77 réponses à ce sujet

[Veggiesofmanycolors]

Mass Effect 2 is truly a stunning game, possibly the best use of the Unreal Engine III out there and a huge improvement over the original Mass Effect's. 
Being as consoles have pretty much peaked I don't expect as big of a graphical leap from 2 to 3 but is there any improvement at all?

I haven't played the demo as to avoid spoilers so what can you guys tell me who have seen it?

[Atakuma]

They are, but not by much.

[AkiKishi]

No they look worse.

[squee365]

Yes, on xbox at least.


Incidentally has anyone noticed how fast the loading screens are on the demo?

[Veggiesofmanycolors]

BobSmith101 wrote...

No they look worse.

Is this true?

[Atakuma]

Veggiesofmanycolors wrote...

BobSmith101 wrote...

No they look worse.

Is this true?

No.

[MartinDN]

In my opinion i honestly dont think they are...from a technical standpoint sure, but just looking back at even mass effect one, the main menu art with the characters are ****ing beautiful - anderson looks horrendous in 3, the imported and created characters also look horrendous the animations are janky, i honestly dont know what they do to make it worse, is it even possible ? Im sure others will like the new look its just my opinion that its bad.

It seems like with every new mass effect we always take one step forward then two steps back.

Modifié par MartinDN, 24 février 2012 - 06:53 .

[Balancer]

meh, i'm not gonna judge until the final game is out. And i dont really care about the graphics.

[Veggiesofmanycolors]

I can't take anyone who thinks the graphics in Mass Effect 1 are better than 2's seriously. Playing Mass Effect 1 after 2 is like going back a generation.

[Dragoonlordz]

Atakuma wrote...

Veggiesofmanycolors wrote...

BobSmith101 wrote...

No they look worse.

Is this true?

No.

On this we agree.

The graphics are an improvement especially in the models and character creator. The overall increase is not earth shattering but it is certainly an improvement.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 24 février 2012 - 06:56 .

[Davidicus]

I noticed an improvement, but nothing revolutionary.

[woods26]

It's hard to tell without playing the full game. Some areas look better and some worse according to the demo.

Modifié par woods26, 24 février 2012 - 06:57 .

[MartinDN]

Veggiesofmanycolors wrote...

I can't take anyone who thinks the graphics in Mass Effect 1 are better than 2's seriously. Playing Mass Effect 1 after 2 is like going back a generation.

I said the main menu art of wrex/ashley, which is in game renders. I never said the game graphics, i cant take anyone seriously who cant read, you sure your not trolling ?

[Unit-Alpha]

No, worse. They look about 3 years outdated now.

On PC, that is; I don't know how the console versions stack up.

Modifié par Unit-Alpha, 24 février 2012 - 06:59 .

[Dragoonlordz]

Unit-Alpha wrote...

No, worse. They look about 3 years outdated now.

On PC, that is; I don't know how the console versions stack up.

Not what they asked.

Asked if was better than ME2, it is. Not is it the best graphics ever seen in your life or best graphics of 2011 or 2012.

[hawat333]

Yep.
Next?

[stonbw1]

I'm making a playthrough on ME2 now (XBOX) and with a keener eye you can really notice that there are times in which it looks great and then times it looks very hackish. The discrepancy is surprising.

[AlanC9]

Lighting in the demo seems to be a lot better. Graphics overall look a bit better too.

Note that I'm running it on PC with a x1650 Pro, which might actually be below min spec.

[SidNitzerglobin]

Are we playing the same demo or are those saying the graphics are improved on 360 referring to videos/screenshots of gameplay from something other than the demo?

The 360 SP demo looks appreciably worse by my eyeballs than ME2. Still need to check out the PC ME3 demo.

I expect the gold version of ME3 to look/run at least as good if not incrementally better than ME2 regardless of platform, but from what I've played so far, this isn't the case IMO.

Modifié par SidNitzerglobin, 24 février 2012 - 07:15 .

[Balancer]

stonbw1 wrote...

I'm making a playthrough on ME2 now (XBOX) and with a keener eye you can really notice that there are times in which it looks great and then times it looks very hackish. The discrepancy is surprising.

I think that has to do with being a demo. you can only judge when the full game is out imo.

[Synthauti]

Yes, they're better (especially the lighting from what I can tell,) but they can only improve so much before they wind up hitting the limits of what a current-gen console can put out.

[slimgrin]

The second half of the demo stands out to me as having better graphics than ME2. Plus we get AA, which I don't think we had before. It's in the first part where I see those crappy up-close textures.

[Chromie]

They look better but once again PC users barely get anything better.

[Unit-Alpha]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Unit-Alpha wrote...

No, worse. They look about 3 years outdated now.

On PC, that is; I don't know how the console versions stack up.

Not what they asked.

Asked if was better than ME2, it is. Not is it the best graphics ever seen in your life or best graphics of 2011 or 2012.

Um, please learn to read: I said worse, as in worse than ME2.

Did you seriously not catch that?

No, they are not. They are far less polished.

Modifié par Unit-Alpha, 24 février 2012 - 07:23 .

[tommythetomcat]

PC high res texture pack will be great, even though it already looks better than me2.