nitefyre410 wrote...
Boycotting is going to far - yes
The whole Origin issues that people are having this just compounded and how its needed to play ME 3 when they don't really want it, then add how this whole Character was handled. On top of old lingering doubts left buy how people about Dragon Age 2. Plus Bioware here latetly has been disavowing and then confirming left and right... you don't what to believe or not and you have a powder keg waiting to go. This has been building for while now... the signs have been there... kind like tremors before a major earthquake.
The DLC was just the match to set it off.
By character I hope you mean the entirety of "From Ashes" DLC? It's not up to us how a character should/should not be written, and there's more than just a character involved, one that few here know anything about past what has been "officially" given.
But yeah, it was a poor marketing decision. It's ok to be controversial if you have a rather clean record with your fans but here:
1)Owned by EA, which supports restrictive DRM and forces the inclusion of multiplayer in its in-house titles.
2)The disappointment of DAII, from the rushed development and consequences, and the debacle following that BioWare engineer's userreview for the game.
3)ME3 requiring Origin. Obviously, this is a major issue with me, as I'm the head of the group against that decision (Though Furtled deserves the credit on keeping it going while I've been stuck in the office and labs), and the majority of PC gamers who keep up on things are at the very least concerned.
So now we have this decision, where the timing and the manner was just bad in its "official" reveal. Will it generate more interest? Yes. Does that mean that will provide more sales? No.





Retour en haut





