Hah. Strangely fitting.Lord Costantino wrote...
I believe this needs to be heard again.
Hackett ftw
We'll hold the line, Admiral
Hah. Strangely fitting.Lord Costantino wrote...
I believe this needs to be heard again.
Hackett ftw
Goodwood wrote...
Sl4sh3r wrote...
One thing I wanted to add to the...
"Things I don't like about ME3 besides the ending" category...
THE DAMN 'PUSH RELEASE' PLASTIC THING HOLDING THE DISCS IN THE BOX.
They are by far the most annoying 'push release' buttons out of any case I've ever seen.
I wouldn't know. I have a digital copy.
Nharia1 wrote...
Lord Costantino wrote...
Lady_Aescwyn wrote...
*long, tired sigh*
I've been watching and occasionally commenting on this thread since a few days before launch, but a part of me has been in denial this whole time. Hoping that it's all just a big misunderstanding or something... I don't even know. Well... I just finished the game and saw the endings with my own eyes...
I knew... I knew what would happen... But still... It hit me hard. I tried to rationalize it and failed. I don't even know why I'm so goddamn worked up over a VIDEO GAME!
I don't know... I'm just tired... And sad.
No anger.
Just the tiniest spark of determination.
We. Will. Fix. This.
Hold the line.
We will hold this line until we see the sun break the dawn!
At dawn on the third day. Look to the east.Sorry had to throw that in there.
Fulgrim88 wrote...
Hah. Strangely fitting.Lord Costantino wrote...
I believe this needs to be heard again.
Hackett ftw
We'll hold the line, Admiral
Goodwood wrote...
Liara T'Soni would've wanted me to hold the line, so I'm holding it.

Modifié par Militarized, 17 mars 2012 - 07:53 .
Modifié par ld1449, 17 mars 2012 - 07:55 .
Goodwood wrote...
Nharia1 wrote...
Goodwood wrote...
The Killer Angels is a novel, the second in a trilogy by Michael and Jeffrey Shaara (father and son—Mike died after completing one of the novels and Jeff finished the other two from notes). I have two reference books about the Civil War, Brother Against Brother published by Time Life, and the venerable Campfire and Battlefield, which was first published in the 1880s. While the latter is a little light on details, they both agree that the action was not premeditated.
Doesn't diminish what the regiment and its commander accomplished, though.
Agreed! Best damn thing that happend for the Union that battle besides them winning it.
Don't tempt me...
I'm a Civil War, World War II and general military history nut, and any discussion between us would probably go on for hours and derail this thread...
Hicks 84 wrote...
Hello friends how goes the fight?
It reads more like he did not know what to say but had to get the article up anyway.Mass Effect 3 and the entire series stand alongside Uncharted and Skyrim in exemplifying what games can do that cannot be replicated in other creative forms. What is so unique in this game is how the presence of its conclusion feels like the existential dread that infuses the characters that make up its universe. The paradox of the game becomes painfully prescient as it draws inexorably towards its conclusion. Here, Shepard is trying to determining the fate of everything but the inevitability of the final is inescapable. All the decisions you continue to make in Mass Effect may be less consequential but they feel all the more grave as if the game is becoming a testament to who you are, or who you want to be.
tenojitsu wrote...
Hey guys. People seem to be responding to the following thread favorably. What do you guys think?
http://social.biowar...ndex/10102827/1
Hold the line!
Harthouse wrote...
I fully accept your apology, and thank you very much for such a display of class, it's truly rare in the internet age.
While I continue to disagree with you in principle, you've made good and fair points here that in essence I cannot disagree with, most of the larger gaming media sites have, for whatever reasons, dimissed or derided the Retake campaign's activities.
I do think that the PR battle is not quite over, and while I will to the end of my days despise Colin Moriarty and others of his ilk, for me the focus has always been on getting Bioware's attention and trying to get a change. I'll keep trying simply because I've too many times in my life not done anything, experienced no change, and really couldn't complain since I'd done nothing. This time, win lose or draw, at least I did something.
Still, I thank you very much for the respectful discussion.
Modifié par pikey1969, 17 mars 2012 - 08:06 .
Militarized wrote...
This is what I got from the PR letter. At least it fits with the endings logic.
Maybe I'm bad at this meme thing.
xHezz90 wrote...
I have a question....am I personally just too dumb to understand the ending or am I right and the ending makes no sense? I'm sorry for getting confused but all the naysayers seem to be getting to me.
xHezz90 wrote...
I have a question....am I personally just too dumb to understand the ending or am I right and the ending makes no sense? I'm sorry for getting confused but all the naysayers seem to be getting to me.
Lord Costantino wrote...
Nharia1 wrote...
Lord Costantino wrote...
Lady_Aescwyn wrote...
*long, tired sigh*
I've been watching and occasionally commenting on this thread since a few days before launch, but a part of me has been in denial this whole time. Hoping that it's all just a big misunderstanding or something... I don't even know. Well... I just finished the game and saw the endings with my own eyes...
I knew... I knew what would happen... But still... It hit me hard. I tried to rationalize it and failed. I don't even know why I'm so goddamn worked up over a VIDEO GAME!
I don't know... I'm just tired... And sad.
No anger.
Just the tiniest spark of determination.
We. Will. Fix. This.
Hold the line.
We will hold this line until we see the sun break the dawn!
At dawn on the third day. Look to the east.Sorry had to throw that in there.
...My mind exploded with epicness
xHezz90 wrote...
I have a question....am I personally just too dumb to understand the ending or am I right and the ending makes no sense? I'm sorry for getting confused but all the naysayers seem to be getting to me.
xHezz90 wrote...
I have a question....am I personally just too dumb to understand the ending or am I right and the ending makes no sense? I'm sorry for getting confused but all the naysayers seem to be getting to me.
Hexi329 wrote...
That aside, however, in regards to the points brought up about video games transforming into "serious media": It appears to be a common misconception that "art" or "higher forms of expression" need to be, to some extent, inaccessible, or at least that "art" should be under great control of the artists. This is patently untrue.
Shakespeare himself could easily be considered the "B-Movie" writer of his time, writing plays that would easily cater to the lowest common demoniator of the Elizabethan lower class. Although some of his more gory/raunchy/base works may have been forgotten/less "well-remebered" in modern times (i.e. Titus Adronicus), they were nonetheless among the most popular works of Shakespeare's time.
A more recent example of an artist adapting his art to an audience can be found in the work of Dickens. Dickens, as was common during the Victorian era, wrote many of his novels in a serial style. In many instances, when fans wrote mail to Dickens expressing their displeasure at his treatment of certain characters, he would more often than not listen to his fans and shoehorn in their suggestions despite whatever effect they would have on his plot. Insofar as this is the case, Dickens was motivated not only by the internal drive to create "art" or "literature" as much as he was to create a commercial product that would both cater and satisfy his fans.
That having been said, this theme of the commercialization of art runs rampant throughout various other forms of media. So-called high class "classical music" was written for a specific audience--the wealthy patrons that so often dominated the courts of 19th century Europe. Art during the Renaissance, like classical music, was made for wealthy patrons as well. And in more modern times, the rise of pop music and avant-garde pop art have catered to lower and lower denominators, undoubtedly showing a trend towards the democratization of art as a whole.
That having been said, if video games are really trying to establish themselves among the arts as a "serious medium", they should be willing to embrace what artists over the past millenia did without pause--cater to their intended audiences. Art is not made in a vacuum, nor should it ever be. Therefore, art should be made--and remade--to fit the desires or whims of the audience. And before anyone attempts to object that movie endings aren't changed, books aren't rewritten, etc... it would be important to note that movies can be remade, stories can be retold, and music be rewritten. And as long as those examples hold, why would it be unfair to ask that the ending of a videogame, if videogames can be considered art, be rewritten? After all, it is in the nature of a work of art to adapt to changing times, lest it be forgotten.
That having been said, to any who disagree to the point that videogames are art, the argument still holds: Video games are a commercial product. Commercial products should cater to the consumers to increase the profit margin. Consumers both wish for and are eager to pay for an alternate ending. Therefore, dlc should be released that changes the ending.
tl;dr Change the ending please
Modifié par pikey1969, 17 mars 2012 - 08:03 .
Sl4sh3r wrote...
xHezz90 wrote...
I have a question....am I personally just too dumb to understand the ending or am I right and the ending makes no sense? I'm sorry for getting confused but all the naysayers seem to be getting to me.
Unless the Indoctrination Theory holds true, then yes, you're right.
The endings make no sense.
You're not dumb
Hold the line!