Loki_344 wrote...
The chances of them patching in new animations (if that's what you were talking about and not the actual technical issues mentioned) is practically zero.Carnage752 wrote...
So far IGN reviews the story good. Shame the animations aren't better, but that's hardly ruining the game. Hope it get's patched though
SyyRaaaN wrote...
Nathan Redgrave wrote...
SyyRaaaN wrote...
Nathan Redgrave wrote...
Atakuma wrote...
K, the retail game sucks. Now we know. Rofl.
Er, no. The PS3 version has technical issues. That's all that was being said. And it's not unexpected; the PS3 version of ME2, which was supposedly running on ME3's engine, was a pretty bad port.
Er, yes. This sort of crap is 100 % unacceptable combined with the other crap they have been pulling. Huge let down.
So the PC and 360 versions automatically suck because of technical flaws on the PS3 port has.
Your logic is transcendent. I simply cannot comprehend the brilliance of it.
Lets se after the game is released, ok? I'm 100 % sure on my thing.
Modifié par bboynexus, 25 février 2012 - 03:34 .
not on mine they didn't, it all ran nicelyNathan Redgrave wrote...
DinoSteve wrote...
wait I played the demo on my 360 and ps3 and I found no technical issues with the ps3 version in fact it played better than the 360 demo, I don't understand where the complaints of ps3 framerate and lip syncing issues are coming from my demo was fine
V-sync is not lip-sync, it's something else entirely. Google it if you really want to know.
Framerates in the PS3 demo got fairly slow whenever a lot went on on-screen, which unfortunately happened whenever something big happened in the background during the Reaper invasion.
Imortalfalcon wrote...
Squallypo wrote...
ah but didnt something like that happend on ME 2? on the quarian mission ? there was a big geth stuff and you were talking with some quarrian guy and telling him to not peew pew cause he could get killed since he was injured ? in that dialog which was not auto they were pretty much pew pewing us recall that?
That was different, the player was 'zoning' into a new area of the map, geth were 3/4's a soccer field away.
Here, the guys he shot haven't even hit the floor yet, and more are literally jumping out of their space-escalades about to clown on Shep.
But I digress, either you're egging me on or just pulling my chain. Which both pretty much mean the same exact thing.
My thoughts exactly, but I wasn't 100% sure which is why I said "practically zero".Nathan Redgrave wrote...
I don't think it's possible to "patch" something like that.
DinoSteve wrote...
Nathan Redgrave wrote...
SyyRaaaN wrote...
Nathan Redgrave wrote...
Atakuma wrote...
K, the retail game sucks. Now we know. Rofl.
Er, no. The PS3 version has technical issues. That's all that was being said. And it's not unexpected; the PS3 version of ME2, which was supposedly running on ME3's engine, was a pretty bad port.
Er, yes. This sort of crap is 100 % unacceptable combined with the other crap they have been pulling. Huge let down.
So the PC and 360 versions automatically suck because of technical flaws on the PS3 port has.
Your logic is transcendent. I simply cannot comprehend the brilliance of it.
wait I played the demo on my 360 and ps3 and I found no technical issues with the ps3 version in fact it played better than the 360 demo, I don't understand where the complaints of ps3 framerate and lip syncing issues are coming from.
I must be blind because my demo was fine
Modifié par The Executioner, 25 février 2012 - 03:40 .
Redditaur wrote...
Reaper: I'm gonna getcha! Dang it.
Modifié par hex23, 25 février 2012 - 03:42 .
It is perfectly possible. Again, as long as the armored animations are good, I can ignore the unarmored ones. I just hope something is done with them.Nathan Redgrave wrote...
Loki_344 wrote...
The chances of them patching in new animations (if that's what you were talking about and not the actual technical issues mentioned) is practically zero.Carnage752 wrote...
So far IGN reviews the story good. Shame the animations aren't better, but that's hardly ruining the game. Hope it get's patched though
I don't think it's possible to "patch" something like that.
I don't think so.Nathan Redgrave wrote...
The animations look "fine," but they still look worse than they did before.
hex23 wrote...
I think the animations look fine. *shrugs*
It's funny a game like "Skyrim" has many, many flaws but people over look them because of the scope of the game. Obviously "ME3" isn't the same size as "Skyrim" but it's also not as small as something like "Uncharted 2", which has pretty flawless animation.
If I pop in the game and the animation is my biggest complaint I will not be upset.
SyyRaaaN wrote...
Nathan Redgrave wrote...
Atakuma wrote...
K, the retail game sucks. Now we know. Rofl.
Er, no. The PS3 version has technical issues. That's all that was being said. And it's not unexpected; the PS3 version of ME2, which was supposedly running on ME3's engine, was a pretty bad port.
Er, yes. This sort of crap is 100 % unacceptable combined with the other crap they have been pulling. Huge let down.
android654 wrote...
Uncharted can afford to concentrate so much on detail since that's a main selling point of the game and the linear world and scripted gameplay allow for it. Whether you love ME or not, it's hard to say the game isn't linear and scripted. So the game should be consistent with animations since there are few variations as to what will happen, when and where. Elder Scrolls and Fallout is huge, where you can spend hundreds of hours without completing the main campaign, and the numbers of variables are huge, bugs will be all over the place because they allocate their resources to adding all of those variables and a seemingly large enough world to support all of those variables.
hex23 wrote...
android654 wrote...
Uncharted can afford to concentrate so much on detail since that's a main selling point of the game and the linear world and scripted gameplay allow for it. Whether you love ME or not, it's hard to say the game isn't linear and scripted. So the game should be consistent with animations since there are few variations as to what will happen, when and where. Elder Scrolls and Fallout is huge, where you can spend hundreds of hours without completing the main campaign, and the numbers of variables are huge, bugs will be all over the place because they allocate their resources to adding all of those variables and a seemingly large enough world to support all of those variables.
Regardless of whether or not they're both linear...."Uncharted" is far more linear than the "Mass Effect" series....and much, much smaller. Also it has the added benefit of being developed for one plat form.
DJBare wrote...
OUCH!, "slaps self for looking at Mars combat video"; please put a spoiler warning in the OP thanks.
Not impressed at all by the galaxy map, was seriously hoping for a return to the cross hair point and click, the little ship moving around just seems low tech, the scanning for resources has not changed in my opinion, it's still "scanning" and we don't even get to land to find the stuff, thats going to make finding war resources just as boring as finding minerals.
Just disappointments, don't worry, pre-order not....
Modifié par someguy1231, 25 février 2012 - 03:53 .
Uh, every story driven game is scripted (duh), and how the is Mass Effect linear if there are branching paths on quests? Few variations? Your comparison isn't accurate. Uncharted single player is a 12h campaign with no branching paths and no incentive for replaybility other than difficulty. ME2 and supposedly 3 is a 30-40h campaign, where there's exploration in the galaxy, branching paths in most quests, customizable character with 6 different classes, wich give a lot of incentive for replayability other than difficulty. Elder Scrolls is much more huge, sandbox game (the bugs come with that), although they don't with cinematics. They're all very different from each other, the comparison isn't fair.android654 wrote...
hex23 wrote...
I think the animations look fine. *shrugs*
It's funny a game like "Skyrim" has many, many flaws but people over look them because of the scope of the game. Obviously "ME3" isn't the same size as "Skyrim" but it's also not as small as something like "Uncharted 2", which has pretty flawless animation.
If I pop in the game and the animation is my biggest complaint I will not be upset.
Uncharted can afford to concentrate so much on detail since that's a main selling point of the game and the linear world and scripted gameplay allow for it. Whether you love ME or not, it's hard to say the game isn't linear and scripted. So the game should be consistent with animations since there are few variations as to what will happen, when and where. Elder Scrolls and Fallout is huge, where you can spend hundreds of hours without completing the main campaign, and the numbers of variables are huge, bugs will be all over the place because they allocate their resources to adding all of those variables and a seemingly large enough world to support all of those variables.
Modifié par RyuGuitarFreak, 25 février 2012 - 03:53 .
Retour en haut
