>."
<Discussion begins on pros and cons/>

Instead, it went something like this: "Sources!"
"Sorry, it's been sometime since I saw the article."
"YOU'RE A LIAR AND A TROLL!"
<Begin argument.>


Someone with no connection to this managed to find the article fairly quickly. You made no effort. You were clearly more interested in arguing and playing the victim then actually finding any proof of your own claims.

#145
Gongon11

Gongon11
  • Members
  • 153 messages
Well you are a liar and a troll

#146
ziloe

ziloe
  • Members
  • 3 088 messages

crimzontearz wrote...

what the OP said is not happening....

yet

if Bioware published a Mass Effect trilogy with updated graphics and ME3 gameplay for the whole run I would legit drop happily 150 dolnlars on it no question asked


You sir, and/or mam, are awesome. If this had been posted earlier, the thread might have gone a very different direction. That's all I really wanted. A discussion on it. I would too totally drop 150 bucks for said creation. :D

#147
izmirtheastarach

izmirtheastarach
  • Members
  • 5 298 messages

ziloe wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

what the OP said is not happening....

yet

if Bioware published a Mass Effect trilogy with updated graphics and ME3 gameplay for the whole run I would legit drop happily 150 dolnlars on it no question asked


You sir, and/or mam, are awesome. If this had been posted earlier, the thread might have gone a very different direction. That's all I really wanted. A discussion on it. I would too totally drop 150 bucks for said creation. :D


If you hard started the thread with that premise , you would have gotten the discussion you claim to want.

So yes. Even though what your'e suggesting is basically impossible, it would be awesome, and I would also pay $150 for it.

Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 20 février 2012 - 06:15 .


#148
Gongon11

Gongon11
  • Members
  • 153 messages

ziloe wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

what the OP said is not happening....

yet

if Bioware published a Mass Effect trilogy with updated graphics and ME3 gameplay for the whole run I would legit drop happily 150 dolnlars on it no question asked


You sir, and/or mam, are awesome. If this had been posted earlier, the thread might have gone a very different direction. That's all I really wanted. A discussion on it. I would too totally drop 150 bucks for said creation. :D


what you were stating in your post was what you believed to be fact though?

#149
Legion64

Legion64
  • Members
  • 2 126 messages

Gongon11 wrote...

ziloe wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

what the OP said is not happening....

yet

if Bioware published a Mass Effect trilogy with updated graphics and ME3 gameplay for the whole run I would legit drop happily 150 dolnlars on it no question asked


You sir, and/or mam, are awesome. If this had been posted earlier, the thread might have gone a very different direction. That's all I really wanted. A discussion on it. I would too totally drop 150 bucks for said creation. :D


what you were stating in your post was what you believed to be fact though?


This. OP suddening changes his trolling plans.

#150
ziloe

ziloe
  • Members
  • 3 088 messages

izmirtheastarach wrote...

ziloe wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

what the OP said is not happening....

yet

if Bioware published a Mass Effect trilogy with updated graphics and ME3 gameplay for the whole run I would legit drop happily 150 dolnlars on it no question asked


You sir, and/or mam, are awesome. If this had been posted earlier, the thread might have gone a very different direction. That's all I really wanted. A discussion on it. I would too totally drop 150 bucks for said creation. :D


If you hard started the thread with that premise , you would have gotten the discussion you claim to want.

So yes. Even though what your'e suggesting is basically impossible, it would be awesome, and I would also pay $150 for it.




I wouldn't say it's impossible. They really only would need to redo the first two games, as the third one is all the improvements already. And hey, if you're an Elder Scrolls fan, most of us waited 5 years for the next installment. :)