TwistedComplex wrote...
ascension87 wrote...
Poor baby.
Poor baby who still has $60 dollars
Oh my god! I bow before your riches.
TwistedComplex wrote...
ascension87 wrote...
Poor baby.
Poor baby who still has $60 dollars
ascension87 wrote...
Oh my god! I bow before your riches.
TwistedComplex wrote...
ascension87 wrote...
Oh my god! I bow before your riches.
Sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of me not going 60$ to EA.
XD quite possiblyTezlaa wrote...
TheStoner wrote...
Wow. I havn't seen anyone above the age of ten just plain assert the opposite and think that it was a valid responce.Carnage752 wrote...
Nope. Thanks for trying though.TheStoner wrote...
They could strip all but 4 companions from ME2 and have no effect on the story.
You are a stoner though, you just forget
Exia001 wrote...
I have no problem with peoples problem with BW. What I take issue with is the insults people get hurled at them because they think differently, so what if someones a 'biodrone' id they like to buy the games, whats the issue it doesnt impact you in any way. If somone likes something then they do, whats the problem?
Actually, if they were lying, I'd notice (Since I wasn't buying the DLC) and would get pissed. And now basically contradicting yourself. Your saying he's important, now your saying he's not. All the more reason I'll believe Bioware, you can't even keep your story straight. If he's not important, then this discussion is over. Bioware has stated he's not important, they have their hands tied so they can't really lie, and you offer no proof and basically telling us to take your word with absolutely no backup at all. Excuse me if I pick the logical choice.TwistedComplex wrote...
Carnage752 wrote...
I'm not buying the DLC either for the record. But going on.
Here's the difference, you can talk out of your ass with no ramifications (Like now). Mass Effect 3 comes out in two weeks. If the Prothean really was important to the story, people would notice. There would be a huge uproar over the fact that Bioware is now lying. In other words, Bioware CAN'T lie, you can. So I'll believe them. Wanna try again?
You're assuming:
A) That every non DLC character is vital to the story. Which is wrong. The only character i can see being vital to the story is Liara since she can't die.
AndEven if Bioware WAS lying, you're assuming that people like yourself wouldn't valiently take arms in their defense.
ascension87 wrote...
No one cares my poor little child.
Carnage752 wrote...
Actually, if they were lying, I'd notice (Since I wasn't buying the DLC) and would get pissed.
Nuh uh. Oh wait that's your logicCarnage752 wrote...
Actually, if they were lying, I'd notice (Since I wasn't buying the DLC) and would get pissed. And now basically contradicting yourself. Your saying he's important, now your saying he's not. All the more reason I'll believe Bioware, you can't even keep your story straight. If he's not important, then this discussion is over. Bioware has stated he's not important, they have their hands tied so they can't really lie, and you offer no proof and basically telling us to take your word with absolutely no backup at all. Excuse me if I pick the logical choice.TwistedComplex wrote...
Carnage752 wrote...
I'm not buying the DLC either for the record. But going on.
Here's the difference, you can talk out of your ass with no ramifications (Like now). Mass Effect 3 comes out in two weeks. If the Prothean really was important to the story, people would notice. There would be a huge uproar over the fact that Bioware is now lying. In other words, Bioware CAN'T lie, you can. So I'll believe them. Wanna try again?
You're assuming:
A) That every non DLC character is vital to the story. Which is wrong. The only character i can see being vital to the story is Liara since she can't die.
AndEven if Bioware WAS lying, you're assuming that people like yourself wouldn't valiently take arms in their defense.
TwistedComplex wrote...
ascension87 wrote...
No one cares my poor little child.
Wait.. I.. I can't hear you. IT'S TOO LOUD IN HERE.
THE NOISE OF ME NOT GIVING MONEY TO EA IS GETTING LOUDER
Actually, there are threads giving proof that EVERY character still has a play in the story if they survived. You fail again.TwistedComplex wrote...
Carnage752 wrote...
Actually, if they were lying, I'd notice (Since I wasn't buying the DLC) and would get pissed.
No, you wouldn't, since it's a FACT that every character that can die in ME2 will have no bearing on ME3.
TwistedComplex wrote...
Carnage752 wrote...
Actually, if they were lying, I'd notice (Since I wasn't buying the DLC) and would get pissed.
No, you wouldn't, since it's a FACT that every character that can die in ME2 will have no bearing on ME3.
Carnage752 wrote...
Actually, there are threads giving proof that EVERY character still has a play in the story if they survived. You fail again.
I apologize Mr. Stoner, but I am busy fighting this guys "logic" to give you a sufficient response. My apologies.TheStoner wrote...
Nuh uh. Oh wait that's your logic
TwistedComplex wrote...
Sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of me not going 60$ to EA.
Carnage752 wrote...
I apologize Mr. Stoner, but I am busy fighting this guys "logic" to give you a sufficient response. My apologies.
Dry County wrote...
TwistedComplex wrote...
Sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of me not going 60$ to EA.
Random question: Why do you keep putting $ to the right of the number?
Dry County wrote...
Random question: Why do you keep putting $ to the right of the number?
Your still dodging my main post explaining all of it. You lost brutha. Go while you still have dignity.TwistedComplex wrote...
Carnage752 wrote...
Actually, there are threads giving proof that EVERY character still has a play in the story if they survived. You fail again.
Can the story progress without them?
Congradulations, they are not nessicary characters.