RunCDFirst wrote...
Yes, everyone knows that you hate Loghain. I don't think it's too much to ask for you to keep the discussions civil though, and leave personal attacks out of this.
It was more ironic than agressive.
But my point was that it is irksome to see any "evil" action in the game being labeled as "doing that is necessary", even when there was much better option that were more on the good side, or that the evil action is obviously counter-productive.
As such, it seems that it's the new "cool" to take an evil action and pretend it's "ruthlessness for a greater good", even when it only ends up being a failure even in efficiency.
So I'd like to remind people : the "pragmatic, ruthless" approach isn't "when faced with two options, take the eviler because it looks like you're a Man by doing it", it's "take the best one".
Loghain's choices don't strike me as pragmatic, they strike me as idiotic, even from his insane point of view.
If you are afraid of some foreign invasion, and you have something that is at the very least a big darkspawn raid on your territory, YOU DON'T DESTROY YOUR OWN ARMY AND START A CIVIL WAR !
Loghain being a traitor that manage to kills his king during the battle (but actually ACTS during the battle rather than retreat) and "mourn" such "tragic accident"? That's great ! Ruthless, but pragmatic and efficient.
Loghain abandonning some towns to the invaders/darkspawns rather than defending it because it would damage his military forces ? That's okay ! Ruthless, but pragmatic and efficient.
Loghain using the elves as slave labor to built the fortifications/weapons necessary ? No problem ! Ruthless, but pragmatic and efficient.
Loghain requisitionning food and ressources for the army even if it lets lots of peasants to starve, because the army ACTUALLY lacks food and ressources ? Good move ! Ruthless, but pragmatic and efficient.
All this could have made more understandable and more acceptable the "misguided but with honorable intentions". Bonus point if his actions would have been actually NECESSARY to resist the darkspawn invasion. Here there would have been some real reason to forgive him, some real reason to consider that he did what he to do, and to make it harder to treat him simply as a bastard.
But what we see in the game ? Seriously, that's not that. He takes evil actions but without them having a real gain over actual honourable actions. He goes much farther than needed, and ends usually up with completely counter-productive results. That's not "ruthless, but pragmatic and efficient", no.