no changing game endings is not dangerous, it makes a point to the developers than there making the games for the FANS and not themself.
it also allows developers to have a franchise continue and in some cases start a new franchise.
bioware did say "this is not the end of the mass effect universe" , well the endings say otherwise, the ending says we just destroyed the universe
no universe = no more mass effect no more franchise
the ending needs to have more than just an A,B,C every other ME game had nearly 6 per game BUT bioware stated that ME3 has SIXTEEN endings and we have only ONE (in 3 diffrent colours) they cant call that 3 endings or in some cases they call it 6 (yes i saw the video where it showed you the good,bad and medium ending of each flavour) so yeeeeeeeeah changing the ending is a good idea and also gives developers a chance to see that there fans care.
games that are shoved down our throat each year (need for speed, fifa, madden, PGA golf, COD, battlefied just to name a few are like john cena, it starts off freaking awesome but then it gets on our nerves then it just gets to the stage of it being more chit diffrent day.
games that are released every 2-3 or even 4 years we all know its going to be great and we can all expect the game to be a massive hit and amazing gameplay and an even more amazing ending.
games like the gta series, there released every 2-4 years because there in development for at least 2 years before its announced. apart from gta 3 and vice city
gta 3 = 2001
gta vice city = 2002
gta san andreas = 2004
gta 4 = 2008
gta 5 announced 2012 release date 2013
this is just an example, games in a 2 year development always make sweet games and need no hype because its expected.
the 1 year development for me3 was really good as it was going to be great, promises made a week before release hyped it up huge but then ALL those promises were broken.
rockstar promise a bigger and better game each time they make GTA and they keep it, they also promise a full interactive story which they keep.
red dead redemption was a f**king awesome game, so awesome fans are screaming for a second RDR with marston in lead role again (undead nightmare is a non-cannon DLC) and rockstar have dropped hints on a sequel, L.A Noire is a confirmed sequel.
rockstar DOES listen to feedback and DOES listen to the fans and what the fans say needed improved and what should be in the game is put into the next game.
now if bioware took the same outlook as rockstar then the mass effect series would have been THE KILLER sci-fi RPG of ALL TIME but since they dont and they just care about "ARTIST INTEGRITY" then there idiots.
BUT BIOWARE has a chance to redeem itself to the WORLD as its still in the news EVERYWHERE and the RETAKE MASS EFFECT protest is gaining more speed and more people each day.
by saying that were "entitled brats" among other insults is giving bioware a VERY BAD reputation and it making it look like a company that does not care about fans and care more about money.
even having there own staff admit that they ignore feedback from the fans.
a couple of links i have makes me think were all being suckered
http://www.qj.net/pc...effect-dlc.htmlhttp://www.qj.net/pc...r-feedback.htmlhttp://www.qj.net/xb...-cutscenes.htmlso yeah some of those links made me think..........were being f**ked around by bioware
Modifié par chmarr, 27 mars 2012 - 03:18 .