Megaton_Hope wrote...
]If she hadn't subsequently been harassed by internet hooligans, would you feel that what she says above is justified, or does victimization change your system of ethics? Because at the time she made these statements, none of the subsequent harassment had occurred. My understanding is that it's when this material was discovered and shared (in screencapture format) by a Redditor that things blew up into what has happened since.
Yes, I would. I'm one of those not-so-hardcore gamers. I love story, and I have devoted an inordinate amount of time to playing Dragon Age...for its story. I'm no less a fan of the game than you or anyone else who qualifies as a hardcore gamer. My money's just as good for Bioware as is yours. But I do hate slogging through combat over and over and over again, when it is not my favorite part of the game. And from what others have said in this and other threads, I assure you, we're a measurable percentage of Bioware's fans. Hardcore gamers don't get to keep pretending that there aren't a good many...er...softcore fans who enjoy games just as much as they do, but for entirely different reasons.
Megaton_Hope wrote...
Probably the best thing for everyone, in the long term, would be for Hepler to make a very public, carefully planned statement clarifying her initial remarks without the word "vagina" in it, for EA/Bioware to continue their unequivocal support, and for everyone to go on with their lives, all forgiven.
This united front business...not so much. Time is of large supply and short demand on the internet; as long as anybody cares it will keep coming up in some form.
Why should Hepler have to clarify? I think what she said was pretty clear and didn't need much clarification. Unless you mean the political form of clarification, in which you want her to backtrack and take back everything she said. But why should she have to do that?
It should be enough that Hepler was going to annoy some people...but that she was going to strike a chord with others. I didn't see Hepler say that she spoke for ALL of any one group. She said that she felt she represented some. The only one equating that with a blanket whole-sale generalization that Hepler speaks for all women, is you.
Bioware's unequivocal support is based on the fact that Hepler was unduly harrassed, threatened, and stalked. Whatever she might have said to make some bottomfeeders feel justified in going after her is irrelevant. Bioware isn't supporting her because of what she said, but because of the abuse she was subjected to? Why should they not offer unequivocal support for that?