Yuoaman wrote...
So any news in the last seven hours or so?
Beeb article
http://www.bbc.co.uk...nology-17444719
Yuoaman wrote...
So any news in the last seven hours or so?
Xyalon wrote...
SpuDSheraM wrote...
Yeah I noticed that too haha,
http://www.google.co...TF-8&q=ea stock
I was following it here. The graph has some good interactivity.
More interactivity than the ME3 ending in fact.
DJBare wrote...
Thought some of you would like to see the BBC news technology face page.
DJBare wrote...
Thought some of you would like to see the BBC news technology face page.
Modifié par nitefyre410, 20 mars 2012 - 02:28 .
Iucounou wrote...
Indeed. My save game for ME2 said I had played for 46 hours. At the end of ME3 I had played for 26 hours. I admit, I did not do all the little fetch and carry quests, but even being generous and adding another 10 hours, that would only make it to 36 hours. Makes you wonder.
Mandemon wrote...
Got to love how the stock price goes.
March 7, stock low. Mass Effect 3 releasead in US.
March 8, huge rise!
March 9, drop in the price.
March 12, rise in in the price
March 14, price drops like it's going out of the fashion.
March 15, Japan release, sharp increa.
March 16, peak, followed by quick fall as japanese fans start to finish the game XD
Welsh Inferno wrote...
CheekyWeazel wrote...
I must say i am a little worried about the Movement because of the Responses to the ME3 Suggested Changes Feedback Thread it has only around 150 Pages. Im worried that it isnt enough response.
What was accomplished so far is somehow amazing i must say, but still im worried about the official Bioware Respond to the End Thread.
We dont want to clutter up the Feedback thread with "hold the line" posts and such. Dont worry, they definately know what what problems we have with the ending.
Matt_gekko88 wrote...
Peete wrote...
Ossborn76 wrote...
Hold the line!
Isn't the point of the movement that once we get what we want we'll just forget it all and forgive?
Yeah but don't tell BioWare.
VonVerrikan wrote...
This damn thread is more important to me than I could ever imagine. My net was out today, so I've come all the way out to an internet cafe JUST to help support the line. It's amazing, really..
Please never give up, guys. This entire ME universe is counting on us@
ld1449 wrote...
My original theory on the Reapers was that, since one can immagine that the first race did not have the doom and gloom of iminent destruction over their heads they spread out through the galaxy, occupying it entirely until their population grew to such a degree that they could no longer sustain themselves as a race due to lack of resources. Similar to what was happening to the Drell, except that they had no saving grace to come down and rescue them, and that it was happening on a galactic scale.
The synthetics they had created eventually came to the conclusion that this would happen again and again and again after whatever infighting or civil war was done for.
So they took control, harvesting enormous ammounts of the first race to create the first reapers and wiping out the rest. Thus the foundation of the cycle.
They sought to preserve evolved, inteligent organic life, or those they deemed "worthy" in what was essentially an eternal museum (the reaper itself)
That was the theory anyway. Don't know about you people but I prefer it to the cyrcular logic of Organics will always be killed by synthetics so I- *Yada yada yada* you get the idea.
Modifié par donmaciu, 20 mars 2012 - 03:07 .
LethesDeep wrote...
How about we say this:
"The Retake ME3 movement is asking BioWare to add multiple, radically different endings to ME3 that take choices the player made throughout the series into account. Before the game's release BioWare promised us 16 radically different endings that took previous player choices into account. These endings would range from a minorly sad, yet happy ending to having the Reapers (the main antagonists) win. The final product does not contain any of this. Furthermore, it has no resolution and has lore inconsistencies. RetakeME3 is asking BioWare to fix these issues and live up to the promises many of us bought the game on. We are also aware that there are some people who enjoy the endings as is. We do not want to tread upon their enjoyment of the series, therefore we ask that if BioWare does fix the endings they release the fix as an optional DLC."
Feel free to add anything. I'm sure I didn't properly address all of our grievances.
Modifié par Gi-Joe-Ge, 20 mars 2012 - 02:32 .
Welsh Inferno wrote...
Nice to see BBC take a neutral stance.
nitefyre410 wrote...
Welsh Inferno wrote...
Nice to see BBC take a neutral stance.
Neutral or postive the point that this has made Tech Page of one of Worlds leading news outlets is a victory and just puts more pressure on EA and Bioware because they want to this story to go away...
we can't let the happen. Plus it always serves a huge counter punch to IGN, Destructiod, and Kotaku...
Who would put more stock in BBC or IGN?
nitefyre410 wrote...
Welsh Inferno wrote...
Nice to see BBC take a neutral stance.
Neutral or postive the point that this has made Tech Page of one of Worlds leading news outlets is a victory and just puts more pressure on EA and Bioware because they want to this story to go away...
we can't let the happen. Plus it always serves a huge counter punch to IGN, Destructiod, and Kotaku...
Who would put more stock in BBC or IGN?
DarthLaxian wrote...
hm...
i don't know, but if this movement works (and i hope it will), then, maybe we should "keep it alive", because i am pretty sure, a lot of us play other games (like say biowares Dragon Age, SW:TOR and also games like say Starcraft II, Crysis (1 and 2) etc.) and we - as seen now - do not like to be screwed over, so maybe we should found some gamer-organisation to (the following could be a mission statement for an organisation):
Watch over games and the video-game industry, in order to never be screwed again and help ensuring that we - the customers - are satisfied with the quality of future games (like a "game watch"-organisation...like say food-watch and organisation that makes sure that ensure that you are not screwed over in the supermarket (with smaller boxes, cheaper makeup of the food etc.)?...just and idea though...it could be fleshed out more, of course, like handing out a price for the company that is best in satisfying the customers or something like that...)
well just an idea, as stated, but IMHO it does have merrit - even more as the groundworks has been laid already with this campaign!
greetings LAX
Modifié par Ashtarth1, 20 mars 2012 - 02:47 .
firstarioch wrote...
Now with bbc behind me I can hit the times, evening standard. And daily telegraph.
Tonite more chats with Vin diesel publicist .need to pull that one.
Lets see....