WeWant wrote...
If I pay $60 for a game, I expect it to have the entire gaming experience that has been developped by the team so far. It's common sense.
Not only is it common sense, but it's industry standard since forever.
WeWant wrote...
If I pay $60 for a game, I expect it to have the entire gaming experience that has been developped by the team so far. It's common sense.
Making an assumption that people even can cancel the preorders or wont lose a deposit on it if required by the store.GuyIncognito21 wrote...
Monochrome Wench wrote...
Nope, some people would have issues if the DLC was a major reason they are purchasing the CE and it was decided to give the DLC to everyone for free.
Considering the fact that people who ordered the CE just for the DLC would have two weeks to cancel their CE orders and order the SE instead, I don't think that's much of an argument.
They'd be getting $20 (or 20 pounds) back and getting all the content they wanted in the first place.
The game has to be finished quite some time before launch, I can imagine the people not involved in the last stage of development (that's usually bug fixing) working in a DLC. Just because is released the same day doesn't mean they were developed at the same time or in the same process.jpzgoku wrote...
_symphony wrote...
Frankly, I don't believe the DLC is cut content from the main game.
How, Why? Anyway it was planned and is availiable before launch.
sean1804 wrote...
just a quick question if the "From Ashes" DLC was made free would everyone be happy?
CommanderCoffee wrote...
Okay, I get it. You're not a real person. You take jokes as reality, therefore we must breathe Carbon Dioxide, Up must be Down, and the Sun is a black hole. FTGE
GuyIncognito21 wrote...
sean1804 wrote...
just a quick question if the "From Ashes" DLC was made free would everyone be happy?
Of course. I think that's the entire issue. People should not have to pay for this kind of core content that is ready to go when the game launches.
It would also be acceptable if this content wasn't about the protheans, and was about some random human or turian or something instead.
It would also be acceptable if the content didn't exist at all (taking people at their word that it's not all that important to the main thrust of the game).
There are/were any number of ways for Bioware/EA to handle this in a way that was acceptable to most everyone.
GuyIncognito21 wrote...
sean1804 wrote...
just a quick question if the "From Ashes" DLC was made free would everyone be happy?
Of course. I think that's the entire issue. People should not have to pay for this kind of core content that is ready to go when the game launches.
It would also be acceptable if this content wasn't about the protheans, and was about some random human or turian or something instead.
It would also be acceptable if the content didn't exist at all (taking people at their word that it's not all that important to the main thrust of the game).
There are/were any number of ways for Bioware/EA to handle this in a way that was acceptable to most everyone.
jpzgoku wrote...
ArkkAngel007 wrote...
TheGoddess0fWar wrote...
jpzgoku wrote...
TheGoddess0fWar wrote...
It's to bad you all are complaining at the last second. If only you had protested months ago. Damn. That would of saved us 340 pages of nothing but circle-jerking. In the words of Admiral Hackett "You're preaching to the choir."
I think most of us that are upset didn't ever think to preorder the game, so we didn't know about this until news broke out on gaming websites.
People have had plenty of time to get their priorties straight.
Some people don't preorder. Some like to wait for the general reception of the game (who can blame them after games like DAII and Too Human?) before they spend $60+ on a game.
It also wasn't advertised as a Prothean. Briefly it was leaked a long while back, but not everyone spends every waking hour online for news on a game they may or may not want to purchase. While he isn't important in the game, the general consensus is that he is very important to the fans, and Casey stated that would be the case, hence why they chose to use him as DLC instead of leaving him in concept graveyard.
Now that people know who he is now in that DLC, they want him like any other fan would. But now we're being asked to shell out an extra $10 on the same day many were planning on buying a $60 game. People didn't buy the CE in the first place because quite a few can't really afford it (some are probably making a questionable choice financially in getting the SE alone), but now something they want and are used to being free is suddenly an additional $10 that they really don't have lying around to waste on DLC.
The fact that we only just received an official announcement this late, after CEs were bought up and so close to release, doesn't help the latter reasoning at all.
That's the issue on that side of the fence, and it isn't something to scoff at. People want to enjoy the game, but feel as if they are getting slighted with what is a questionable practice.
Good points
Monochrome Wench wrote...
Making an assumption that people even can cancel the preorders or wont lose a deposit on it if required by the store.
WeWant wrote...
RDSFirebane wrote...
jpzgoku wrote...
What priorities? To check up on a game months ahead of time that I was no way interesed enough in to preorder? I don't understand.
I don't understand if you didn't care enough to pre order and get it when it came out your were going to to what? wait for it to drop in price or buy it used? well I'm sorry but if you plan on buying it used then you really cant complain about paying 10 bucks for the Prothy DLC as BioWare sees no money from the used sale thats been an issue for sometime now.. so they catch it ya on the DLC.
You are not making sense.
People (me included) don't preorder the CE for any game because we just want the gaming experience, not all the consmumerism around it involving pretty costumes and useless stuff.
If I pay $60 for a game, I expect it to have the entire gaming experience that has been developped by the team so far. It's common sense.
sean1804 wrote...
just a quick question if the "From Ashes" DLC was made free would everyone be happy?
WeWant wrote...
I know, that's why I said "content that has been developped so far." There is no clear definition of when a game is complete or not. I'f you are a developer and you care about perfectioning your game, what should matter to you is putting as much content as possible in order to enhance it, instead of just filling some DLC quota prerequisited by EA.
GuyIncognito21 wrote...
CommanderCoffee wrote...
Okay, I get it. You're not a real person. You take jokes as reality, therefore we must breathe Carbon Dioxide, Up must be Down, and the Sun is a black hole. FTGE
It doesn't help your argument to respond to everything with insults and vitriol.
Good comedy almost always has truth underneath it. Sure, there are "man getting kicked in groin" jokes that don't serve any real purpose, but if you think there's never a point under it all, I feel sorry for how much you miss out on.
Kevin Lozandier wrote...
No. That is an opinion that is flawed if gaming development is truly fully understood to you.
As I asked you a while ago with no reply: Collector Edition of Comics have extra panels. Collector Edition of Movies have uncut material. Why can't Collector Edition of Games not have additional content to play with?
They never say is was an exclusive, but they surely made it vague enough so everyone thinking that's exclusive would jump and buy the CE without an afterthought.nitefyre410 wrote...
they decided to make him a Collectors Edition Exclusive DLC charater.(For A Collector Edition Exclusive character is nonsense in my opinon thats moot at this point.
jpzgoku wrote...
GuyIncognito21 wrote...
sean1804 wrote...
just a quick question if the "From Ashes" DLC was made free would everyone be happy?
Of course. I think that's the entire issue. People should not have to pay for this kind of core content that is ready to go when the game launches.
It would also be acceptable if this content wasn't about the protheans, and was about some random human or turian or something instead.
It would also be acceptable if the content didn't exist at all (taking people at their word that it's not all that important to the main thrust of the game).
There are/were any number of ways for Bioware/EA to handle this in a way that was acceptable to most everyone.
Disagree about the middle statement. They are still cutting content to be sold at a premium, when the content was planned and is available at launch.
CommanderCoffee wrote...
You refuse to listen to reason. When people present counterevidence, you manipulate it to use it against them. You got really damn close earlier to advocating piracy. Yet I'm the bad one here. Makes real good sense.
That's good comedy because it's mocking people like you who keep demanding a piece of optional nonessential DLC for free, which is an insult to people like me who have the CE and are guaranteed it as part of the package!
ArkkAngel007 wrote...
*snip*
Thank you. I know I'm in the middle and a bit more objective on the situation, and know a bit more background on what happened, which has caused quite a few head-butts from both sides. But I am understanding and very aware of why those who oppose it do so, and I share most of them.
All I try to do is make sure the correct information is out there so that people's arguments are sound and actually have weight to them. It's like when I earlier mispoke about the cost of the items in the CE. My other points were valid, as was my overall argument, but that one or two sentences that were incorrect made my post nothing but a target that was focused solely on the mistake, and not what my actual post was about.
Point being, while hard to believe, I'm not going at yours and other's posts because I can. I'm doing so for the sake of your, and the communities, argument against this practice.
Modifié par nitefyre410, 25 février 2012 - 06:13 .
GuyIncognito21 wrote...
Plus, and this is the key point, we aren't talking about ADDITIONAL content. We're talking about core content that should by all rights be in the game to begin with.
GuyIncognito21 wrote...
Kevin Lozandier wrote...
No. That is an opinion that is flawed if gaming development is truly fully understood to you.
Simply ranting that everyone who disagrees with you doesn't understand is not helpful. Not only is it not helpful, it doesn't get me any closer to understanding.As I asked you a while ago with no reply: Collector Edition of Comics have extra panels. Collector Edition of Movies have uncut material. Why can't Collector Edition of Games not have additional content to play with?
Well I can't speak about comics, but movies are not much of an analogue here. When you're talking about Director's cuts of movies, you're talking about material the director wanted in the movie in the first place that the studio cut out.
Kingdom of Heaven was a great (or horrible, depending on your outlook) example of this. Ridley Scott's vision of the movie was three hours long and fantastic. The studio's vision was two hours long and incoherent.
We don't really have that dynamic going on here. And even if we did, they don't stick two versions of the movie in the theater and ask more money for the one with the full content in it.
Plus, and this is the key point, we aren't talking about ADDITIONAL content. We're talking about core content that should by all rights be in the game to begin with.
Modifié par Kevin Lozandier, 25 février 2012 - 06:15 .
GuyIncognito21 wrote...
CommanderCoffee wrote...
You refuse to listen to reason. When people present counterevidence, you manipulate it to use it against them. You got really damn close earlier to advocating piracy. Yet I'm the bad one here. Makes real good sense.
Piracy should in my opinion be viewed as a necessary evil, and one that has the potential to keep game companies honest. That's not advocacy, that's acknowledgment.
And I didn't call you "bad" or anything of the sort. I'm simply saying that you seem to have completely missed the point of that video. Just because he's playing a character does not mean the words coming out of that character's mouth are not his real opinion, anymore than the words coming out of the 8 year olds on South Park contain kernels of Trey Parker and Matt Stone's real opinions.That's good comedy because it's mocking people like you who keep demanding a piece of optional nonessential DLC for free, which is an insult to people like me who have the CE and are guaranteed it as part of the package!
Yeah, I think you really missed the point of that video if that's what you got out of it.
RDSFirebane wrote...
Not to jump between you two. But ^ why? It's always been about Shep. Stopping the Reapers with the Pro. just being the race that gave him the chance to do it they have always played a back seat role in the story as Shep. was doing everything the fact one is alive and breathing isnt really changeing much other then the fact he might be able to clear some stuff up. you act like he has a hidden god mode on him or something.