Snoozems7 wrote...
I finished ME3 a few hours ago for the first time, and initially I was pretty confused and then shortly after, angry. But after reading more on these forums and other things, Indoctrination Theory really makes sense.
Personally, I think even calling it a theory at this point is ridiculous. Unfortunately, I had heard about the outraged fans at the ending before I got to play it. I never read any spoilers and just played it once; and because the ending is a bit more difficult to digest if Indoc is true, you're unlikely to really completely realise what is going on after one single playthrough where you are still mezmerised by other new aspects of the gameplay.
Arguably, that probably shouldn't happen, but it has.
I'm sure there are plenty of people on here that have played through it more than once already and disagree with Indoc, but I really don't see how you can.
I think the problem here has been that fans generally weren't expecting something this subtle and it took a lot of people aback. We didn't give the writers enough credit, and I spent an hour posting crap on here before I thought about it properly, which I'd like to retract.
No one could have predicted that any game company would be willing to risk pissing off so many core fans because of beautiful writing that might take a bit longer to shine through.
I suggest that (if you haven't already) read about Indoc or watch some videos about it on youtube, then replay ME3, which I'm about to do now, then see what you think.
Of course, I can't be certain Indoc is correct, but just try it if you haven't already.
I wanted to believe IT, but as more time goes by and the details are bubbling up from the Latin American arm of EA, and Jennifer Hale saying that Bioware hasn't contacted her yet. I just really think that they legitimately blew it, and you know what? That's ok. Nobody's perfect. I just want to see what they plan on doing to "clarify" what they did decide to give us.