AdmiralCheez wrote...
My point was this: If graphics really are the game's #1 stumbling point, then I don't have to worry, since I'm not a graphics nut. In fact, less intense graphics means it will run more smoothly on my junky laptop.
But I am not German.AlexXIV wrote...
Well as a fellow german countryman I support him making fun of people who call german 'barbaric'. Especially those with italian sounding names.
AdmiralCheez wrote...
The problem here is that you are already convinced ME3 will suck, so I shouldn't listen to a damn thing you say, either.Gatt9 wrote...
You only get to break review embargo if you're going to tell people it's a great game. Reviews are worthless, pre-launch reviews are external PR pieces.
AlphaJarmel wrote...
AdmiralCheez wrote...
My point was this: If graphics really are the game's #1 stumbling point, then I don't have to worry, since I'm not a graphics nut. In fact, less intense graphics means it will run more smoothly on my junky laptop.
That's some god awful reasoning. You should want the best possible graphics even if it doesn't run as smoothly. Mainly because you will get a better pc but the game in of itself won't improve.
Phaedon wrote...
But they didn't break any review embargo. It's a PC mag giving a non-final score to a PS3 version of a game they'll review on the future.
JimmyTheProthean wrote...
I'm not happy at this 15-20 hours main quest playtime hope that was just the reviewer!
because me1 is usually takes 30 hours no sidequests and Me2 normally takes me 35 hours no sidequests.
Tazzmission wrote...
its not awful. to me in order for a game to succeed is by gameplay NOT graphics.
im on xbox 360 and the game looked fine to me even if it was just the demo.
graphics arent always the number 1 selling point believe it or not
And that was the sound of House breaking his leg. Again.RyuGuitarFreak wrote...
Phaedon wrote...
IGN and Game Informer will be the first to review the game, sure. But once the embargo ends. In the meantime, IGN will be posting updates on their review progress.
AlphaJarmel wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
its not awful. to me in order for a game to succeed is by gameplay NOT graphics.
im on xbox 360 and the game looked fine to me even if it was just the demo.
graphics arent always the number 1 selling point believe it or not
We're not talking about graphics being more important than gameplay. What he's saying is that he's happy that the graphics suck just so it runs faster. That's god awful reasoning.
I am not sure. As far as I know, reviews tend to be released as early as 1 or 2 days before the release of the game.Tazzmission wrote...
Phaedon wrote...
IGN and Game Informer will be the first to review the game, sure. But once the embargo ends. In the meantime, IGN will be posting updates on their review progress.
when does the embargo end?
Phaedon wrote...
I am not sure. As far as I know, reviews tend to be released as early as 1 or 2 days before the release of the game.Tazzmission wrote...
Phaedon wrote...
IGN and Game Informer will be the first to review the game, sure. But once the embargo ends. In the meantime, IGN will be posting updates on their review progress.
when does the embargo end?
Tazzmission wrote...
yes you are. you said and i quote we should hope for the best graphics possible did you not?
to me that sounds like you make graphics more important over gameplay
Guest_xnoxiousx_*
And what exactly did he make up? The review? That's a 6 letter word, not a 4 letter one.xnoxiousx wrote...
I love how everyone here took guys word for all we know he made it up all the ****.
Phaedon wrote...
Sure, I haven't been playing a ton of games lately, but how are the graphics bad.
Again your talking about something that was done with a vehicle. The only difference is now we have a rather stealthy shuttle to bring the crew in.Aaleel wrote...
Only mission I can recall where you had to actually make your way to a compound was Zaeed's loyalty mission. Other than that it was like getting dropped off at the door before the driver went to park the car. The scenes where you would hear an announcement that a shuttle just landed at the back entrance would always make me laugh.
The Shuttle actually has stealth systems.Did these places have no scanners, radar, security of any kind? And I found no quests in ME2 inventive. Just gey dropped off, run through the linear area and get literally get picked back up at the end.
Aaleel wrote...
Oblivious wrote...
It's funny how hard Bioware works on the codex and nobody listens/reads them. In the Codex it says the Kodiak has a stealth-system built onboard alongside several other features which allow it to move undetected in enemy territory. Similar to the Normandy in fact. I can't quote it from the top of my head, but I recommend checking it out.
People have eyes. I don't care what kind of stealth system you have. You're not going to make it literally to the back door of a base, a lot of times in broad daylight.
Retour en haut