BigglesFlysAgain wrote...
Just make sure you have ash covering them from behind in case anything goes wrong....
Or Wrex.
That'd probably keep them in line.
BigglesFlysAgain wrote...
Just make sure you have ash covering them from behind in case anything goes wrong....
I find Mark Meer to be just perfect for my Shepard, but not necessarily the default face. He certainly fits a paragon Shep just right in my book though!LadyMarisa wrote...
You know, I always played a FemShep but after seeing that Forbes article with the voice actor for MaleShep, I might do a replay as a guy. Mark Meer is hot!I'm a voice person myself though (part of why I love Thane and Garrus so much). All flirting aside, I respect what he had to say so I may have to play through hearing his voice for a change. Congratulations, a VA did what BW has failed to do and got me to consider a third playthrough.
MeldarthX wrote...
Hmmm.....just fired up ME and it was Deumure Studios and Bioware......hmmm
Anastassia wrote...
Ask for a new ending, be disappointed, but don't demand things. Don't act as if your opinion is the only one that matters. And don't attach a completely unrelated charity to your cause to lend it credibility, and then ask for donations back because that charity was completely unrelated to your cause.
Stygian1 wrote...
BigglesFlysAgain wrote...
Just make sure you have ash covering them from behind in case anything goes wrong....
Or Wrex.
That'd probably keep them in line.
They had a livestream up a couple hours ago discussing the ending. In it they basically agreed that the ending makes no sense unless it was indoctrination, and to my surprise they actually acknowledged the fact that with some kind of suplementary DLC the indoc theory isn't actually an ending.Alamandorious wrote...
Where's the IGN piece? ^^
Modifié par Alikan, 23 mars 2012 - 10:22 .
Dauw wrote...
Also, Buzz Aldrin didn't do a very good job, did he? I felt like I was listening to a guy reading from a cue card during that whole epilogue.
Modifié par chrrue_, 23 mars 2012 - 10:22 .
toffeetrooper wrote...
Stygian1 wrote...
I... I hate and can't believe I'm saying this...
But, is the IGN war asset acquired?
not that it matter, as we all know assets mean squat its what bioware wants that matters
My advice, let it go.LadyMarisa wrote...
What in the world did I miss?
Most of us here have completely ackowledged the validity of opinions that differ from ours.
We didn't attach a charity to lend our cause crediblity, we support a charity because we have a solid group and regardless of whether or not we get what we'd like to see, we knew we could do some good for the gaming world by donating to a gaming related charity.
I must have missed people asking for donations back because the only thing I've seen so far are people asking what the totals were up to and cheering the group on for having raised said money.
I'm more than a little confused by your statements.
chujwamdotego wrote...
heartwarming piece
explains best the need for new endings
Modifié par Little Miss Angel, 23 mars 2012 - 10:24 .
BigglesFlysAgain wrote...
Stygian1 wrote...
I... I hate and can't believe I'm saying this...
But, is the IGN war asset acquired?
Just make sure you have ash covering them from behind in case anything goes wrong....
I notice that that he didn't actually mention his view on the ending, but I like the fact that he mentions DLC (i.e Broken Steel) have already set a precendent for changing the end.MeldarthX wrote...
http://www.forbes.co...ending-and-dlc/
Hmmm.......
Anastassia wrote...
MeldarthX wrote...
Hmmm.....just fired up ME and it was Deumure Studios and Bioware......hmmm
Demiurge Studios, a studio a very close friend of mine works at, was responsible for porting Mass Effect to the PC. The PC version came out quite a while after the initial release of Mass Effect on the Xbox 360.
right so lets say they do the indoc theory to explain the current ending.Hydralysk wrote...
They had a livestream up a couple hours ago discussing the ending. In it they basically agreed that the ending makes no sense unless it was indoctrination, and to my surprise they actually acknowledged the fact that with some kind of suplementary DLC the indoc theory isn't actually an ending.Alamandorious wrote...
Where's the IGN piece? ^^
Hydralysk wrote...
I notice that that he didn't actually mention his view on the ending, but I like the fact that he mentions DLC (i.e Broken Steel) have already set a precendent for changing the end.MeldarthX wrote...
http://www.forbes.co...ending-and-dlc/
Hmmm.......
kewnsty wrote...
right so lets say they do the indoc theory to explain the current ending.
its by no means the new ending.
soo either they will include fan ideas about the choices u made in previus scenes/ games. come and help you at the end
garrus comming over and fighting over your body. grunt comming in and smashing a few reapers. callin over more krogan. asari biotics forming a protective barrier around the group . and u see the fleets punching a hole in the reapers.?
or ? how would u do the new ending?
+ think harbinger should be saved for mass effect 4?
hes trying to rebuild a reaper fleet or something.
Yeah, like CoD4.2 became MW2...Not sure about this...TamiBx wrote...
kewnsty wrote...
right so lets say they do the indoc theory to explain the current ending.
its by no means the new ending.
soo either they will include fan ideas about the choices u made in previus scenes/ games. come and help you at the end
garrus comming over and fighting over your body. grunt comming in and smashing a few reapers. callin over more krogan. asari biotics forming a protective barrier around the group . and u see the fleets punching a hole in the reapers.?
or ? how would u do the new ending?
+ think harbinger should be saved for mass effect 4?
hes trying to rebuild a reaper fleet or something.
Maybe Bioware should just drop their "it's a trilogy" idea and make ME4 <_<
Oh wait, better yet. They should make Mass Effect 3.5 or something.