magnuskn wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
To be or not to be.
It has more context then you thing. Ask your self this.....Why bother trying to live if you just going to end up dead any way?
Life is about living even if it is going to end bitterly. It's about the fight and the passion, not the oh so sweet happy ending because that's a lie...There are no happy endings....Just endings and new beginings.
Hell, I even made Shapard with that philosophy and a Shepard that want to die but lives because of a perpose.
To be up set that it end this way is to ignore the point they are trying to make.
First off, this is a game, not real life. So this existential question of "to be or not to be" does apply only tangentially.
Secondly, if I can only look forward to another flavor of failure ( and boy, do all the endings look like failure in one form or another ), why shouldn't I half-ass it, instead of giving it my all?
It really seems like BioWare went with the "Hey, we already got their money!" mentality, instead of thinking what this could do to their fan-base long-term. It's as if they don't even care anymore about their reputation.
I'm not sure how any of the endings are a flavor of failure. Either way the Reapers are gone, and Galactic Life resumes.
And go ahead, half-ass it, don't give it your all. And watch you lose it all instead of a few.
keep saying "this is a game it's not real", that's not the point yes it is a game, a game about war, death, destruction, suffereing, genocide, murder, theft, but it's also about, life, love, happiness, and all that good stuff. and all that good stuff you get......just not at the end.
The end isn't about Shepard, it's about the Big picture. The Galaxy and the lives that are still in it. That is what Bioware has been trying to put across since ME1, they only used Shepard because they wanted to tell the story through his eyes, what he experienced, what he did and who he was, his choices that he had to make.