deathscythe517 wrote...
Everyone I would like to politely suggest that we accumulate the various arguments we have made against the terrible endings and that we also coordinate our efforts into keeping morality strong. Find funny videos, provide an ear for your comrades to listen to, remember, united we stand and we cannot do this alone. We need to remain strong.
http://social.biowar.../index/10133310
Everyone should vote in the above thread as well as it provides even ground and many options but not enough to dillute our point, people, please.
That's a very good poll.
About the first point: An accumulation of arguments wouldn't be too helpful. Let's instead formulate one argument as to why the 'ending' makes no sense at all.
We're not asking for further 'explanation' as to the appearance of Casper, and the Normandy getting stranded. The problem is not that we're failing to understand any of these.
We're not asking BW to
justify their decisions. We don't think they can. We want the Casper scene
taken out, and the final role of the Catalyst and the Crucible be rethought.
We don't want the story of ME3 to come to an abrupt stop, at a Diabolus Ex Machina (Casper). We want events in the endgame to follow logically from previous events.
These are very general outlines, that make no 'positive' prescriptions; they rather lay out the necessary constraints under which BW out to rewrite the end.
We're not petitioning for specific endings. We're petitioning for an 'ending framework' that is logically sound.That's our demand for 'closure'. By 'closure', we do
not mean, "...extra farewell dialogues just before the Casper dialogue; and an epilogue as to what happens to the characters afterwards..."