Aller au contenu

Photo

If one Reaper attacked present-day Earth


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
253 réponses à ce sujet

#126
DrwEddy

DrwEddy
  • Members
  • 259 messages
We all gonna be f***ed. Image IPB

Modifié par DrwEddy, 24 février 2012 - 12:40 .


#127
ODST 3

ODST 3
  • Members
  • 1 429 messages
It wouldn't dare while I'm here.

#128
ArkkAngel007

ArkkAngel007
  • Members
  • 2 514 messages
Military affiliate here. Depending on make-up of the Reaper exoskeleton, an atmospheric nuclear detonation would be a viable option, provided we can deliver the payload to the target successfully. More than likely we would not, especially if the Reaper has begun indoctrination and conversion procedures, as well as have the support of Occuli. There is also no telling how the Reaper could affect our equipment. We know they can block communications, but could they discharge a form of EMP (such as the husks in the original game were able to).

All in all, we don't have the technology to overcome a Reaper. I also believe that leadership will focus too much on a large, traditional assault to put on a show and restore confidence to provide the early victory we would need.

#129
Farbautisonn

Farbautisonn
  • Members
  • 3 083 messages

ArkkAngel007 wrote...
 I also believe that leadership will focus too much on a large, traditional assault to put on a show and restore confidence to provide the early victory we would need.


-HAHA.... spot on! I agree 100%

#130
Guest_Hello Man_*

Guest_Hello Man_*
  • Guests
We be screwed period end of story.

#131
tobynator89

tobynator89
  • Members
  • 1 618 messages

shepard1038 wrote...

TexasToast712 wrote...

By lore, kinetic barriers only block incoming projectiles of great speeds. Therefore, to destroy the reaper all it would require is that someone get close enough to plant a Nuclear bomb of sufficent strength.

Like a nuclear mine.Image IPB

that wouldn't even scratch it . The thing brushes of the equivalent of taking all the power in a standard tactical nuclear warhead , transfer it to kinetic power (which is a lot more efficient) and use it to drive a nail through a plank.  oh, and it does this WITHOUT kinetic barriers.

Modifié par tobynator89, 24 février 2012 - 01:03 .


#132
InsaneAzrael

InsaneAzrael
  • Members
  • 441 messages
1. Give CoD players real guns.
2. Put them in the Reaper.
3. ???
4. Profit

#133
Carnage752

Carnage752
  • Members
  • 1 113 messages

ArkkAngel007 wrote...

Military affiliate here. Depending on make-up of the Reaper exoskeleton, an atmospheric nuclear detonation would be a viable option, provided we can deliver the payload to the target successfully. More than likely we would not, especially if the Reaper has begun indoctrination and conversion procedures, as well as have the support of Occuli. There is also no telling how the Reaper could affect our equipment. We know they can block communications, but could they discharge a form of EMP (such as the husks in the original game were able to).

All in all, we don't have the technology to overcome a Reaper. I also believe that leadership will focus too much on a large, traditional assault to put on a show and restore confidence to provide the early victory we would need.

I call suicide Spec Ops squad that places the bomb at the center of the Reaper!

To be fair, I know my way around a gun. And a plane. ;)

#134
tobynator89

tobynator89
  • Members
  • 1 618 messages
Imagine if a tactical nuke went of 2 km from a M1A1 abrahams MBT. The tank would survive the heat and pressure just fine. Another tank on the other hand could at the same distance take it out with an APFSDS kinetic penetrator despite the fact that the nuke had 30 kilotons equivalent of TNT and the shell had about a few kilos worth of explosives behind it. Now give the shell the same energy as the nuke. its penetrative power is roughly a million times more effective than the tsar bomba, the most devestating human nuke ever made of about 50 megaton.

THE REAPER STILL BRUSHES IT OF LIKE NOTHING EVEN WITHOUT ITS BARRIERS!

#135
vanguard_of_destruction

vanguard_of_destruction
  • Members
  • 110 messages
have caboose talk to it.

#136
111987

111987
  • Members
  • 3 758 messages

tobynator89 wrote...

Imagine if a tactical nuke went of 2 km from a M1A1 abrahams MBT. The tank would survive the heat and pressure just fine. Another tank on the other hand could at the same distance take it out with an APFSDS kinetic penetrator despite the fact that the nuke had 30 kilotons equivalent of TNT and the shell had about a few kilos worth of explosives behind it. Now give the shell the same energy as the nuke. its penetrative power is roughly a million times more effective than the tsar bomba, the most devestating human nuke ever made of about 50 megaton.

THE REAPER STILL BRUSHES IT OF LIKE NOTHING EVEN WITHOUT ITS BARRIERS!


Wait, what?

Why would you detonate the nuke 2 kilometers away from the Reaper?

A nuke within a hundred feet or so would devastate a Reaper.

#137
MakeMineMako

MakeMineMako
  • Members
  • 1 289 messages
Unless the Reapers have some way to determine, on the spot, which are decoys and which are actually delivery vehicles (warheads), a MIRV strike from a small scale launch involving a few ICBMs should do the job. At least one or two should get down to the necessary altitude for an effective air burst.

Another option would be a cruise missile, such as the RGM/UGM-109E TLAM Block IV, AGM-86, or the AGM-129. These low flying delievery systems are hard to detect and hard to defend against, especially if used in numbers. How well they would fare against a Reaper is the question (depending on if the Reaper in question has any kind of support).

Direct hits from nuclear weapons are only necessary if we are talking about hitting a Reaper in a vacuum, such as in orbit. An air burst should be enough to kill or cripple it.

Modifié par MakeMineMako, 24 février 2012 - 02:03 .


#138
TornadoADV

TornadoADV
  • Members
  • 291 messages
A Dreadnought spinal mass driver delievers a round at 1.2 KT payload. And SRAM-II has a 300 KT payload, a B-1B Lancer can carry 36 of them. We have 100 Lancers, that's a mass barrage of 3,600 seperate warheads with a combined explosive power of 1.8 Gigatons (1,080 Megatons, 1,080,000 Kilotons). A Reaper wouldn't be even remotely capable of withstanding such an assault even if we let it shoot down 99% of the incoming SRAM-IIs.

Too many people today can't wrap their head around how powerful actual modern militaries are, how well trained they are and how ready they are. I blame videogames and movies for projecting this false picture of impotency and ineptitude that borders on staggeringly insane.

#139
NM_Che56

NM_Che56
  • Members
  • 6 739 messages
I'd give it a cold

#140
Dansayshi

Dansayshi
  • Members
  • 705 messages
WE FIGHT OR WE DIE

Meanwhile on the reaper ship

*they face extinction, and their last collective words as a race were "we fight or we die?" lolololol

#141
Dragoonlordz

Dragoonlordz
  • Members
  • 9 920 messages
It would stop at a drive through McDonalds pick up a large mac and coke. Intercept our TV channels and watch Jerry Springer after which would leave in order to preserve it's sanity. As to what I would do, I would wave to him from my position of the pole on Springers stage.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 24 février 2012 - 02:43 .


#142
RAF1940

RAF1940
  • Members
  • 1 598 messages

annihilator27 wrote...

Carnage752 wrote...

bwg888 wrote...

Carnage752 wrote...

annihilator27 wrote...

If its just one, Nuke it.

It would shoot it out of the air. Hell, it's barriers would probably brush it off.


I was just gonna mention this, people underestimate the power of nuclear weapons, even compared to fancy-pants future weapons. It's just that they're so unwieldy. But one reaper wouldn't stand a chance against the stockpile of even one major nation

Reapers are fast though. Watch that sucker fly off from Eden Prime for example.


F*** It, Im launching a suicide mission to plant a nuke in it.Whose in?


I'm in. XD

#143
RAF1940

RAF1940
  • Members
  • 1 598 messages

InsaneAzrael wrote...

1. Give CoD players real guns.
2. Put them in the Reaper.
3. ???
4. Profit


LMFAO

#144
double02

double02
  • Members
  • 1 025 messages
We'd all die. Even if we managed to make the discovery on Mars.

#145
double02

double02
  • Members
  • 1 025 messages

RAF1940 wrote...

InsaneAzrael wrote...

1. Give CoD players real guns.
2. Put them in the Reaper.
3. ???
4. Profit


LMFAO


lol that might work...

#146
AxisEvolve

AxisEvolve
  • Members
  • 2 738 messages

InsaneAzrael wrote...

1. Give CoD players real guns.
2. Put them in the Reaper.
3. ???
4. Profit

They would run away crying.

#147
double02

double02
  • Members
  • 1 025 messages
Unless the other species come to our rescue....

Modifié par double02, 24 février 2012 - 02:56 .


#148
MakeMineMako

MakeMineMako
  • Members
  • 1 289 messages

RAF1940 wrote...

annihilator27 wrote...

Carnage752 wrote...

bwg888 wrote...

Carnage752 wrote...

annihilator27 wrote...

If its just one, Nuke it.

It would shoot it out of the air. Hell, it's barriers would probably brush it off.


I was just gonna mention this, people underestimate the power of nuclear weapons, even compared to fancy-pants future weapons. It's just that they're so unwieldy. But one reaper wouldn't stand a chance against the stockpile of even one major nation

Reapers are fast though. Watch that sucker fly off from Eden Prime for example.


F*** It, Im launching a suicide mission to plant a nuke in it.Whose in?


I'm in. XD


Judging from your username, I figured you would do the awesome thing and tackle the Reaper in one of these:

Image IPB

#149
CroGamer002

CroGamer002
  • Members
  • 20 673 messages

AxisEvolve wrote...

InsaneAzrael wrote...

1. Give CoD players real guns.
2. Put them in the Reaper.
3. ???
4. Profit

They would run away crying.


I don't think that was his point.:devil:

#150
Lord Jaric

Lord Jaric
  • Members
  • 436 messages
I'd just fire a curise missle up its ass and guide by remote control.