teh_619 wrote...
AlanC9 wrote...
teh_619 wrote...
AlanC9 wrote...
teh_619 wrote...
You're in space. There's nothing else you need. When you're in space, you explore and/or you have fights in it DAMN IT
An actual argument would be nice here. All you've been saying is ITS SPACE DAMMIT SPACE AND IF ITS A SPACE GAME ITS SUPPOSED TO HAVE SPACE EXPLORATION WHY AREN'T YOU LISTENING TO ME!!!!
Welcome to the series.
May I inform you that we had space exploration on ME1.
Alright bye.
Yep. We did. I thought it was a bad idea in ME1, and said so at the time. ME2 and ME3 are doing better by at least trying to give RP reasons to do the exploration.
Still looking for that argument.
Argument for what?
The "argument" YOU make is that they removed it because it was implemented poorly.
Argument? I thought that was just a fact. I mean, it'd be nice if Bio agreed with me that planet exploration should never have even been attempted in ME1, but I agree that it was probably only removed because it turned out to be boring. Anyway, I don't particularly care why Bio imporved exploration in ME2, only that they did.
I'm saying I want it back and improved.
For me, removing it
is an improvement. Shepard's got a job to do, and that job has nothing to do with driving around barren planets mining useless minerals and scavenging crashed space probes.
ME3 seems to be keeping everything that was good about ME exploration while dropping all the bad parts.
You disagree. So make a case. Why
should Shepard be driving around barren planets mining useless minerals and scavenging crashed space probes?
Modifié par AlanC9, 26 février 2012 - 09:46 .