SilverOnemi wrote...
RatedRRachel wrote...
MikeFL25 wrote...
I'm sure this has been brought up, but...
Anyone in the Retake movement believe in the Indpoctrination Theory? After watching videos by Angry Joe and ACAVYOS that go very in-depth on its analysis, I have no choice but to agree...there are just too many things that make sense and fit perfectly. Plus it would leave the opportunity open for a real ending.
Anyone else seen these? What is your opinion on it?
I did believe in it, but feel that if that was the case, Bioware sold an incomplete game. The endings suck and have no real player affected choice. The indoctrination theory makes them make more sense. But if it was indoctrination, the ending shouldn't have ended with the stupid "Shepard is a legend" prompt and star-gazer scene. Cause we don't exactly know how Shepard beat the reapers and why he/she is considered "the Shepard". I want to believe in it, just because it would have shown more thought on Bioware's part. But I don't think it makes the ending that much better.
if you saw mac walters notes this is what he intended... for you to write the ending.
dig deep enough and you'll find some sort of logic in this mess.
Yeah, the whole "we're not sure how to end it so we'll leave it up to the player's imagination." I guess in a way, that is what this whole movement is about - our right to choose and not be told these are the three endings (especially when they make no sense in the lore of series). But Bioware has always prided themselves on their stories. A little openendedness is fine. What was left at the end of Mass Effect 3... it seems too much. Especially since what the player thought about the Mass Effect universe (the dark energy build up, the mass relays, etc...) are all no longer around.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





