Pretty much this. The only things ME1 had over ME2 were varied environments, a more engaging storyline, more (but not necessarily better) vehicle exploration, a better persuasion system, and more squadmate dialogue. Oh, and the awesome loading screens.SomeKindaEnigma wrote...
ME2 topped it. In my humble opinion.
![=]](https://lvlt.forum.bioware.com/public/style_emoticons/default/sideways.png)
easygame88 wrote...
Draconis6666 wrote...
This is the entire point though, there is no challenge to the combat in ME 1.
You can either sit and let everythign come to you and kill them 1 by 1,
or just use biotics to which everything in the game is rediculously weak
or you can just be a soldier shock trooper and use immunity spam to be unkillable on any difficulty but Insanity, and even then you can only die to rockets.
but beyond that you dont even need immunity spam because you can just run to the left and half the enemies wont hit you anyway because of the terrible targeting system. Same way you can park just the front end of the mako behind a rock with 90% of it sticking out and never take any damage because they all shoot at the rock.
We won't even talk about singularity....
But let's be honest here. ME2 wasn't difficult either. ****, even I can beat it on Insanity without much difficulty.
ME3 seems to be a lot tougher though.
N7Infernox wrote...
The only things ME1 had over ME2 were varied environments, a more engaging storyline, more (but not necessarily better) vehicle exploration, a better persuasion system, and more squadmate dialogue.
didymos1120 wrote...
N7Infernox wrote...
The only things ME1 had over ME2 were varied environments, a more engaging storyline, more (but not necessarily better) vehicle exploration, a better persuasion system, and more squadmate dialogue.
Uh, that last one is just plain not true. Like, not even close to true.
E-Type XR wrote...
They already have.
It was called ME2.
Revan312 wrote...
Gameplay, and strictly gameplay i.e. the actual mechanics of shooting, were much improved in ME2, though the customization was gutted so that all dozen weapons felt more unique..
Story wise, which is why I even play RPG's as the mechanics in ANY Bioware game leave something to be desired, was faaar better in ME1, simply because it wasn't written like a Michael Bay film.. ME2 felt like Bad Boys 2 in space with all the ridiculous over the top lines and dialogue deliveries that come with it.
The main enemy was much better in ME1.
The main arc and story was much better in ME1
The actual feel of the universe imo was better in ME1 (more clinical and subdued- personal preference in sci-fi)
The plot wasn't so "humans are teh best" centered in ME1.
Finally, the work involved from locations, backgrounds and animations were all better in ME1 imo.
ME2 had better combat, a slew of 'gotta please em all, gotta please em all' missions for your crew and a terrible ending.. *shrug* I'm with the OP..
indeed.OMGOSHNESS wrote...
E-Type XR wrote...
They already have.
It was called ME2.
Modifié par mauro2222, 28 février 2012 - 11:28 .
Modifié par tez19, 29 février 2012 - 12:31 .
tez19 wrote...
Lol whoever thinks ME2 is better than ME1 is exactly the type of 'gamer' Bioware is catering towards now. These casual's wouldn't know a good game if it smacked their follow the crowd sheep mentality in the face.
They are not real gamer's, and all that is wrong with the gaming community.
mauro2222 wrote...
...and the biotics lol, they made me fly across the room.
tez19 wrote...
Lol whoever thinks ME2 is better than ME1 is exactly the type of 'gamer' Bioware is catering towards now. These casual's wouldn't know a good game if it smacked their follow the crowd sheep mentality in the face.
They are not real gamer's, and they are all that is wrong with the gaming community.
You are not a real gamer, you are what is referred to as a 'casual'. Let Bioware milk you casual, you are not a true gamer.OMGOSHNESS wrote...
tez19 wrote...
Lol whoever thinks ME2 is better than ME1 is exactly the type of 'gamer' Bioware is catering towards now. These casual's wouldn't know a good game if it smacked their follow the crowd sheep mentality in the face.
They are not real gamer's, and they are all that is wrong with the gaming community.
ME2 has far better gameplay and ME1 is better in most of the other aspects. I ultimately play games to have fun though, and I can't stand 1's combat.
Go ahead, don't think of me as a real gamer, but I ENJOYED 2 more and like it more as a result. Deal with it.
tez19 wrote...
You are not a real gamer, you are what is referred to as a 'casual'. Let Bioware milk you casual, you are not a true gamer.OMGOSHNESS wrote...
tez19 wrote...
Lol whoever thinks ME2 is better than ME1 is exactly the type of 'gamer' Bioware is catering towards now. These casual's wouldn't know a good game if it smacked their follow the crowd sheep mentality in the face.
They are not real gamer's, and they are all that is wrong with the gaming community.
ME2 has far better gameplay and ME1 is better in most of the other aspects. I ultimately play games to have fun though, and I can't stand 1's combat.
Go ahead, don't think of me as a real gamer, but I ENJOYED 2 more and like it more as a result. Deal with it.
didymos1120 wrote...
tez19 wrote...
Lol whoever thinks ME2 is better than ME1 is exactly the type of 'gamer' Bioware is catering towards now. These casual's wouldn't know a good game if it smacked their follow the crowd sheep mentality in the face.
They are not real gamer's, and all that is wrong with the gaming community.
I'm not sure which would be more pitiable: if you're actually sincere about that nonsense or just trolling.
Sorry; by varied environments, I meant "combat environments that didn't always involve traveling in a relatively straight line, over generic cover". And maybe it just seems to me that there's more dialogue in the first game b/c I haven't played it as much as the second. In ME2, I know almost all of the points where characters chip in on missions-- usually with responses that have little deviation between different characters. Also, unless you're romancing a character, dialogues with characters kind of cut off after their loyalty missions (only exception I can think of is Mordin, i think). In ME1, characters would leave personal quips about the surroundings you were in, whenever prompted (aside from combat). Individuals would also seem to have more to say on the Normandy after/ in between missions (i.e. Wrex). So maybe there was more cumulative and cinematic dialogue in ME2, but ME1 made me feel like individual characters were more fleshed out. Just my 2centsDraconis6666 wrote...
didymos1120 wrote...
N7Infernox wrote...
The only things ME1 had over ME2 were varied environments, a more engaging storyline, more (but not necessarily better) vehicle exploration, a better persuasion system, and more squadmate dialogue.
Uh, that last one is just plain not true. Like, not even close to true.
Neither is the first one, proceduraly generated terrain and cookie cutter prefab buildings used over and over is not varied environments.
And here we have Bioware's new target market, absolute casuals who want every game to be like COD. Do you even know any lore about the ME universe. You are not a real gamer.TheItalianSnip3r wrote...
It has been proven that you can top it. Its called ME2. The gunplay in ME1 was terrible. Mass Effect 2 was a flatout better game
tez19 wrote...
Lol whoever thinks ME2 is better than ME1 is exactly the type of 'gamer' Bioware is catering towards now. These casual's wouldn't know a good game if it smacked their follow the crowd sheep mentality in the face.
They are not real gamer's, and they are all that is wrong with the gaming community.
Neither are you.tez19 wrote...
And here we have Bioware's new target market, absolute casuals who want every game to be like COD. Do you even know any lore about the ME universe. You are not a real gamer.TheItalianSnip3r wrote...
It has been proven that you can top it. Its called ME2. The gunplay in ME1 was terrible. Mass Effect 2 was a flatout better game
Retour en haut
