Gonna have to join in again, artistic integrity isn't immutable.
When something has gone wrong and is so readily apparent to so many people, you'd be much better off holding your hands up and saying, "You're right, we'll sort this."
Whilst I understand this bunker mentality, it's hurting their core fanbase. As many have said, some people have no idea this movement even exists. They've seen the end of the game, one "huh" and moved on. Maybe they'll return to new games and franchises but aren't a guarantee.
Now I'm not saying they should change things just to please us but we are the ones they could most count on. When times are tough and money is tight, who's more likely to lay out £60 for a video game, casual players wh have finished the game once and moved on, or us? We who have multiple saves and keep an eye out for the latest developments from our favourite studios, be they Valve, Bioware or even Team 17?
Having read the blog post I do understand what they are trying to do but it does read as quite an insulting letter to your fans. What would have been so difficult to say some people wanted more, we're working on things to that end? Still not a gurantee of endiing DLC but doesn't feel like a pat on the head from a weary dog owner.
I'm also very pleased with Forbes during all this, articulating these thoughts for us in a much more concise mannner. Given the number of articles that have been in this magazine already after such a short time frame, I'd have thought Bioware would be showing that they are aware of what's going on. They aren't just in the gaming magazines now, even big buisiness mags are commenting on this. Not acknowledging this cannot be something they ca maintain. They may be able to ignore Gamesradar for example, but The BBC, Forbes, The Guardian... These are all much more powerful corporations than even the biggest gaming website. Surely some comment to these people are necessary at this point?
Holding the line,
Pipe 42