Arppis wrote...

Roman
Centurians/bigshots had ROID armors! Plus, I just think that some
people might have bigger chests, and having hard armor press against
them might be bad. I'm not 100% defending it, but it would just make
women with bigger breasts impossible to wear.
But maybe they could resolve it in some other way... 
Apart from the fact that this is nowhere near the ridiculousness of boob armor, you can bet Jupiter's **** that those jolly Romans had some sort of padding under that chest plate, they would not be wearing that stuff skintight.
Regarding the people with bigger breasts, they would have to try to compensate with extra padding. But I can guarantee that some discomfort is preferable to the kind of injuries boob armor could produce.
TS2Aggie wrote...
Yeah, wouldn't boob armor actually be more likely to direct a melee weapon directly into her chest (right between the breasts) instead of deflecting it away from her?
Indeed, that is one of the potential dangers.
The Woldan wrote...
Good post.
We actually have better
non-boob functional armor in the game, the Cerberus Assault Armor for
example does not have boob shaped structural weaknesses on the chest
piece.[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/smile.png[/smilie]
Cerberus scientists knew what they were doing when designing that armor.
Thank you.
I am in fact quite thankful that FemShep gets a pretty decent selection of sensible armor in the game, even if her iconic look includes boob armor.