Bluumberry wrote...
chuzo wrote...
3. Spread the word of Bioware/EA’s unethical behavior (not that it needs any more spreading )
"unethical"? Do you even know what that means?
I do do you?
Bluumberry wrote...
chuzo wrote...
3. Spread the word of Bioware/EA’s unethical behavior (not that it needs any more spreading )
"unethical"? Do you even know what that means?
wrdnshprd wrote...
still not hearing the apologists give an explanation as to how this DLC is different from the zaeed and shale dlc that was FREE regardless of version, as long as you bought the game new..
exactly why couldnt they do the same thing with this dlc?
still waiting for a response..
yeah, thats what i thought.
THIS is why people are upset. and they have every right to be.
Whoa man watch the language before stanely woo comes in here, you'll get this blocked. <_<Tazzmission wrote...
rumbalumba wrote...
OmegaXI wrote...
Dear god people DLC is the way the gaming industry works now. One it keeps the people who make the games we love working longer. Two it is a way to add more to the product. Besides its ten bucks and you don't have to buy it.
Back on topic any word on when the trailers and images are coming out for the Day 1 DLC?
WRONG. Bioware employees work on a contractual-basis. so it's utter bullcrap if you think Bioware lays off employees after making ME3 and by doing DLC they can work longer. utter and total BS. it's in their clauses to work on a DLC, it's been planned from the start. they don't sit there and say "oh god we dont wanna lay you off therefore you need something to do for our fans". that's stupid and just false.
fact is that you're already paying $60 for a brand new, full game. and they want you to shell out $10 for a COMPLETE experiece? do they think people are so stupid and naive?
oh god seriously shut up thats the WHOLE WHOLE WHOLE FN industry!
are you seriously mentally challenged or do you just pull things out of your behind?
Tazzmission wrote...
rumbalumba wrote...
OmegaXI wrote...
Dear god people DLC is the way the gaming industry works now. One it keeps the people who make the games we love working longer. Two it is a way to add more to the product. Besides its ten bucks and you don't have to buy it.
Back on topic any word on when the trailers and images are coming out for the Day 1 DLC?
WRONG. Bioware employees work on a contractual-basis. so it's utter bullcrap if you think Bioware lays off employees after making ME3 and by doing DLC they can work longer. utter and total BS. it's in their clauses to work on a DLC, it's been planned from the start. they don't sit there and say "oh god we dont wanna lay you off therefore you need something to do for our fans". that's stupid and just false.
fact is that you're already paying $60 for a brand new, full game. and they want you to shell out $10 for a COMPLETE experiece? do they think people are so stupid and naive?
oh god seriously shut up thats the WHOLE WHOLE WHOLE FN industry!
are you seriously mentally challenged or do you just pull things out of your behind?
Modifié par Dionkey, 23 février 2012 - 07:51 .
BobSmith101 wrote...
Lufven1 wrote...
AlanC9 wrote...
DJBare wrote...
This, it would have been an epic moment, but now it's just "oh hey there prothy, sleep well?. lets got kick some ass"kidbd15 wrote...
Wouldn't you rather have been surprised by the Prothean reveal in-game instead of it being marketed as a DLC to buy?
Sure, but that cat's been out of the bag for months.
They would have announced the DLC tomorrow if it weren't for that xbox-market-fail. And don't come and say that everybody knew about it. Only people willing to invest a lot of time finding it or reading forums would. I'm not saying that it's anything wrong with that but I'm guessing 99% of the Mass Effect audience don't do that.
This has gone beyond the forums. The thing is if you could challenge them legally it would more than likely result in the delay of ME3 and I don't want hordes of people after me. Although some hotshot legal eagle could have some fun with this just in publicity terms.
wrdnshprd wrote...
still not hearing the apologists give an explanation as to how this DLC is different from the zaeed and shale dlc that was FREE regardless of version, as long as you bought the game new..
exactly why couldnt they do the same thing with this dlc?
still waiting for a response..
yeah, thats what i thought.
THIS is why people are upset. and they have every right to be.
Actually, I do believe that he was intended to be DLC from the beginning. I think it will be interesting to see how much of an impact he has on the overall story. If he doesn't really have one (as I suspect is likely), then I wonder if the tune will change or not. People often claim their arguments to be logical when they are really very emotional. If the Prothean has no real bearing on the story, then will the angry people subside? Or will they cling to their anger?AlanC9 wrote...
DJBare wrote...
For a lot of people like me who have been trying very hard to avoid details in case of spoilers it, the cat was only just let out of the bag.AlanC9 wrote...
Sure, but that cat's been out of the bag for months.
IIRC it was widely talked about this summer. I can see how Bio might have felt that it's just common knowledge by now; sorry that you weren't able to get to the release without hearing it.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if the original plan was for this to have been a big reveal, and it was only after the leak that Bio decided to make Prothy into the day 1 DLC rather than something else.
wrdnshprd wrote...
still not hearing the apologists give an explanation as to how this DLC is different from the zaeed and shale dlc that was FREE regardless of version, as long as you bought the game new..
exactly why couldnt they do the same thing with this dlc?
still waiting for a response..
yeah, thats what i thought.
THIS is why people are upset. and they have every right to be.
Tazzmission wrote...
seriously read the first fn post
“From Ashes” includes the Prothean squad mate, an adventure on Eden Prime, a new weapon, and an alternate appearance for every squad mate. Note that these alternate appearances are in addition to the ones already advertised in the CE.
pay attention before you speak
Modifié par MostlyAutumn, 23 février 2012 - 07:49 .
CDRSkyShepard wrote...
pavi132 wrote...
Niemack Saarinen wrote...
pavi132 wrote...
What bugs me is that they were thinking about DLC before the game was even finished. To me, DLC shouldn't even be considered until the main game is complete. Otherwise, whether consciously or not, the DLC will have an impact on the development of the main game, even if the two are made by separate teams, and could even dilute the quality of the main game as a result. That is what worries me most about this. While they can tell us that one has no effect on the other, it is hard for me to believe that.
You cant finish the story then go "Oh well lets add something here about.." they need the fore-thought while creating the base game of how everything is going to inter-connect together, not pasted on crudely at the end.
The problem with what you're saying is that they are essentially not making a complete game if they project to have things in the game ahead of time but choose to make them DLC instead. They should focus on making a complete game in its entirety first so they don't compromise the creation by withholding certain aspects for DLC and then add DLC later that maybe answers questions fans may still have or include more lore in side missions.
They always come up with ideas to tack on to the main story while making a game. Kasumi's files are present in the main ME2 game, but her DLC wasn't done until after the game released. Jessica Merizan said herself that the DLC team has been busy coming up with ideas while the others were finishing the main game. They're add ons, probably stories they've come up with after the writing of the final drafts is already complete. I don't claim to actually know anything about it, that would just make sense to me. Maybe someone had a great idea, but not in time to include it in the actual game. I doubt anyone sits around, rubbing their hands together maniacally and thinks of ways to screw us out of our money.
People don't seem to understand that DLCs are add ons, they don't make the game "complete." If a 30 hour game with a clearly defined beginning and end isn't complete to you, I don't know what is.
How many times do we have to spell this out. Bioware said the game was devolped after the game was finished. Files from the dlc are in the demo which is based a unfinished build of the game. That is a lie.ArkkAngel007 wrote...
chuzo wrote...
Let’s summarize what Bioware has done this far:
1. Spoiled the game
2. Milked the hell out of ME 3
3. Lied
4. Pissed lots of their loyal customers
Good job!
How to make things right?
1. Don’t buy / cancel preorder
2. Make sure your friend and friends of your friends etc. do the same
3. Spread the word of Bioware/EA’s unethical behavior (not that it needs any more spreading )
End of ripping of consumers, milking and dissecting of the games
Profit.
1. Microsoft did that, on two occassions now.
2. How? Through pre-order incentives? Two of the three guns will be available at some point for everyone. The DLC included elsewhere is already in the game, just a quicker/garunteed way to procure it.
3. They did not.
4. Hey 1 out of 4! Good job!
GuyIncognito21 wrote...
ArkkAngel007 wrote...
Which I agree with as long as the content was actually cut from the main game in its intended, retail form.
Well the word "intended" is problematic here, because you're basically saying that as long as they "intend" from the jump to hold something back, that's OK. But if they get 75% of the way through the dev cycle and decide to rip it out, that's no good.
I don't draw that distinction.
To me, the question is simple. In fact I posed this question to the dev who said he'd read every page, and I said I'd take his response at face value. I've yet to see a response:
The bit question for me is: in a world where they could only charge $60 for the game (i.e. no for-profit DLC, no preorder bonuses, no frills), would this content still exist?
If the answer is yes, then the DLC is cut content and a ripoff. If the answer is no, then the DLC is not cut content and it only looks like a ripoff because the timing is so shady.
If I could get an answer to that from someone in a position to know, it would allay a lot of my concerns.
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Whats your problem?Tazzmission wrote...
MostlyAutumn wrote...
rumbalumba wrote...
again, ONLY the squadmate + mission.
the skins, weapon, etc. in "From Ashes" is not in the CE.
Again, no, From Ashes is fully included in CE and DDE.
seriously read the first fn post
- “From Ashes” includes the Prothean squad mate, an adventure on Eden Prime, a new weapon, and an alternate
[color=rgb(170, 170, 170)">appearance for ]every [/color]squad mate. Note that these alternate appearances are in addition to the ones already advertised in the CE.
pay attention before you speak
Good riddance, I say... in fact, Bioware couldn't block this thread faster!Calians wrote...
Whoa man watch the language before stanely woo comes in here, you'll get this blocked. <_<
Daywalker315 wrote...
hitorihanzo wrote...
Have a question. Why are people still defending BioWare? If people decide that they want to boycott this game because it violates a principle that they have, why do you care? It's not like you won't still be able to buy the game. I'm sure that there will even be a few extra copies of the CE due to this. So, why are you still here trying to change people's minds.
That was like... four questions. Sorry. Lol.
Personally, I'm defending them to balance out all the people acting like they killed their first-born child. I bought the CE based on the promise that I'd get a bonus DLC and character so other people paying $10 for that optional experience doesn't seem so bad. I'm trying to make a few people change their minds about this being the end of the world because I want as many people as possible playing ME3. I love the series and I want others to enjoy it too.
Modifié par Tazzmission, 23 février 2012 - 07:48 .
CDRSkyShepard wrote...
They always come up with ideas to tack on to the main story while making a game. Kasumi's files are present in the main ME2 game, but her DLC wasn't done until after the game released. Jessica Merizan said herself that the DLC team has been busy coming up with ideas while the others were finishing the main game. They're add ons, probably stories they've come up with after the writing of the final drafts is already complete. I don't claim to actually know anything about it, that would just make sense to me. Maybe someone had a great idea, but not in time to include it in the actual game. I doubt anyone sits around, rubbing their hands together maniacally and thinks of ways to screw us out of our money.
People don't seem to understand that DLCs are add ons, they don't make the game "complete." If a 30 hour game with a clearly defined beginning and end isn't complete to you, I don't know what is.
CDRSkyShepard wrote...
BobSmith101 wrote...
That means Bioware could release the DLC free and not face action (legal) from CE buyers.
Heh. Funny, I was told I wouldn't have to pay for this DLC if I bought the CE, and not the SE. I was told if I bought the SE I'd have to pay for this DLC. So you're telling me that if that no longer becomes true, I wasn't lied to? Forget legal action for a minute...think about what you're saying. We're here discussing ethics of DLC, let's talk ethics in general: just because it's legal, does it mean that it's ethical, too?
fropas wrote...
wrdnshprd wrote...
still not hearing the apologists give an explanation as to how this DLC is different from the zaeed and shale dlc that was FREE regardless of version, as long as you bought the game new..
exactly why couldnt they do the same thing with this dlc?
still waiting for a response..
yeah, thats what i thought.
THIS is why people are upset. and they have every right to be.
How can I answer for Bioware? It's free for me. I bought the CE, so they kind of are doing the sasme thing. . .for me.
Modifié par fatalmaverick, 23 février 2012 - 07:52 .
Tazzmission wrote...
yea i feel you. i bought the ce also mainly for the litho, armors, prothean + mission and ost for that matter
i mean its only 10 bucks and people act like if they demand 30 or 50 or w/e
they feel they are entiled to every little thing free when in fact they ( whiners or us) dont deserve jack so we should be gratefull
I think there's a lot of misinformation out there and I wish the guy who made the initial video about it would have had an open mind before jumping to conclusions based on a leak we weren't ready to address. Since I'm a BioWare employee, I know people won't automatically trust me, but I hope people will consider that it wasn't cut content from the larger game. I was in Edmonton when we were finishing the game in November/December and I was in Edmonton again last month when they were working on the Day 1 DLC. It definitely was only possible to do because the main game was in certification (which means we had to wait for people to test it and make sure everything was good etc before we could get the greenlight to sell it). I also played the game WITHOUT the DLC in my first playthrough and honestly, it's an awesome addition but I was more than happy with what I was given in the game. It's bigger and more expansive than ever. Of course, I understand the concern but I hope we can all have an intelligent conversation about it and cover what the facts are in this situation.Hope that helps a little bit. This is an awkward format to answer this question, but I know I could explain it if you were sitting next to me on a couch with some coffee/tea
I don't honestly think there is a lack of understanding here about the process - I for one certainly don't subscribe to the theory that this is content "cut" from the original game, in that it was already complete and excised from it.I do however, as a collectors edition purchaser, feel that a character so central to the lore of the series should have been included on day 1 for ALL purchasers, as an incentive to buy NEW rather than used.[1] It is a living, breathing PROTHEAN. I do beleive what you have said about it, and how you dont feel that it significantly detracts from the "experience" - but then I am not all that sure if that comforts me, or makes me even more upset. A living, breathing prothean, which has no impact on the story and gives no insight into the central lore of the series?I understand where you are coming from, but I cannot reconcile this given the circumstances. What was done with Mass Effect 2 made far more sense, both from a consumer/customer standpoint, and as good business sense.I can see that the idea behind adding multiplayer was to make that the new "value add" used to lock out used purchasers - and while I can appreciate that there might be some players that purchase used, and jump on the online pass, I think there are going to be a far higher number of players that simply purchase used anyways, and then pay 10 dollars for the DLC, still coming out ahead of buying new, and still resulting in less sales/money for Bioware. That is certainly what I would be doing if the money was not already gone and the sale already final for my collectors edition (best buy won't allow me to cancel).I appreciate you coming out to answer these questions, and realize there are certain things you cant or won't respond to - and I hope you understand I don't hold any ill will towards yourself, or anyone at Bioware specifically - I just feel this whole Prothean debacle was both poorly planned and poorly thought out from the start.
Modifié par DiabolicallyRandom, 23 février 2012 - 07:52 .
blindchaos wrote...
I mean no offense by my posts, I appreciate that this is a topic worthy of discussion and don't fault anyone for being upset. My only issue is with the framing of the argument. Everyone only seems to care because they either
A) Forgot that the CE was shipping out with a character, and that that character was going to come out as DLCDidn't care until it was revealed to be a Prothean and are now trying to frame this argument as one against DLC, when in fact they are more upset about it being a species they think is central to the narative.
If the argument is that a Prothean squad member should never have been offered as a promotional tool for the CE and should have always been in the SE, then I can understand and agree. Though I do think if that's the case this argument needed to have started back in June.
However, if the argument against this DLC is being framed around the broader issue of Day 1 DLC, and the cutting of content form a games release, then the passive acceptance of the CE's features in June hurts that argument.
I hope I am being clear, and I again mean no offense to anyone involved in this forum as I can appreciate how big an issue this is for all involved on both sides.
Modifié par Hardwired, 23 février 2012 - 07:52 .
TheStoner wrote...
How many times do we have to spell this out. Bioware said the game was devolped after the game was finished. Files from the dlc are in the demo which is based a unfinished build of the game. That is a lie.ArkkAngel007 wrote...
chuzo wrote...
Let’s summarize what Bioware has done this far:
1. Spoiled the game
2. Milked the hell out of ME 3
3. Lied
4. Pissed lots of their loyal customers
Good job!
How to make things right?
1. Don’t buy / cancel preorder
2. Make sure your friend and friends of your friends etc. do the same
3. Spread the word of Bioware/EA’s unethical behavior (not that it needs any more spreading )
End of ripping of consumers, milking and dissecting of the games
Profit.
1. Microsoft did that, on two occassions now.
2. How? Through pre-order incentives? Two of the three guns will be available at some point for everyone. The DLC included elsewhere is already in the game, just a quicker/garunteed way to procure it.
3. They did not.
4. Hey 1 out of 4! Good job!
Modifié par ArkkAngel007, 23 février 2012 - 07:52 .