450 réponses à ce sujet

[ttchip]

FluffyScarf wrote...

Crysis 2 isn't exactly known for having good AI. There are even YT videos mocking it, especially the alien AI.

And as for Crysis 1:

Of course, that was from the demo.

It's godly compared to the ME AI. But I'll give you that: I pulled a developer out of my ass on that one [I would still argue that Far Cry was REALLY good in that aspect, especially for... uhh... 2004/2005ish.]

Modifié par ttchip, 25 février 2012 - 02:47 .

[furryrage59]

FluffyScarf wrote...

Maybe they had higher standards? The AI can now climb and aren't stumped by slightly elevated terrain like in a certain other fantasy argh-pee-gee.

Omg shut up shut up shut up.

All you've done is whine non stop about your ****ty console struggling to play skyrim. It works flawlessly on my pc so invest in something more powerful than a toaster and shut up.

Never known someone to cry so relentlessly, jesus.

Edit - deep breathing exercises.jpg

Modifié par furryrage59, 25 février 2012 - 02:48 .

[lukex38]

skyrim is so good, love it

[FluffyScarf]

Living up to your namesake there.

[furryrage59]

FluffyScarf wrote...

Living up to your namesake there.

I don't normally waste my time with trolls but my god man, stop whining.

[ttchip]

Stay on topic, guys and gals.

[FluffyScarf]

Fair enough. I'll just say 'see sig' instead.

Modifié par FluffyScarf, 25 février 2012 - 02:53 .

[Dreadwing 67]

Lol everyone bringing DA2 up....lol.

Although I do like to hear what critics want to say about ME3, I never do listen. It is usually to glean for information about a game (god knows IGN runs into problems or has issues with things I never even see), I will not take it to heart because in ME3's case, I just want reinforcement on it to show how good it is; or for the haters, how bad and CoD and DA2 and all other stuff I hear it is.

[furryrage59]

ttchip wrote...

Stay on topic, guys and gals.

Apologies

[Guldhun2]

FluffyScarf wrote...

Fair enough. I'll just say 'see sig' instead.

What's funny is that Skyrim outsold DA + DA2 combined.

[cerberus1701]

Guldhun2 wrote...

D3MON-SOVER3IGN wrote...

Alot of people in this thread seem to not understand opinions and the point of reviews. Can't say im surprised.

http://www.metacriti...c/dragon-age-ii
http://www.metacriti...3/dragon-age-ii
http://www.metacriti...0/dragon-age-ii



When the "Critic reviews" are twice as high as the user reviews something is wrong.

Really?

Like with Modern Warfare 3? Page after page of "0" user reviews? You really think it's so bad and could be so bad to any rational person that it deserves a complete "0?"

There are people that will go on Meta on the 6th and give the game a horrible score because they have to pay for the day one DLC. Or because of Andersen's walk animation.

For every 20 user reviews, ususally 2 or 3 have some valid, well-reasoned criticisms and look objectively at the game.

The rest of them look like the comment section for any Yahoo News article.

[S Atomeha]

Chewin3 wrote...

hagren wrote...

-There's an interesting sequence after the end credits

A 'flashback' of your choices and consequences would be nice.

it's big boss...

[Dreadwing 67]

Guldhun2 wrote...

FluffyScarf wrote...

Fair enough. I'll just say 'see sig' instead.

What's funny is that Skyrim outsold DA + DA2 combined.

Lol, when I read it, all I could think about was "whoopdy freakin doo" and then turn into a hater and bring up CoD d*mn it:sick:

[lukex38]

fluffyscarf, is your sig, thing below your posts referring to skyrim, if so, you should be shot in the knee....

[Crackseed]

Wulfram wrote...

Not much really new, I guess. Gameplay time seems maybe a little short, though you'd really have to know how long they took on previous ME games to make a comparison.

20 hours for a main quest is pretty solid. If you speed rush ME1 doing just main quests, the game is easily over in under 10 hours. ME2 took longer due to recruitments, etc but even it was under 20 hours main quest only.

[FluffyScarf]

So? CoD 10 or whatever was released last year sold more than DA and DA 2 combined too.

And yes it is luke.

And we're talking about those two games because some fanatics point out how Lagrim got high reviews, therefore the game is good, while if ME 3 gets similar reviews, it must mean the reviewers are not honest/legitimate/bribed.

Modifié par FluffyScarf, 25 février 2012 - 03:01 .

[AkiKishi]

The PLC wrote...

Why are you talking about Skyrim and Dragon Age 2 in a ME3 review thread?!

Because DA2 is an a game that objectively should never have had 87% from that magazine. It means take everything they say with a pinch of salt.

Example - Fantastic Animations .. read the IGN preview and it says something quite different.

[Stalker]

I have seen several GameStar reviews. They are very good reviewers overall, and it seems like they liked ME3.
Sounds great to me!

[FluffyScarf]

Example - Lagrim - Combat. Some praised it, some didn't. Didn't affect the tone or final score.

[hagren]

Catsith wrote...

I still want to know, in detail, what their complaints about the AI were, because the demo (both singleplayer and multiplayer) showed more intelligent AI than ME1 and ME2 combined.

Well, the issues were that sometimes, they stand around doing nothing, and that they still do the "Pop head in and out of cover"-shtick.

[hagren]

Dormin wrote...

This has lifted my spirits! The demo wasn't great to be honest.

The rewiever said he was let down by the demo, too, so this is a good sign

[Crackseed]

JimmyTheProthean wrote...

I'm not happy at this 15-20 hours main quest playtime hope that was just the reviewer!
because me1 is usually takes 30 hours no sidequests and Me2 normally takes me 35 hours no sidequests.

Huh? What game are you playing? If you ignore side quests ME1 is a sub-10 hour game. ME2 stretches longer on account of the mission structure, but it's still easily doable in under 20 hours w/o side missions.

30 hour ME1 is with all side missions and extra content.

[Arppis]

Mr Massakka wrote...

I have seen several GameStar reviews. They are very good reviewers overall, and it seems like they liked ME3.
Sounds great to me!

It'll be good.

[hagren]

dazbotchio wrote...

Are there any scans knocking about anywhere for this review, would like to take a look.

I have the PDF, because I'm a digital subscriber, I just don't know if I should be passing it around