806 réponses à ce sujet

[PnXMarcin1PL]

got to watch the new vids later

[AlexXIV]

This 'go and find war assetts' thing is kind of funny because you have been grounded for half a year. I mean they basically locked you up and now you have to waste time doing stuff you could have done by now while the galaxy burns. I don't know about everyone, but how are you supposed to feel sorry for the Alliance if they are the one to blame.

Modifié par AlexXIV, 29 février 2012 - 08:44 .

[DeathSwitch109]

Nathan Redgrave wrote...

Atakuma wrote...

K, the retail game sucks. Now we know. Rofl.

Er, no. The PS3 version has technical issues. That's all that was being said. And it's not unexpected; the PS3 version of ME2, which was supposedly running on ME3's engine, was a pretty bad port.

Technical hitches here and there but nothing too bad, it didn't ruin the overall experience. 

[Soulglow]

DeathSwitch109 wrote...

Nathan Redgrave wrote...

Atakuma wrote...

K, the retail game sucks. Now we know. Rofl.

Er, no. The PS3 version has technical issues. That's all that was being said. And it's not unexpected; the PS3 version of ME2, which was supposedly running on ME3's engine, was a pretty bad port.

Technical hitches here and there but nothing too bad, it didn't ruin the overall experience. 

I own both the PC and PS3 versions of ME2 and it was a horrible port. I was hoping they would improve the framerate but judging by the demo, I guess not. 

[Bad King]

Admiral Mikhailovich is a hero by the sound of it.

[jmood88]

El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...

wicked_being wrote...

"Timed" side quests?! NOOOO!

Thank you for making me laugh.

[Elite Midget]

Whatever the rate it I ask you all this.

Does anyone even care? I mean, it's IGN we're talking about here.

IGN.

[AndrewRogue]

I honestly don't know why people even look at ratings. The numbers/stars are totally useless. You get far more by actually reading the review. Yes, even from IGN.

[ZombifiedJake]

IGN and their "we're letting you know that we're reviewing a game" updates. Seriously useless.

[DeathSwitch109]

Soulglow wrote...

DeathSwitch109 wrote...

Nathan Redgrave wrote...

Atakuma wrote...

K, the retail game sucks. Now we know. Rofl.

Er, no. The PS3 version has technical issues. That's all that was being said. And it's not unexpected; the PS3 version of ME2, which was supposedly running on ME3's engine, was a pretty bad port.

Technical hitches here and there but nothing too bad, it didn't ruin the overall experience. 

I own both the PC and PS3 versions of ME2 and it was a horrible port. I was hoping they would improve the framerate but judging by the demo, I guess not. 

Not saying you're wrong but I own both versions as well. My PC version ran flawlessly for the most part but the only problems I encountered with the PS3 version was with the Vanguard's biotic charge which didn't occur very often. The framerate had very few hiccups. The only main issue was that the dialogue would cut out at the end, I fixed that with subtitles.

[Nashiktal]

Elite Midget wrote...

Whatever the rate it I ask you all this.

Does anyone even care? I mean, it's IGN we're talking about here.

IGN.

Don't care about the rating, but they do, on occasion, give a good writeup. Although they are biased when it comes to ME. 

I don't really like IGN, especially not after that Avatar the last airbender season review incident. >.>

[squee365]

http://ps3.ign.com/a.../1219416p1.html

Final update before they score it. Holy cow, they love it.

[SNascimento]

"A common question eager Mass Effect fans like to ask revolves around how Mass Effect 3 stacks up against Mass Effect 2. I wasn't quite sure how to adequately answer that as I trekked through the first half of the adventure. Mass Effect 2 in many ways represents the sheer potential of gaming, a force to be reckoned with that easily falls into the short list of best games of all-time. Indeed, for some of the experience, Mass Effect 3 actually felt weaker in many ways when compared to Mass Effect 2 just because it set the bar so high. But now, my feelings have markedly changed.

This change only made itself clear 15 or 20 hours into the game, when it becomes overwhelmingly obvious how intricately woven the sum parts of the Mass Effect series are. I found myself continually shaking my head in awe as things came together, not only from Mass Effect 2, but from Mass Effect itself. Even though I'm playing "fresh" on PlayStation 3, my extensive experience with Mass Effect and Mass Effect 2 on Xbox 360 allowed me to appreciate all of the odes, both major and minor, being thrown out to characters, events and conversations that had occurred in previous games. How BioWare accomplished all of this successfully borders on mind-boggling."
.
Very interesting.

[AlphaJarmel]

Yea I was thinking 8.5 prior to this update. Now it's certainly a lock at 9.5. The question is whether the narrative can boost it to a 10 or if the technical issues hold it back.

I do hate how the reviewer is going to review it right after playing the game in some hype filled tunnel and not wait a bit.

[squee365]

"EA has yet to give IGN access to the multiplayer servers to test it out for ourselves."

That would explain why we haven't seen any reviews other than this one "in progress." kinda stupid, but hey we take what we can get right?

[squee365]

AlphaJarmel wrote...

Yea I was thinking 8.5 prior to this update. Now it's certainly a lock at 9.5. The question is whether the narrative can boost it to a 10 or if the technical issues hold it back.

I do hate how the reviewer is going to review it right after playing the game in some hype filled tunnel and not wait a bit.

I think after they test out the multiplayer, we're looking at a 9.6-10.

[AlphaJarmel]

squee365 wrote...

AlphaJarmel wrote...

Yea I was thinking 8.5 prior to this update. Now it's certainly a lock at 9.5. The question is whether the narrative can boost it to a 10 or if the technical issues hold it back.

I do hate how the reviewer is going to review it right after playing the game in some hype filled tunnel and not wait a bit.

I think after they test out the multiplayer, we're looking at a 9.6-10.

IGN only scores by .5 now.  So either it's 9.5 or 10.

[Abisco]

squee365 wrote...

AlphaJarmel wrote...

Yea I was thinking 8.5 prior to this update. Now it's certainly a lock at 9.5. The question is whether the narrative can boost it to a 10 or if the technical issues hold it back.

I do hate how the reviewer is going to review it right after playing the game in some hype filled tunnel and not wait a bit.

I think after they test out the multiplayer, we're looking at a 9.6-10.

They do it by .5's, so I'm saying 9.5 for them...
The game seems like its FILLED with content. 

[Naltair]

This game will be amazing.

[squee365]

Abisco wrote...

The game seems like its FILLED with content. 

And people wonder why I want to read reviews...

[squee365]

http://www.ign.com/v...the-new-citadel

Tour of the Citadel...drool

[The Last Guardian]

Wonder why the 1st half felt weaker to him....

But yeah this sounds like he suddenly fell in love with me3. Gotta a feeling that the ending, and the mp might push it to 10. At the very least a 9.5.

[Unato]

random discussion injection. I'd like to thank the OP for the constant updates. saves me needing to poke into ign every day just to see if there's something new