Aller au contenu

Photo

Favorite Empires and Civilizations


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
144 réponses à ce sujet

#51
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages

bEVEsthda wrote...
Of course, after Cyrus,  everything went steeply downhill...  Darius, Xerxes,..  <brrr>Image IPB   ...But you gotta respect Cyrus.

C'mon now, Xerxes was alright.

Sure the Greek/Persian wars were a bit of a **** up but that was only a tiny part of his reign. His management of his empire and his building project were quite successful and by ancient standards his policies were very modern (eg, Female artisans had paid maternity leave)

#52
Major League

Major League
  • Members
  • 220 messages

Wentletrap wrote...

Wow, a lot of Byzantine lovers in this thread.


The Byzantines have always fascinated me too, for their art and architecture, their long history, and their bridging of east / west and Christianity / Islam.


I’ve only read about them on wikipedia while at work, does anyone have any books to recommend?


There’s a lot of sad and colorful little stories sprinkled throughout their history, too.  A bunch seem to involve blinding... eww.  Glad I didn’t live in medieval times.


- In 1014, Basil II had 15,000 Bulgars blinded after defeating them in battle.  Every 100th man was spared an eye, so he could help lead his comrades back home.  The Bulgarian king Samuel supposedly had a heart attack upon seeing his blinded army and died a day or two later.


- after defeating the Byzantines at Manzikert, Alp Arslan asked the captured Byzantine Emperor:

Alp Arslan: "What would you do if *I* were brought before *you* as a prisoner?"

Romanos: "Perhaps I'd kill you, or exhibit you in the streets of Constantinople."

Alp Arslan: "My punishment is far heavier. I forgive you, and set you free."

And of course, upon returning home, Romanos was deposed and blinded by his Byzantine subjects and died shortly after.


- A later emperor, John IV Laskaris, was deposed and blinded at the age of eleven by a rival for the throne.  (Poor kid).  The son of said rival visited him thirty years later at a monastery to ask for forgiveness, which he gave.


- The last Byzantine emperor, Constantine Palaiologos, died fighting at the Siege of Constantine in 1453.  He cast off his purple cloak, and jumped into the crowd to fight amongst his men, and was never seen again.  How sadly romantic!


- When Mehmet II conquered Constantinople for the Turks in 1453, he was all of 21 years old.  Before he entered the Hagia Sophia church, he sprinkled some dirt from the ground upon his turban as a show of respect.   (but then, he went ahead and destroyed the Church of the Holy Apostles, resting place of the Byzantine Emperors since Constantine, :(.  How amazing it would be if we could visit that church today...)  


Also, the poem Sailing to Byzantium, by Yeats, is awesome.


you should look up Heraculius.  probably the most baddass warrior emperor ever lol

yea, the last Byzantine Emperor was a sad tale.  I know a Greek legend, is that since they didnt find Constatine's body, that a angel snatched him up to heaven and one day he will return to defeat the turks.  I thought it was a interesting legend.  I think that is right.

I know Basil, blinded those men for a earlier transgression, and the death of his favorite general. 

#53
Major League

Major League
  • Members
  • 220 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Major League wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

- Ancient Semitic civilizations like Akkadians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Phoenicians / Carthaginians, Canaanites, Israelites, Sabaeans....etc
- The Roman Empire (+ Byzantium)
- Early Islamic Caliphates: Prophet Muhammad's state, Rashidun Caliphate, Umayyad Caliphate (+ Umayyads in Spain), Abbasid Caliphate (including fragmentation era) and Fatimid Caliphate.
- Ottoman Empire
- Japan in the pre-Tokugawa era and during The Meiji Restoration.
- Early modern and modern Europe (15-16th century till 20th).


to bad the Romans really were thorough and destroying the Carthiginians.  I'd like to learn more about them.


Fun facts:

Carthage's real Phoenician name was "Qart Hadash." Anyone who knows Hebrew and / or Arabic would now that this means "New Town."

Hannibal's family name was Barca. "Barca" means lighting, similar to the Arabic word barq برق.


funny, because I've been reading some pro Hannibal sources that he was actually a honorable general, and buried dead Roman generals.  I believe this, because we all know how biased the Romans were lol

#54
Kaiser Arian XVII

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 286 messages

GodWood wrote...

bEVEsthda wrote...
Of course, after Cyrus,  everything went steeply downhill...  Darius, Xerxes,..  <brrr>Image IPB   ...But you gotta respect Cyrus.

C'mon now, Xerxes was alright.

Sure the Greek/Persian wars were a bit of a **** up but that was only a tiny part of his reign. His management of his empire and his building project were quite successful and by ancient standards his policies were very modern (eg, Female artisans had paid maternity leave)


Almost true. He was better than average roman emperors btw. The Army of Persia wasn't even strong, The empire worked with diplomacy and bureaucracy.
Still the Empire had good emperors like Artaxerxes I, III and Darius III.

Modifié par Jedi Sentinel Arian, 26 février 2012 - 05:19 .


#55
ObserverStatus

ObserverStatus
  • Members
  • 19 046 messages
 America (f*** yeah!)

Modifié par bobobo878, 26 février 2012 - 05:25 .


#56
Flashflame58

Flashflame58
  • Members
  • 901 messages
The HiddenKINGdom. :I

#57
Clover Rider

Clover Rider
  • Members
  • 9 436 messages

bobobo878 wrote...

 America (f*** yeah!)

Yup, America is the best.

Modifié par Some Geth, 26 février 2012 - 05:29 .


#58
Darthnemesis2

Darthnemesis2
  • Members
  • 3 919 messages
The HiddenKINGdom.

#59
HiddenKING

HiddenKING
  • Members
  • 2 135 messages
The HiddenKINGdom.

#60
The Minority

The Minority
  • Members
  • 943 messages
The HiddenKINGdom.

But the HiddenKING is just a figurehead. LuvPoison is really in charge.

#61
Ghost Lightning

Ghost Lightning
  • Members
  • 10 303 messages

HiddenKING wrote...

The HiddenKINGdom.


wut he sed

#62
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages
The Secret Canadian Empire.

#63
Major League

Major League
  • Members
  • 220 messages

Jedi Sentinel Arian wrote...

GodWood wrote...

bEVEsthda wrote...
Of course, after Cyrus,  everything went steeply downhill...  Darius, Xerxes,..  <brrr>Image IPB   ...But you gotta respect Cyrus.

C'mon now, Xerxes was alright.

Sure the Greek/Persian wars were a bit of a **** up but that was only a tiny part of his reign. His management of his empire and his building project were quite successful and by ancient standards his policies were very modern (eg, Female artisans had paid maternity leave)


Almost true. He was better than average roman emperors btw. The Army of Persia wasn't even strong, The empire worked with diplomacy and bureaucracy.
Still the Empire had good emperors like Artaxerxes I, III and Darius III.


atm, i dont think civilizations were strong enough to run large empires.

#64
bandfred

bandfred
  • Members
  • 361 messages
Eastern Roman Empire/Byzantines

Moghul Empire - would highly recommend the Empire of the Moghul series.

Early Anglo-Saxon

Modifié par bandfred, 26 février 2012 - 06:49 .


#65
Some Dude

Some Dude
  • Members
  • 1 298 messages
Not seeing as much Mongol love as I would have thought..... Come on, who would have thought an army of nomadic horsemen would create the largest empire ever?
Also Byzantine support +1

#66
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages
The Mongols are interesting to me but their empire shrunk almost as quickly as it expanded so they don't really rate too high in the empire deathmatch. The Huns did as well as them and they were nomadic horsemen, too.

I'm mostly interested in the vanished empires few have heard of- the Aryans, Avars, Ostrogoths. They are finding sites now in Russia for the first time that point to a civilization that could have rivaled the Mediterranean empires. The Soviets didn't allow aerial photography so they've only just spotted them in recent years and they've not been excavated yet.

Modifié par Addai67, 26 février 2012 - 10:51 .


#67
Wentletrap

Wentletrap
  • Members
  • 659 messages

Addai67 wrote...

I'm mostly interested in the vanished empires few have heard of- the Aryans, Avars, Ostrogoths.



On that note, here's the book I'm reading now - about the vanished native american civilzations before Columbus, and how advanced they may once have been. 

#68
bEVEsthda

bEVEsthda
  • Members
  • 3 612 messages

GodWood wrote...

bEVEsthda wrote...
Of course, after Cyrus,  everything went steeply downhill...  Darius, Xerxes,..  <brrr>Image IPB   ...But you gotta respect Cyrus.

C'mon now, Xerxes was alright.

Sure the Greek/Persian wars were a bit of a **** up but that was only a tiny part of his reign. His management of his empire and his building project were quite successful and by ancient standards his policies were very modern (eg, Female artisans had paid maternity leave)


Main effort of Xerxes reign was to mobilize a huge army to conquer Greeze. For this he taxed the **** out of the empire. When one of his vassals, Pythius, the one who had contributed most to the war, asked for his son to be exempted from the march on Greeze, Xerxes granted the request by having the son split lengthwise, put the parts on stakes and let the army march between the halves when they departed.

When the first floating bridges across the Hellespont were destroyed in storms, Xerxes had the engineers executed and ordered the water of Hellespont to be whipped as punishement.

After the disastrous defeat at Salamis, Xerxes had survivors from his destroyed fleet executed.

After the further disastrous defeats at Plataea and Mycale, war lost, Xerxes then tried to recover his pride and grandeur by building these megalomaniac, imposing construction projects you mention. Eventually, he and his eldest son were murdered in a maze of intrigues that eventually saw Artaxerxes as the new king.

Xerxes father, Darius, was a cruel ruler, but he was a skillful administrator and empire builder/manager. Xerxes just inherited all this. No doubt he was groomed into the role as an emperor by his father, but there's no evidence of any personal greatness or competence in Xerxes. Yes, maybe the war was just an immature display of early arrogance and ignorance. He was cruel and very full of himself. And maybe he recoved to become a more sensible ruler after. But did he accomplish anything but ruin for the empire, besides those expensive, self-glorifying buildings? Xerxes still gets a thumb-down from me.

Modifié par bEVEsthda, 26 février 2012 - 12:10 .


#69
Major League

Major League
  • Members
  • 220 messages

bEVEsthda wrote...

GodWood wrote...

bEVEsthda wrote...
Of course, after Cyrus,  everything went steeply downhill...  Darius, Xerxes,..  <brrr>Image IPB   ...But you gotta respect Cyrus.

C'mon now, Xerxes was alright.

Sure the Greek/Persian wars were a bit of a **** up but that was only a tiny part of his reign. His management of his empire and his building project were quite successful and by ancient standards his policies were very modern (eg, Female artisans had paid maternity leave)


Main effort of Xerxes reign was to mobilize a huge army to conquer Greeze. For this he taxed the **** out of the empire. When one of his vassals, Pythius, the one who had contributed most to the war, asked for his son to be exempted from the march on Greeze, Xerxes granted the request by having the son split lengthwise, put the parts on stakes and let the army march between the halves when they departed.

When the first floating bridges across the Hellespont were destroyed in storms, Xerxes had the engineers executed and ordered the water of Hellespont to be whipped as punishement.

After the disastrous defeat at Salamis, Xerxes had survivors from his destroyed fleet executed.

After the further disastrous defeats at Plataea and Mycale, war lost, Xerxes then tried to recover his pride and grandeur by building these megalomaniac, imposing construction projects you mention. Eventually, he and his eldest son were murdered in a maze of intrigues that eventually saw Artaxerxes as the new king.

Xerxes father, Darius, was a cruel ruler, but he was a skillful administrator and empire builder/manager. Xerxes just inherited all this. No doubt he was groomed into the role as an emperor by his father, but there's no evidence of any personal greatness or competence in Xerxes. Yes, maybe the war was just an immature display of early arrogance and ignorance. He was cruel and very full of himself. And maybe he recoved to become a more sensible ruler after. But did he accomplish anything but ruin for the empire, besides those expensive, self-glorifying buildings? Xerxes still gets a thumb-down from me.


my knowledge on the Persian Empire is from the Greeks.  Never really studied Persia, but I had respect for Darius and his religious tolerance.  All sources I've read agrees Xerxes was terrible.  The Persians treated their army as expendable cannon fodder, and their soldiers barely had any armor.  While the Greeks did armor their soldiers.  At Thermopalye (spelled that wrong) it is said for every dead Spartan, he took 20 with him.  The Persians just threw bodies at oppenents, and used no tactics.

#70
Major League

Major League
  • Members
  • 220 messages

Addai67 wrote...

The Mongols are interesting to me but their empire shrunk almost as quickly as it expanded so they don't really rate too high in the empire deathmatch. The Huns did as well as them and they were nomadic horsemen, too.

I'm mostly interested in the vanished empires few have heard of- the Aryans, Avars, Ostrogoths. They are finding sites now in Russia for the first time that point to a civilization that could have rivaled the Mediterranean empires. The Soviets didn't allow aerial photography so they've only just spotted them in recent years and they've not been excavated yet.


I find the Mongols interesting, in that they would recruit from conquered peoples what they didnt have.  For exanple, they didnt have siege weapons, so they took some Chinese engineers.  I also find them interesting because they linked Asia with Europe.  The Silk Road was actually safe to travel. 

The Huns never tried to set up a Empire, they were nomadic and they wanted to stay that way.  I think that is the big difference between them and the Mongols.

Vanished empires in Russia?....interesting.  Could it be linked to Scythia?

#71
Kaiser Arian XVII

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 286 messages

Major League wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

The Mongols are interesting to me but their empire shrunk almost as quickly as it expanded so they don't really rate too high in the empire deathmatch. The Huns did as well as them and they were nomadic horsemen, too.

I'm mostly interested in the vanished empires few have heard of- the Aryans, Avars, Ostrogoths. They are finding sites now in Russia for the first time that point to a civilization that could have rivaled the Mediterranean empires. The Soviets didn't allow aerial photography so they've only just spotted them in recent years and they've not been excavated yet.


I find the Mongols interesting, in that they would recruit from conquered peoples what they didnt have.  For exanple, they didnt have siege weapons, so they took some Chinese engineers.  I also find them interesting because they linked Asia with Europe.  The Silk Road was actually safe to travel. 

The Huns never tried to set up a Empire, they were nomadic and they wanted to stay that way.  I think that is the big difference between them and the Mongols.

Vanished empires in Russia?....interesting.  Could it be linked to Scythia?


I don't find them interesting. They were just savage barbarians who massacred Chinese, Persians, Arabs, Russians and many other folks.
And I dislike their religion and 'totem' and 'taboo' terms.

#72
DarkDragon777

DarkDragon777
  • Members
  • 1 956 messages

Addai67 wrote...


I'm mostly interested in the vanished empires few have heard of- the Aryans, Avars, Ostrogoths. They are finding sites now in Russia for the first time that point to a civilization that could have rivaled the Mediterranean empires. The Soviets didn't allow aerial photography so they've only just spotted them in recent years and they've not been excavated yet.


Yeah, I don't think so The found one large city, but that's it.

#73
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Jedi Sentinel Arian wrote...
I don't find them interesting. They were just savage barbarians who massacred Chinese, Persians, Arabs, Russians and many other folks.
And I dislike their religion and 'totem' and 'taboo' terms.

LOL  Dude, everyone you listed massacred someone at some point.

The Shang dynasty in China had a religious and poltiical system based on human sacrifice.  There have been excavations that showed 600 people and hundreds of animals were sacrificed to consecrate a single house.  Now that is what I call barbaric.

Modifié par Addai67, 26 février 2012 - 07:35 .


#74
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

DarkDragon777 wrote...

Addai67 wrote...


I'm mostly interested in the vanished empires few have heard of- the Aryans, Avars, Ostrogoths. They are finding sites now in Russia for the first time that point to a civilization that could have rivaled the Mediterranean empires. The Soviets didn't allow aerial photography so they've only just spotted them in recent years and they've not been excavated yet.


Yeah, I don't think so The found one large city, but that's it.

Here's an article on it.

#75
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Jedi Sentinel Arian wrote...
I don't find them interesting. They were just savage barbarians who massacred Chinese, Persians, Arabs, Russians and many other folks.
And I dislike their religion and 'totem' and 'taboo' terms.

LOL  Dude, everyone you listed massacred someone at some point.


Not all of them massacred to the same extent.
And more importantly, the Mongols didn't replace what they destroyed.

Ultimately, 3 of their 4 empires converted to Islam and were absorbed by the clearly more advanced culture.