Ce sujet est fermé
Do you really think thats what hes refering to? Loading a previous save. Thats common sense. Theres more to it than that.... I assume.DifferentD17 wrote...
Olueq wrote...
WAIT A MINUTE. APPARENTLY WE CAN PLAY AFTER THE END.
He said "going back".
Modifié par Olueq, 01 mars 2012 - 05:26 .
Guys, this is the canon ending right here.Random Jerkface wrote...
The turians and quarians, once unable to synthesise dextro-amino foods, will descend upon one another in a bloody campaign of cannibalistic hunger. The now-cured krogan will overrun the planet, provoking violence upon violence until they destroy what is left of Earth's resources in (another) nuclear holocaust.The Free Jaffa wrote...
Another problem. Apparently no technology works. Not even FTL. So...
Thousands of years later, the asari, who had been laying low by shaking their arses in clubs and screwing as many things as possible, reemerge as the keepers of the planet.
Earth becomes Thessia II.
Unit-Alpha wrote...
....I play ME for the story, not for the gameplay (which is still far worse than GoW, even the first one). I want a story that reflects our choices, not "sunshine and bunnies."
Olueq wrote...
Thats not what I was told.MJF JD wrote...
Olueq wrote...
WAIT A MINUTE. APPARENTLY WE CAN PLAY AFTER THE END.
ya...you revert back to before the last mission. Noone has said you dont get to play after the end of the game.
"I think the endings that we have in ME3 are
very distinct. We're obviously not going to branch them and tell
different stories. Shepard's journey, which is coming to an end, is
about the conflict with the Reapers, so it's not a situation where
you're fighting a new Krogan Rebellion all of a sudden in the Renegade
path, or something like that. That's not what ME is about. It is about
dealing with the Reapers, and it will be about how you deal with it, but
I think the interesting thing that we've done is reward players.
Players always ask, "What's the best ending? What's the best ending?"
And I always say, "I don't know. How are you playing your
game?" because what we're trying to do is provide endings that reward
you and match your gameplay, as opposed to you saying, "Hey, this is the
best ending." While there's always going to be this galaxy at war,
there is a game involved as well, and you can play it well or you can
play it poorly. And so we wonder about that aspect of it as well. There
may be a thing that's a best in terms of gameplay, but if you're talking
just about my choices and the flavor and the way I want to do it, then
it's really up to you and the way you want to play the game. As an
example in the Paragon and Renegade side, there are degrees of gameplay
within each of those, so you can play it optimally well for either side
and there may be other options, but I'm not talking about them."
Modifié par DifferentD17, 01 mars 2012 - 05:31 .
...yes and everyone I have talked to says we cant play after the end. Seriously, just reverting to a previous save? Thats common sense.MJF JD wrote...
Olueq wrote...
Thats not what I was told.MJF JD wrote...
Olueq wrote...
WAIT A MINUTE. APPARENTLY WE CAN PLAY AFTER THE END.
ya...you revert back to before the last mission. Noone has said you dont get to play after the end of the game.
well you didnt say you were told anything. You posted a Q&A from last year that says we get to play the game after we finish it.
Modifié par Olueq, 01 mars 2012 - 05:28 .
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 01 mars 2012 - 05:28 .
The problem is that there are other ways out of this situation. The game is demanding that we pretend that there aren't in order to force a variation of "All is lost, nothing you did made any difference" on us.Abram730 wrote...
Tietj wrote...
I just don't understand why people are so happy that other people are deprived of something that means a lot to them. It's a bit sadistic. And pretentious. But I'm glad you're happy.Abram730 wrote...
CptData wrote...
Pretty much what you said, OP.
In short:
BW told us, the endings won't make everybody happy.
Truth is: the endings will make everybody sad.
And that, fellow fans, is the only truth here. Lets shove that down their throat.
No rainbows and puppydog ending?
Count me in for 2 preorders now... I'm in. That's it... I'm in for $160 on this one.
I can't wait!!! I CAN'T WAIT!!!!
I'm not happy because you are upset.. I'm happy because it sounds like a good ending.
Stopping a galactic extinction is quite a good ending. I remember how angry people got with FO3.. The idea of trading the life of a virtual character to save humanity was unthinkable... I really didn't get that.. You would think a courageous ending would be good... But apparently the idea of self sacrifice is lost.. If there were an invading army, their would clearly be a boxspring above such people and not a gun in their hand.. Is nothing worth dying for to you? Trading the lives of one crew TO SAVE THE ENTIRE GALAXY is an insult to you?? Do explain, because I'm truly not getting it. Is courage that lost on you? I am really and truely asking this.. I'm not attempting to be sarcastic, or sadistic. I want to know.
People could of disagreed with the ideas way back when people voiced them. This sounds a lot like what many people described and asked for.. People agreed with the ideas then. I didn't hear strong objections then? Look back at some of the things I posted way back after ME2.. This sounds like what I was talking about and people liked the ideas then.
So it's not rainbows and kittens.. Good. You trade your life for the galaxy. Is the galaxy to small?
It's a hero's death.
A HERO'S DEATH!!!
So excuse myat the outrage.
Kasen13 wrote...
That's the real reason this is such a big deal to me. Many of us have spent 5-6 years getting attached to these characters, the places and lore. If it were a single game that we spent a week with, it wouldn't hit nearly as hard as this does (the earlier mentions of RDR come to mind here). Essentially, we've been told all these years that these characters, these places are what we're fighting for, this civilization... and now, it's all gone. The Mass Effect universe as we know it ceases to exist. If that is not the very definition of sad, I don't know what is.Crimsanity wrote...
Nathan Redgrave wrote...
Am I really the only one here who thinks the game attached to the ending is just a LITTLE more important than those last few minutes of non-interactive cutscene?
Nah. It's just that this is the way Shepard's entire saga ends, so there's ~six years riding on it. The destination's more important than it would be if this game was a standalone.
Edited to add: If that is indeed not the case, which I very much hope it is not, then I'll be jumping for joy that this was all a big mistake.
Patriota125 wrote...
Unit-Alpha wrote...
....I play ME for the story, not for the gameplay (which is still far worse than GoW, even the first one). I want a story that reflects our choices, not "sunshine and bunnies."
I see a lack of intelligence there. ME2-3's gameplay far worse than Gears? Really? GTFO please man, seriously GTFO.
DeinonSlayer wrote...
The sad fact is that any Turians or Quarians trapped in our system without FTL capability (which goes down with the Destroy ending, along with the relays) will eventually starve to death. We don't have a dextro-based ecology. We can't feed them.The Free Jaffa wrote...
I really, really doubt that even if this is the end, that it's the end. People say that the Normandy got shot through a wormhole, right? Well, maybe that's the new interstellar travel in a future Mass Effect game? Because honestly, what the hell? If this is the case, in my game the geth, quarians, rachni, turians, krogans, asari, volus, elcor, hanar, drell, and humans will all be stuck in Sol. It's unrealistic to believe they can all thrive in the same system. Something will have to happen.
Maybe they'll initiate a Farscape project and they'll discover wormholes. Hell, if that ending is a descendant of the Normandy crew, they could just be lost. It's very possible that, because they were shot through a wormhole and crashed, they haven't been found yet.
Unit-Alpha wrote...
That would explain some behavior on the Normandy... Jack is awfully close to the drive core and the ants comment she makes... someone's been borrowing some eezo;)
Dey mad.Nyaore wrote...
Ah, the amount of vitriol on this thread between members is quite astounding. I'm going to need more popcorn.
mnomaha wrote...
...So, Liara has a impenetrable plot armour, Edi gets a body and Thane still dies? WTF? Seriously?
Shep may or may not die, the crew are magically teleported to some unknown part of space to die of starvation and we're pretty much boned no matter what we do?
God this is sick ****.
albertalad wrote...
Unit-Alpha
...I play ME for the story, not for the gameplay (which is still far worse than GoW, even the first one). I want a story that reflects our choices, not "sunshine and bunnies."
Modifié par MelfinaofOutlawStar, 01 mars 2012 - 05:31 .
albertalad wrote...
Yeah, some one played the game somewhere and some "claim" they saw the vids. BS! If you actually saw the vids YOU would have had them posted on Utube. No vids YOU are full of crap! And don't give me some one - yet no one posting here - somehow has all the answers - BS! Next, leaked script - yeah right - BW lost this scrip and followed it to the letter knowing full well it was on the internet. Yeah, right - have I got one for YOU. BS!
gee, thats only been said a million times. Ur funny.Nyaore wrote...
Ah, the amount of vitriol on this thread between members is quite astounding. I'm going to need more popcorn.
Seriously though, can we at least pretend to be civil?
Retour en haut
