Scary Shepard wrote...
Whilst I've always understood this is a sensitive issue from a moral perspective, as far as I can see video games are simply joining a long list of other consumer goods where the core product can be enhanced and upgraded (providing the consumer pays for it) if they would so desire.
I've used this metaphor previously, but damn it I'm going to do it again. If I were to go out and purchase a car, I wouldn't demand that the best sound system should be installed for free, or that I should get leather trim just because as a consumer, I'm entitled to the best version of a product regardless of what I pay for it. The car is still functional in its intended role regardless of how many additional mod-cons I buy.
There's no end of goods this applies to: computers, kitchen appliances, TVs, garden equipment, even children's toys. All can have attachments/modifications/accessories bought for them from the manufacturer, if the consumer so wishes.
Why should a game be treated differently, simply because it's digital media?
I'm fine with things being added on, what I'm not ok with is stuff being taken out of the game so they can charge me for it later.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




