Chronor wrote...
<snipped>
I think it would have been more prudent if the risk, in this particular situation, had been taken in a DLC, e.g., the game should have had an ending similar to what we had been clamoring for and the DLC should have the current ending with the star child et al. That way, BW could have expressed their "artistic" vision while minimizing any potential negative feedback because the fans would have been more receptive to what BW was trying to do.
Just a new take & opinion on my part.
IF the star-child's arguments have been more logical and thought out (which they were not). Then I could see the logic in making him/it a DLC that added to the story. Having the being who created the Reapers explaining WHY they did so before the last rush towards Earth could have given the ending an entirely different twist and the very sort of speculative ending Bioware said they were aiming for...if it was written with some careful thought.
In fact potentially they could still do this, by cutting the current ending out and making it part of an earlier mission with the 'endings' giving Shepard bonuses of some form (Say a bonus to damage and ammunition carried for destroy, health and shield bonuses for sythesis and a bonus to powers for dominate).
Not that I expect any of this to be considered *shrugs*