Phoenix NL wrote...
Well at least you found your soul. It's always a pain when you misplace those things, sneaky little buggers!
Unlike your teachers, I expect a full submission of your work by the 5th, but I will give you leeway until the 6th because of the soul-finding - as long as it's done in time for PAX.
So you're really looking forward to me explaining how Hemingway's minimalistic technique creates three dimensions of relationship description, one being the objective narrator's description of the setting of the story, second one an image constructed by the reader interpreting dialogue and thus projecting their beliefs on the characters, thus making this dimension the character's understanding of their relationship, and finally the third one being the sole dimension of the reader, created by first dimension paralleling the second one, yet conflicting it couple of times, creating a dimension of discrepancy and thus excluding the reader from the story?
...if you insist.
// And yes, I can say this with a straight face, and still I hated the ending of ME3 and think it's bad from a narrative perspective. It's nice to know I can act as a valid argument against 'you just didn't get it' whining.
Modifié par Atrocity, 02 avril 2012 - 10:35 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




