Butthead11 wrote...
movieguyabw wrote...
Butthead11 wrote...
Who said shepard is the male ideal to everyone?
Now I'm starting to feel convinced that you're trolling.
i'm convinced you can't see others viewpoints and when someone disagrees with you, you pull the troll card.
I
don't think male shepard is my ideal body type or personality. but i'm
sure some do, and bioware can't make everyone happy. to imply that all
women think femshep is a bad example of a hero is silly.
*sigh*
If
you really needed clarification that not everyone shared the same
ideal, then I don't know what to say. To imply that I implied that
*all* women will think the same exact way about a character is
erroneous, and small minded.
My point was never about how
*everyone* will view the characters the same exact way, but it was about
what they were supposed to represent.
The ancient greeks had a
theory that if the height of your head compared to the length of your
arm was a specific ratio, that you had the "perfect" body.
This
was their ideal. It doesn't mean that everyone subscribed to it. Just
as the popular male ideal is smart, sophisticated, rich, has a muscular
build like Shepard, and can get any woman he wants. Does that mean
every guy wants to be the same exact thing? No. That's kindergardener
stuff; I thought this discussion was beyond such simple truths as
"everyone is different". Which is why I thought you were trolling.
When
creating a protagonist for a story, the idea is to create a character
that the audience can relate to, and someone they would want to be.
When you ask someone suffering from an eating disorder such as anorexia,
to associate with a character who looks like:

and it *triggers* them, that's not a very good sign. A quick search on anorexia statistics yields this:
"• Up to 24 million people of all ages and genders suffer from an eating
disorder (anorexia, bulimia and binge eating disorder) in the U.S.3"
Now, I'm not saying every single one of them is a potential customer, or would be affected by this. But if the game still hasn't come out yet and we're getting some adverse reactions to this, it's something to look into. And if it is a case where many are having similar negative reactions, then that's a large chunk of a potential audience you're either alienating, harming, or otherwise missing out on. To say "Oh, well you still have Garrus, and you don't have to take your clothes off" is just wrong. It's saying it's alright to deprive people of a part of a game simply because of a sickness that in most cases is beyond their control.