Cybermortis wrote...
The senario is not quite as daft as it seems, and even leaving out the whole 'Force-directed' thing is not as far-fetched as you might think.
The Empire was large, but it also had to protect a vast area. As military forces have discovered throughout history numbers count for little if you have to spread them out over a large area, and your opponents are smart enough not to try and match strength with strength.
The Empires power was also a weakness because it was invested in a single individual, and then down to local warlords who were compeating for attention and power from the 'King'. Again, history shows that if you have a large empire with power invested in the above manner. Then the leader is killed, those warlords have a habit of fighting each other over who gets to rule next.
Last of all in the case of the Battle for Endor the Imperial fleet lost both of its commanders within minutes - first Admiral Piett, then the Palpatine. Coupled with the distinct 'by the book no exceptions' mentality of the Imperial Navy, this mean that without clear leadership and in a 'brawl' (in this case a very chaotic, close quarters fight) the Imperial Captains were unsure how to react.
*snip*
Oh, I have no problem with Empire loosing after Palpatine dies and Executor goes down with the best troops on board, since it's clear Emperor always was the weakest point of the Empire. I just feel that with guys like Tarkin occupying most of the higher seats, they should've been able to destroy most of the rebels before things went as far as Endor. Then again, Palpatine's ego probably got in the way of efficient military strategy every step of the way.
And no, there is no way anyone can convince me even the goddamn Emperor could control even half of his commanding officers via Force. To me Force is a natural phenomenon, not Space Magic Solution.

I do feel that Zahn did the best he could with what he had though, not his fault what he had was... well.. what it was.
Modifié par Atrocity, 04 avril 2012 - 10:33 .