Tossska wrote...
=(
Just going back through ME1... Entered, heard the music "Vigil" from the main menu...
Remembered everything. Cried for about 5 minutes. Turned off.
='(
~gives you a big hug and a pat on the back~
Tossska wrote...
=(
Just going back through ME1... Entered, heard the music "Vigil" from the main menu...
Remembered everything. Cried for about 5 minutes. Turned off.
='(
yjchew wrote...
AllegedVixEo wrote...
...snip...
Argument 2: Large entities who make sizable profit and/or make commercial goods for profit cannot consider their proprietary creative output as art and therefore cannot claim artistic integrity.
...
Apple is an example of a HUGE company, that prides itself on its ability to maintain artistic integrity. I have never seen a company that is more invested in the creativity of their developers, and in protecting the identity of the product and the integrity of what they put out. You don't get any bigger than Apple, so again the argument that a "big company" shouldn't be able to claim artistic integrity is rubbish.
1. I have been following this argument since the beginning, and I have not seen anyone anywhere make the distinction between LARGE and SMALL entities. The key is that this so-called "art" is being sold for PROFIT, i.e. commercial interests. As an example, if I commission a painting of myself, I have every right to reject the artist's rendition if it doesn't match my requirements. Can you imagine, the artist telling me he won't alter the painting because of "INTEGRITY"? Once something is being produced for sale to the mass market, the public CERTAINLY can and should respond. Whether the company does anything about that is another thing, but it would be the smart thing to do especially given the breadth and depth of the organisation around Retake ME movement.
2. Apple has ALWAYS cared about what its customers think and the fact that they have responded to the recent allegations of mistreatment in their factories shows that they care about perception (Whether or not they REALLY care is immaterial). Similarly, they DID respond to the antenna issues in the iPhone 4. While they first downplayed it (typical PR tactic), you can be sure they were hard at work fixing it in parallel. They could have just continued downplaying it and saying "you are holding it wrong". But they know that the core of their brand are their FANATICAL CUSTOMERS and they need to keep these people happy.
3. In any corporation, there are MANY stakeholders. Customers are but one. PArent company EA and BW senior management sure had a say in the ME3 story. Doubtless the focus on MP or Kinect was due to upper management pressure. So the story and the essence of the game are being altered even before it hits the shelves. Why doesn't the project team claim artistic integrity and tell the management folks the "leave us alone?" Yet they use this argument for their most loyal fans? Mystifying
Modifié par AllegedVixEo, 06 avril 2012 - 04:07 .
Tossska wrote...
=(
Just going back through ME1... Entered, heard the music "Vigil" from the main menu...
*snips pic*
Remembered everything. Cried for about 5 minutes. Turned off.
='(
Maike91 wrote...
Hey guys, I have a question: Do we know why Vigil has no clue about the Crucible? Or why he/it didn't tell us about it?
Modifié par nitefyre410, 06 avril 2012 - 04:10 .
Maike91 wrote...
BigglesFlysAgain wrote...
Maike91 wrote...
Hey guys, I have a question: Do we know why Vigil has no clue about the Crucible? Or why he/it didn't tell us about it?
Well the simplist explanation is that the Ilos team was very isolated from the rest of the prothean empire, and vigil's purpose was looking after the facility there, not knowledge on every thing the protheans were doing, but it is an oversight, he could have know but time was short anyway.
Thanks for the answer. But it's still strange...Javik knows about it, he was born after the Reapers already took the Citadel so he should be kinda isolated, too. Maybe Vigil really doesn't know. Doesn't matter anyway
It's strange though, the Reapers had no idea that so many species tried to build a weapon for...a loooong time? But I see your point.nitefyre410 wrote...
Maike91 wrote...
Hey guys, I have a question: Do we know why Vigil has no clue about the Crucible? Or why he/it didn't tell us about it?
They have to protect both projects made it so neither knew about other, incase the Reapers happened to find either one. They would not get information on the other.
Yeah that makes sense. Still, for me the Crucible plot feels just slapped on to the ME universeGroverA125 wrote...
Maike91 wrote...
BigglesFlysAgain wrote...
Maike91 wrote...
Hey guys, I have a question: Do we know why Vigil has no clue about the Crucible? Or why he/it didn't tell us about it?
Well the simplist explanation is that the Ilos team was very isolated from the rest of the prothean empire, and vigil's purpose was looking after the facility there, not knowledge on every thing the protheans were doing, but it is an oversight, he could have know but time was short anyway.
Thanks for the answer. But it's still strange...Javik knows about it, he was born after the Reapers already took the Citadel so he should be kinda isolated, too. Maybe Vigil really doesn't know. Doesn't matter anyway
It didn't work, remember? The Crucible wouldn't work, and thus wouldn't really be the topic at hand, would it? What would you spend your last few breaths (if you'll pardon the term) on? Telling them that you had a superweapon but it didn't work, or that if they don't get to the citadel immediately and stop sovereign, they will all be killed? I do believe Vigil was a little pre-occupied at the time explaining what was going to happen if sovereign got the citadel active.
But that was their artistic vision. Good or bad it's their vision and it would be wrong to challenge that.Lestatman wrote...
See if I hear the term Artistic Integrity one more time I gonna scream. Tali's face (stock photo) = Artisitic Integrity. Adding the star child in the last moments of story is not artistic it is simply bad writing. Shepards acceptance of what the star child says is not artistic it's again bad writing. Pick a colour from 3 is not artistic it's oh you know where I'm going with this.
toffeetrooper wrote...
*snip*
welcome back coffee or beer
A bit over the top just for being picked on. Except for the one who pulled a gun on Tali, Incinerate was definitely the right way to go there!The_Canadian_Dragon wrote...
This might be good for a laugh. Be prepared for cartoon violence though.
www.youtube.com/watch
Jesta79-X wrote...
There is an incoming MP DLC free
Seems like they want the pressure off them by offering free stuff
Modifié par Maike91, 06 avril 2012 - 04:29 .
I was being sarcastic (hence the escaping logic statement). I think we'll actually have to agree to agree because we do agree.Lestatman wrote...
@ Reorte I'm afraid we'll have to agree to disagree.
I personally and repeat personally think it's just an opt out clause for them. Stephen King's the Dark Tower series was a series of books I loved and in the last and seventh book at the end SK warned the readers that they might not like what they're about to read and maybe they should stop reading now. But I carried on and yes I hated the final ending but I didn't write to SK and ask him to change it because it's a book and I have as a reader no input in the characters or story as I'm only a passenger whereas ME was different.