I get uneasy when I see discussions about legal action. I understand the sentiment, believe me, but it's not likely they would be taken well by our hosts. I don't know about other countries, but in the US, software license agreements lock everything down pretty tight. When you install and run software, you basically agree to accept it as-is. Doesn't matter how it was represented in advertising, how it performs, how buggy it is, anything. Most people click through these agreements without reading them, but they pretty much say that you agree to hold the vendor completely blameless no matter what happens when those bits hit the CPU.
Consumer protection statutes in the US offer some broad rights, but not much more than repair/refund if defective and the right to publicly disclose product problems / issues without fear of prosecution or punitive action. At least that's my understanding, but I'm not an attorney.
Like I said, I understand the frustration and I'm not trying to be critical. Just suggesting that litigious behavior seems risky when we're asking a vendor to do something they don't have to do.
G'night all.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





